Cargando…

Unmasking the Hidden Fetus: Introducing the Circled Delta Sign and Reversed Circled Delta Sign for Accurate Identification on Abdominal Radiography

Patient: Female, 41-year-old Final Diagnosis: Incidental pregnancy Symptoms: Postprandial abdominal pain and fullness for months Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Gastroenterology and Hepatology • Obstetrics and Gynecology • Radiology OBJECTIVE: Mistake in diagnosis BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Hsing-Hao, Tsai, Hsiu-Ting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37621077
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.940689
_version_ 1785097825455964160
author Ho, Hsing-Hao
Tsai, Hsiu-Ting
author_facet Ho, Hsing-Hao
Tsai, Hsiu-Ting
author_sort Ho, Hsing-Hao
collection PubMed
description Patient: Female, 41-year-old Final Diagnosis: Incidental pregnancy Symptoms: Postprandial abdominal pain and fullness for months Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Gastroenterology and Hepatology • Obstetrics and Gynecology • Radiology OBJECTIVE: Mistake in diagnosis BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation poses potential health risk to fetuses, including growth retardation, organ malformations, neurological effects, fetal death, and cancer. Therefore, pregnant women rarely undergo X-ray imaging, unless absolutely necessary. However, they can be inadvertently exposed to X-rays while undergoing an examination without being aware of their pregnancy. Given that the likelihood of a fetus appearing on an abdominal radiograph is low, physicians can be unfamiliar with the appearance of a fetus on such images. If a fetus incidentally appears on an abdominal radiograph, the clinician can encounter difficulties in identifying the fetus, potentially leading to unexpected harm during subsequent imaging procedures. CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old woman presented with symptoms of postprandial abdominal pain, abdominal fullness, and urinary frequency. Abdominal radiography revealed a large mass with calcifications in the pelvis and lower abdomen, raising suspicion of a large pelvic tumor, such as a teratoma. However, subsequent ultrasound unexpectedly revealed that the woman was actually 6 months pregnant. The presumed tumor was an enlarged uterus, and the presumed calcifications were the fetus’s bones. Before X-ray, the woman had denied being pregnant, mistakenly attributing her condition to excess weight and irregular menstrual cycles. Fortunately, the use of ultrasound instead of computed tomography prevented radiation exposure to the fetus, and the baby was delivered in a healthy state at full term. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid unintended harm to fetuses, clinicians should consider the possibility of pregnancy when evaluating a pelvic mass in women of childbearing age. To aid clinicians in accurately identifying fetuses on abdominal radiography and thereby reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosis, we propose the “circled delta sign” and the “reversed circled delta sign”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10461323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104613232023-08-29 Unmasking the Hidden Fetus: Introducing the Circled Delta Sign and Reversed Circled Delta Sign for Accurate Identification on Abdominal Radiography Ho, Hsing-Hao Tsai, Hsiu-Ting Am J Case Rep Articles Patient: Female, 41-year-old Final Diagnosis: Incidental pregnancy Symptoms: Postprandial abdominal pain and fullness for months Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Gastroenterology and Hepatology • Obstetrics and Gynecology • Radiology OBJECTIVE: Mistake in diagnosis BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation poses potential health risk to fetuses, including growth retardation, organ malformations, neurological effects, fetal death, and cancer. Therefore, pregnant women rarely undergo X-ray imaging, unless absolutely necessary. However, they can be inadvertently exposed to X-rays while undergoing an examination without being aware of their pregnancy. Given that the likelihood of a fetus appearing on an abdominal radiograph is low, physicians can be unfamiliar with the appearance of a fetus on such images. If a fetus incidentally appears on an abdominal radiograph, the clinician can encounter difficulties in identifying the fetus, potentially leading to unexpected harm during subsequent imaging procedures. CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old woman presented with symptoms of postprandial abdominal pain, abdominal fullness, and urinary frequency. Abdominal radiography revealed a large mass with calcifications in the pelvis and lower abdomen, raising suspicion of a large pelvic tumor, such as a teratoma. However, subsequent ultrasound unexpectedly revealed that the woman was actually 6 months pregnant. The presumed tumor was an enlarged uterus, and the presumed calcifications were the fetus’s bones. Before X-ray, the woman had denied being pregnant, mistakenly attributing her condition to excess weight and irregular menstrual cycles. Fortunately, the use of ultrasound instead of computed tomography prevented radiation exposure to the fetus, and the baby was delivered in a healthy state at full term. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid unintended harm to fetuses, clinicians should consider the possibility of pregnancy when evaluating a pelvic mass in women of childbearing age. To aid clinicians in accurately identifying fetuses on abdominal radiography and thereby reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosis, we propose the “circled delta sign” and the “reversed circled delta sign”. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10461323/ /pubmed/37621077 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.940689 Text en © Am J Case Rep, 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Articles
Ho, Hsing-Hao
Tsai, Hsiu-Ting
Unmasking the Hidden Fetus: Introducing the Circled Delta Sign and Reversed Circled Delta Sign for Accurate Identification on Abdominal Radiography
title Unmasking the Hidden Fetus: Introducing the Circled Delta Sign and Reversed Circled Delta Sign for Accurate Identification on Abdominal Radiography
title_full Unmasking the Hidden Fetus: Introducing the Circled Delta Sign and Reversed Circled Delta Sign for Accurate Identification on Abdominal Radiography
title_fullStr Unmasking the Hidden Fetus: Introducing the Circled Delta Sign and Reversed Circled Delta Sign for Accurate Identification on Abdominal Radiography
title_full_unstemmed Unmasking the Hidden Fetus: Introducing the Circled Delta Sign and Reversed Circled Delta Sign for Accurate Identification on Abdominal Radiography
title_short Unmasking the Hidden Fetus: Introducing the Circled Delta Sign and Reversed Circled Delta Sign for Accurate Identification on Abdominal Radiography
title_sort unmasking the hidden fetus: introducing the circled delta sign and reversed circled delta sign for accurate identification on abdominal radiography
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37621077
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.940689
work_keys_str_mv AT hohsinghao unmaskingthehiddenfetusintroducingthecircleddeltasignandreversedcircleddeltasignforaccurateidentificationonabdominalradiography
AT tsaihsiuting unmaskingthehiddenfetusintroducingthecircleddeltasignandreversedcircleddeltasignforaccurateidentificationonabdominalradiography