Cargando…

Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA

Compared with notifiable disease surveillance, claims-based algorithms estimate higher Lyme disease incidence, but their accuracy is unknown. We applied a previously developed Lyme disease algorithm (diagnosis code plus antimicrobial drug prescription dispensing within 30 days) to an administrative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cocoros, Noelle M., Kluberg, Sheryl A., Willis, Sarah J., Forrow, Susan, Gessner, Bradford D., Nutt, Cameron T., Cane, Alejandro, Petrou, Nathan, Sury, Meera, Rhee, Chanu, Jodar, Luis, Mendelsohn, Aaron, Hoffman, Emma R., Jin, Robert, Aucott, John, Pugh, Sarah J., Stark, James H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37610117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2909.221931
_version_ 1785097885329653760
author Cocoros, Noelle M.
Kluberg, Sheryl A.
Willis, Sarah J.
Forrow, Susan
Gessner, Bradford D.
Nutt, Cameron T.
Cane, Alejandro
Petrou, Nathan
Sury, Meera
Rhee, Chanu
Jodar, Luis
Mendelsohn, Aaron
Hoffman, Emma R.
Jin, Robert
Aucott, John
Pugh, Sarah J.
Stark, James H.
author_facet Cocoros, Noelle M.
Kluberg, Sheryl A.
Willis, Sarah J.
Forrow, Susan
Gessner, Bradford D.
Nutt, Cameron T.
Cane, Alejandro
Petrou, Nathan
Sury, Meera
Rhee, Chanu
Jodar, Luis
Mendelsohn, Aaron
Hoffman, Emma R.
Jin, Robert
Aucott, John
Pugh, Sarah J.
Stark, James H.
author_sort Cocoros, Noelle M.
collection PubMed
description Compared with notifiable disease surveillance, claims-based algorithms estimate higher Lyme disease incidence, but their accuracy is unknown. We applied a previously developed Lyme disease algorithm (diagnosis code plus antimicrobial drug prescription dispensing within 30 days) to an administrative claims database in Massachusetts, USA, to identify a Lyme disease cohort during July 2000–June 2019. Clinicians reviewed and adjudicated medical charts from a cohort subset by using national surveillance case definitions. We calculated positive predictive values (PPVs). We identified 12,229 Lyme disease episodes in the claims database and reviewed and adjudicated 128 medical charts. The algorithmʼs PPV for confirmed, probable, or suspected cases was 93.8% (95% CI 88.1%–97.3%); the PPV was 66.4% (95% CI 57.5%–74.5%) for confirmed and probable cases only. In a high incidence setting, a claims-based algorithm identified cases with a high PPV, suggesting it can be used to assess Lyme disease burden and supplement traditional surveillance data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10461665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104616652023-09-01 Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA Cocoros, Noelle M. Kluberg, Sheryl A. Willis, Sarah J. Forrow, Susan Gessner, Bradford D. Nutt, Cameron T. Cane, Alejandro Petrou, Nathan Sury, Meera Rhee, Chanu Jodar, Luis Mendelsohn, Aaron Hoffman, Emma R. Jin, Robert Aucott, John Pugh, Sarah J. Stark, James H. Emerg Infect Dis Research Compared with notifiable disease surveillance, claims-based algorithms estimate higher Lyme disease incidence, but their accuracy is unknown. We applied a previously developed Lyme disease algorithm (diagnosis code plus antimicrobial drug prescription dispensing within 30 days) to an administrative claims database in Massachusetts, USA, to identify a Lyme disease cohort during July 2000–June 2019. Clinicians reviewed and adjudicated medical charts from a cohort subset by using national surveillance case definitions. We calculated positive predictive values (PPVs). We identified 12,229 Lyme disease episodes in the claims database and reviewed and adjudicated 128 medical charts. The algorithmʼs PPV for confirmed, probable, or suspected cases was 93.8% (95% CI 88.1%–97.3%); the PPV was 66.4% (95% CI 57.5%–74.5%) for confirmed and probable cases only. In a high incidence setting, a claims-based algorithm identified cases with a high PPV, suggesting it can be used to assess Lyme disease burden and supplement traditional surveillance data. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10461665/ /pubmed/37610117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2909.221931 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Emerging Infectious Diseases is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Cocoros, Noelle M.
Kluberg, Sheryl A.
Willis, Sarah J.
Forrow, Susan
Gessner, Bradford D.
Nutt, Cameron T.
Cane, Alejandro
Petrou, Nathan
Sury, Meera
Rhee, Chanu
Jodar, Luis
Mendelsohn, Aaron
Hoffman, Emma R.
Jin, Robert
Aucott, John
Pugh, Sarah J.
Stark, James H.
Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA
title Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA
title_full Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA
title_fullStr Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA
title_short Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA
title_sort validation of claims-based algorithm for lyme disease, massachusetts, usa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37610117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2909.221931
work_keys_str_mv AT cocorosnoellem validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT klubergsheryla validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT willissarahj validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT forrowsusan validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT gessnerbradfordd validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT nuttcameront validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT canealejandro validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT petrounathan validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT surymeera validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT rheechanu validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT jodarluis validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT mendelsohnaaron validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT hoffmanemmar validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT jinrobert validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT aucottjohn validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT pughsarahj validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa
AT starkjamesh validationofclaimsbasedalgorithmforlymediseasemassachusettsusa