Cargando…

Li + HF and Li + HCl Reactions Revisited I: QCT Calculations and Simulation of Experimental Results

[Image: see text] The Li + HF and Li + HCl reactions share some common features. They have the same kinematics, relatively small barrier heights, bent transition states, and are both exothermic when the zero point energy is considered. Nevertheless, the pioneering crossed beam experiments by Lee and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menéndez, Marta, Garcia, Ernesto, Lara, Manuel, Jambrina, Pablo G., Aoiz, F. Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37579497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c03763
_version_ 1785097821820551168
author Menéndez, Marta
Garcia, Ernesto
Lara, Manuel
Jambrina, Pablo G.
Aoiz, F. Javier
author_facet Menéndez, Marta
Garcia, Ernesto
Lara, Manuel
Jambrina, Pablo G.
Aoiz, F. Javier
author_sort Menéndez, Marta
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The Li + HF and Li + HCl reactions share some common features. They have the same kinematics, relatively small barrier heights, bent transition states, and are both exothermic when the zero point energy is considered. Nevertheless, the pioneering crossed beam experiments by Lee and co-workers in the 80s (Becker et al., J. Chem. Phys.1980,73, 2833) revealed that the dynamics of the two reactions differ significantly, especially at low collision energies. In this work, we present theoretical simulations of their results in the laboratory frame (LAB), based on quasiclassical trajectories and obtained using accurate potential energy surfaces. The calculated LAB angular distributions and time-of-flight spectra agree well with the raw experimental data, although our simulations do not reproduce the experimentally derived center-of-mass (CM) differential cross section and velocity distributions. The latter were derived by forward convolution fitting under the questionable assumption that the CM recoil velocity and scattering angle distribution were uncoupled, while our results show that the coupling between them is relevant. Some important insights into the reaction mechanism discussed in the article by Becker et al. had not been contrasted with those that can be extracted from the theoretical results. Among them, the correlation between the angular momenta involved in the reactions has also been examined. Given the kinematics of both systems, the reagent orbital angular momentum, [Image: see text], is almost completely transformed into the rotation of the product diatom, j′. However, contrary to the coplanar mechanism proposed in the original paper, we find that the initial and final relative orbital angular momenta are not necessarily parallel. Both reactions are found to be essentially direct, although about 15% of the LiFH complexes live longer than 200 fs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10461305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104613052023-08-29 Li + HF and Li + HCl Reactions Revisited I: QCT Calculations and Simulation of Experimental Results Menéndez, Marta Garcia, Ernesto Lara, Manuel Jambrina, Pablo G. Aoiz, F. Javier J Phys Chem A [Image: see text] The Li + HF and Li + HCl reactions share some common features. They have the same kinematics, relatively small barrier heights, bent transition states, and are both exothermic when the zero point energy is considered. Nevertheless, the pioneering crossed beam experiments by Lee and co-workers in the 80s (Becker et al., J. Chem. Phys.1980,73, 2833) revealed that the dynamics of the two reactions differ significantly, especially at low collision energies. In this work, we present theoretical simulations of their results in the laboratory frame (LAB), based on quasiclassical trajectories and obtained using accurate potential energy surfaces. The calculated LAB angular distributions and time-of-flight spectra agree well with the raw experimental data, although our simulations do not reproduce the experimentally derived center-of-mass (CM) differential cross section and velocity distributions. The latter were derived by forward convolution fitting under the questionable assumption that the CM recoil velocity and scattering angle distribution were uncoupled, while our results show that the coupling between them is relevant. Some important insights into the reaction mechanism discussed in the article by Becker et al. had not been contrasted with those that can be extracted from the theoretical results. Among them, the correlation between the angular momenta involved in the reactions has also been examined. Given the kinematics of both systems, the reagent orbital angular momentum, [Image: see text], is almost completely transformed into the rotation of the product diatom, j′. However, contrary to the coplanar mechanism proposed in the original paper, we find that the initial and final relative orbital angular momenta are not necessarily parallel. Both reactions are found to be essentially direct, although about 15% of the LiFH complexes live longer than 200 fs. American Chemical Society 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10461305/ /pubmed/37579497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c03763 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Menéndez, Marta
Garcia, Ernesto
Lara, Manuel
Jambrina, Pablo G.
Aoiz, F. Javier
Li + HF and Li + HCl Reactions Revisited I: QCT Calculations and Simulation of Experimental Results
title Li + HF and Li + HCl Reactions Revisited I: QCT Calculations and Simulation of Experimental Results
title_full Li + HF and Li + HCl Reactions Revisited I: QCT Calculations and Simulation of Experimental Results
title_fullStr Li + HF and Li + HCl Reactions Revisited I: QCT Calculations and Simulation of Experimental Results
title_full_unstemmed Li + HF and Li + HCl Reactions Revisited I: QCT Calculations and Simulation of Experimental Results
title_short Li + HF and Li + HCl Reactions Revisited I: QCT Calculations and Simulation of Experimental Results
title_sort li + hf and li + hcl reactions revisited i: qct calculations and simulation of experimental results
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37579497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c03763
work_keys_str_mv AT menendezmarta lihfandlihclreactionsrevisitediqctcalculationsandsimulationofexperimentalresults
AT garciaernesto lihfandlihclreactionsrevisitediqctcalculationsandsimulationofexperimentalresults
AT laramanuel lihfandlihclreactionsrevisitediqctcalculationsandsimulationofexperimentalresults
AT jambrinapablog lihfandlihclreactionsrevisitediqctcalculationsandsimulationofexperimentalresults
AT aoizfjavier lihfandlihclreactionsrevisitediqctcalculationsandsimulationofexperimentalresults