Cargando…

The pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome are common with clinically significant consequences. We investigated the pathophysiological effects of raised IAP as part of a more extensive exploratory animal study. The study design included both pneumoperitoneum and mech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wise, Robert, Rodseth, Reitze, Párraga-Ros, Ester, Latorre, Rafael, López Albors, Octavio, Correa-Martín, Laura, M. Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco, Eugenia Candanosa-Aranda, Irma, Poelaert, Jan, Castellanos, Gregorio, L. N. G. Malbrain, Manu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37639437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290451
_version_ 1785097917489479680
author Wise, Robert
Rodseth, Reitze
Párraga-Ros, Ester
Latorre, Rafael
López Albors, Octavio
Correa-Martín, Laura
M. Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco
Eugenia Candanosa-Aranda, Irma
Poelaert, Jan
Castellanos, Gregorio
L. N. G. Malbrain, Manu
author_facet Wise, Robert
Rodseth, Reitze
Párraga-Ros, Ester
Latorre, Rafael
López Albors, Octavio
Correa-Martín, Laura
M. Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco
Eugenia Candanosa-Aranda, Irma
Poelaert, Jan
Castellanos, Gregorio
L. N. G. Malbrain, Manu
author_sort Wise, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome are common with clinically significant consequences. We investigated the pathophysiological effects of raised IAP as part of a more extensive exploratory animal study. The study design included both pneumoperitoneum and mechanical intestinal obstruction models. METHODS: Forty-nine female swine were divided into six groups: a control group (Cr; n = 5), three pneumoperitoneum groups with IAPs of 20mmHg (Pn20; n = 10), 30mmHg (Pn30; n = 10), 40mmHg (Pn40; n = 10), and two mechanical intestinal occlusion groups with IAPs of 20mmHg (MIO20; n = 9) and 30mmHg (MIO30; n = 5). RESULTS: There were significant changes (p<0.05) noted in all organ systems, most notably systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p<0.001), cardiac index (CI) (p = 0.003), stroke volume index (SVI) (p<0.001), mean pulmonary airway pressure (MPP) (p<0.001), compliance (p<0.001), pO2 (p = 0.003), bicarbonate (p = 0.041), hemoglobin (p = 0.012), lipase (p = 0.041), total bilirubin (p = 0.041), gastric pH (p<0.001), calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p<0.001), and urine output (p<0.001). SVV increased progressively as the IAP increased with no obvious changes in intravascular volume status. There were no significant differences between the models regarding their impact on cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and gastrointestinal systems. However, significant differences were noted between the two models at 30mmHg, with MIO30 showing worse metabolic and hematological parameters, and Pn30 and Pn40 showing a more rapid rise in creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified and quantified the impact of intra-abdominal hypertension at different pressures on several organ systems and highlighted the significance of even short-lived elevations. Two models of intra-abdominal pressure were used, with a mechanical obstruction model showing more rapid changes in metabolic and haematological changes. These may represent different underlying cellular and vascular pathophysiological processes, but this remains unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10461824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104618242023-08-29 The pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs Wise, Robert Rodseth, Reitze Párraga-Ros, Ester Latorre, Rafael López Albors, Octavio Correa-Martín, Laura M. Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco Eugenia Candanosa-Aranda, Irma Poelaert, Jan Castellanos, Gregorio L. N. G. Malbrain, Manu PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome are common with clinically significant consequences. We investigated the pathophysiological effects of raised IAP as part of a more extensive exploratory animal study. The study design included both pneumoperitoneum and mechanical intestinal obstruction models. METHODS: Forty-nine female swine were divided into six groups: a control group (Cr; n = 5), three pneumoperitoneum groups with IAPs of 20mmHg (Pn20; n = 10), 30mmHg (Pn30; n = 10), 40mmHg (Pn40; n = 10), and two mechanical intestinal occlusion groups with IAPs of 20mmHg (MIO20; n = 9) and 30mmHg (MIO30; n = 5). RESULTS: There were significant changes (p<0.05) noted in all organ systems, most notably systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p<0.001), cardiac index (CI) (p = 0.003), stroke volume index (SVI) (p<0.001), mean pulmonary airway pressure (MPP) (p<0.001), compliance (p<0.001), pO2 (p = 0.003), bicarbonate (p = 0.041), hemoglobin (p = 0.012), lipase (p = 0.041), total bilirubin (p = 0.041), gastric pH (p<0.001), calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p<0.001), and urine output (p<0.001). SVV increased progressively as the IAP increased with no obvious changes in intravascular volume status. There were no significant differences between the models regarding their impact on cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and gastrointestinal systems. However, significant differences were noted between the two models at 30mmHg, with MIO30 showing worse metabolic and hematological parameters, and Pn30 and Pn40 showing a more rapid rise in creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified and quantified the impact of intra-abdominal hypertension at different pressures on several organ systems and highlighted the significance of even short-lived elevations. Two models of intra-abdominal pressure were used, with a mechanical obstruction model showing more rapid changes in metabolic and haematological changes. These may represent different underlying cellular and vascular pathophysiological processes, but this remains unclear. Public Library of Science 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10461824/ /pubmed/37639437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290451 Text en © 2023 Wise et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wise, Robert
Rodseth, Reitze
Párraga-Ros, Ester
Latorre, Rafael
López Albors, Octavio
Correa-Martín, Laura
M. Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco
Eugenia Candanosa-Aranda, Irma
Poelaert, Jan
Castellanos, Gregorio
L. N. G. Malbrain, Manu
The pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs
title The pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs
title_full The pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs
title_fullStr The pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs
title_full_unstemmed The pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs
title_short The pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs
title_sort pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37639437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290451
work_keys_str_mv AT wiserobert thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT rodsethreitze thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT parragarosester thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT latorrerafael thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT lopezalborsoctavio thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT correamartinlaura thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT msanchezmargallofrancisco thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT eugeniacandanosaarandairma thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT poelaertjan thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT castellanosgregorio thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT lngmalbrainmanu thepathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT wiserobert pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT rodsethreitze pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT parragarosester pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT latorrerafael pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT lopezalborsoctavio pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT correamartinlaura pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT msanchezmargallofrancisco pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT eugeniacandanosaarandairma pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT poelaertjan pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT castellanosgregorio pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs
AT lngmalbrainmanu pathophysiologicalimpactofintraabdominalhypertensioninpigs