Cargando…

Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?

BACKGROUND: Labor progression curves are believed to differ between spontaneous and induced labors. However, data describing labor progression patterns with different modes of induction are insufficient. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the progress patterns between labors induced with slow-re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shalev-Ram, Hila, Cirkin, Roi, Cohen, Gal, Ram, Shai, Louzoun, Yoram, Kovo, Michal, Biron-Shental, Tal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100198
_version_ 1785097815532240896
author Shalev-Ram, Hila
Cirkin, Roi
Cohen, Gal
Ram, Shai
Louzoun, Yoram
Kovo, Michal
Biron-Shental, Tal
author_facet Shalev-Ram, Hila
Cirkin, Roi
Cohen, Gal
Ram, Shai
Louzoun, Yoram
Kovo, Michal
Biron-Shental, Tal
author_sort Shalev-Ram, Hila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Labor progression curves are believed to differ between spontaneous and induced labors. However, data describing labor progression patterns with different modes of induction are insufficient. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the progress patterns between labors induced with slow-release prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue and those induced with a double-balloon catheter. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included all nulliparous women who delivered at term and who underwent cervical ripening with prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue or a double-balloon catheter from 2013 to 2021 in a tertiary hospital in Israel. Included in the analysis were women who achieved 10 cm cervical dilatation. The time intervals between centimeter-to-centimeter changes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1087 women were included of whom 786 (72.3%) were induced using prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue and 301 (27.7%) were induced using a double-balloon catheter. The time from induction to birth was similar between the groups (32.5 hours for the prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue group [5th–95th percentiles, 6.5–153.8] vs 29.2 hours for the double-balloon group [5th–95th percentiles, 9.1–157.1]; P=.100). The median time of the latent phase (2–6 cm dilation) was longer for the double-balloon catheter group than for the prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue group (7.3 hours [5th–95th percentiles, 5.6–14.5] vs 6.0 hours [5th–95th percentiles, 2.4–18.8]; P=.042). The median time of active labor (6–10 cm dilatation) was similar between groups (1.9 hours [5th–95th percentiles, 0.3–7.4] for the prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue group vs 2.3 hours [5th–95th percentiles, 0.3–6.5] for the double-balloon catheter group; P=.307). CONCLUSION: Deliveries subjected to cervical ripening with a double-balloon catheter were characterized by a slightly longer latent phase than deliveries induced by prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue. After reaching the active phase of labor, the mode of cervical ripening did not influence the labor progress pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10461249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104612492023-08-29 Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters? Shalev-Ram, Hila Cirkin, Roi Cohen, Gal Ram, Shai Louzoun, Yoram Kovo, Michal Biron-Shental, Tal AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Labor progression curves are believed to differ between spontaneous and induced labors. However, data describing labor progression patterns with different modes of induction are insufficient. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the progress patterns between labors induced with slow-release prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue and those induced with a double-balloon catheter. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included all nulliparous women who delivered at term and who underwent cervical ripening with prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue or a double-balloon catheter from 2013 to 2021 in a tertiary hospital in Israel. Included in the analysis were women who achieved 10 cm cervical dilatation. The time intervals between centimeter-to-centimeter changes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1087 women were included of whom 786 (72.3%) were induced using prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue and 301 (27.7%) were induced using a double-balloon catheter. The time from induction to birth was similar between the groups (32.5 hours for the prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue group [5th–95th percentiles, 6.5–153.8] vs 29.2 hours for the double-balloon group [5th–95th percentiles, 9.1–157.1]; P=.100). The median time of the latent phase (2–6 cm dilation) was longer for the double-balloon catheter group than for the prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue group (7.3 hours [5th–95th percentiles, 5.6–14.5] vs 6.0 hours [5th–95th percentiles, 2.4–18.8]; P=.042). The median time of active labor (6–10 cm dilatation) was similar between groups (1.9 hours [5th–95th percentiles, 0.3–7.4] for the prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue group vs 2.3 hours [5th–95th percentiles, 0.3–6.5] for the double-balloon catheter group; P=.307). CONCLUSION: Deliveries subjected to cervical ripening with a double-balloon catheter were characterized by a slightly longer latent phase than deliveries induced by prostaglandin E(2) vaginal analogue. After reaching the active phase of labor, the mode of cervical ripening did not influence the labor progress pattern. Elsevier 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10461249/ /pubmed/37645656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100198 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Shalev-Ram, Hila
Cirkin, Roi
Cohen, Gal
Ram, Shai
Louzoun, Yoram
Kovo, Michal
Biron-Shental, Tal
Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?
title Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?
title_full Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?
title_fullStr Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?
title_short Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?
title_sort is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100198
work_keys_str_mv AT shalevramhila isthereadifferenceinlaborpatternsafterinductionwithprostaglandinsanddoubleballooncatheters
AT cirkinroi isthereadifferenceinlaborpatternsafterinductionwithprostaglandinsanddoubleballooncatheters
AT cohengal isthereadifferenceinlaborpatternsafterinductionwithprostaglandinsanddoubleballooncatheters
AT ramshai isthereadifferenceinlaborpatternsafterinductionwithprostaglandinsanddoubleballooncatheters
AT louzounyoram isthereadifferenceinlaborpatternsafterinductionwithprostaglandinsanddoubleballooncatheters
AT kovomichal isthereadifferenceinlaborpatternsafterinductionwithprostaglandinsanddoubleballooncatheters
AT bironshentaltal isthereadifferenceinlaborpatternsafterinductionwithprostaglandinsanddoubleballooncatheters