Cargando…

The Gluteus Medius Experiences Significant Excursion With Hip Flexion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of hip flexion and rotation on excursion of the gluteus medius (Gmed) and minimus (Gmin) myotendinous unit. METHODS: Seven hips from 4 cadaveric specimens (males, 68.5 ± 18.3 years old) were dissected to isolate the Gmed posterior and lateral insertions and the Gmin p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Timothy, Wright, David, Long, Charles, Truong, Victor, Adamson, Gregory, McGarry, Michelle H., Lee, Thay Q.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.05.002
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of hip flexion and rotation on excursion of the gluteus medius (Gmed) and minimus (Gmin) myotendinous unit. METHODS: Seven hips from 4 cadaveric specimens (males, 68.5 ± 18.3 years old) were dissected to isolate the Gmed posterior and lateral insertions and the Gmin proximal and distal insertions. Sutures were placed from tendon insertions through origins created in the iliac fossa to simulate the myotendinous unit. A load of 10N was applied. Myotendinous excursion was measured at 10° hip extension and 0°, 45°, and 90° of hip flexion in neutral rotation, and from maximum internal and external rotation in 90° flexion. The amount of abduction and rotation was also measured at each flexion position with 20N applied to each tendon. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc was used for statistics. RESULTS: Gmed-lateral excursion ranged from 2.4 ± 0.4 mm in 10° of hip extension to 23.0 ± 1.5 mm in 90° of flexion (P < .001), and Gmed-posterior excursion ranged from 0.92 ± 0.5 mm in 10° of extension to 38.1 ± 1.1 mm in 90° of flexion (P < .001). Gmin excursion shortened with hip flexion from 4.2 ± 0.3 mm in 10° of extension to −0.2 ± 1.5 mm in 90° of flexion (Gmin-prox: P = .525, Gmin-distal: P < .001). At 90° flexion from maximum internal to maximum external rotation, Gmin-distal and proximal demonstrated a 92.6% and 51.3% increase in excursion, respectively (P < .001). Gmed-lateral and Gmed-posterior demonstrated 49.4% and 23.1% increase in excursion with external rotation, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The Gmed myotendinous unit undergoes significant excursion with hip flexion, whereas both Gmed and Gmin had significant excursion with femoral external rotation in 90° flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is important to understand whether active or passive hip flexion or rotation in the early postoperative period causes excessive strain to an abductor tendon repair. We found that consideration should be given to limit flexion after Gmed repair and external rotation after Gmed or Gmin repairs.