Cargando…

TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly deployed in the treatment of neuropsychiatric illness, under the presumption that stimulation of specific cortical targets can alter ongoing neural activity and cause circuit-level changes in brain function. While the electrophysiological effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solomon, Ethan A., Wang, Jeffrey B., Oya, Hiroyuki, Howard, Matthew A., Trapp, Nicholas T., Uitermarkt, Brandt D., Boes, Aaron D., Keller, Corey J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.09.552524
_version_ 1785145943199318016
author Solomon, Ethan A.
Wang, Jeffrey B.
Oya, Hiroyuki
Howard, Matthew A.
Trapp, Nicholas T.
Uitermarkt, Brandt D.
Boes, Aaron D.
Keller, Corey J.
author_facet Solomon, Ethan A.
Wang, Jeffrey B.
Oya, Hiroyuki
Howard, Matthew A.
Trapp, Nicholas T.
Uitermarkt, Brandt D.
Boes, Aaron D.
Keller, Corey J.
author_sort Solomon, Ethan A.
collection PubMed
description Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly deployed in the treatment of neuropsychiatric illness, under the presumption that stimulation of specific cortical targets can alter ongoing neural activity and cause circuit-level changes in brain function. While the electrophysiological effects of TMS have been extensively studied with scalp electroencephalography (EEG), this approach is most useful for evaluating low-frequency neural activity at the cortical surface. As such, little is known about how TMS perturbs rhythmic activity among deeper structures – such as the hippocampus and amygdala – and whether stimulation can alter higher-frequency oscillations. Recent work has established that TMS can be safely used in patients with intracranial electrodes (iEEG), allowing for direct neural recordings at sufficient spatiotemporal resolution to examine localized oscillatory responses across the frequency spectrum. To that end, we recruited 17 neurosurgical patients with indwelling electrodes and recorded neural activity while patients underwent repeated trials of single-pulse TMS at several cortical sites. Stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) drove widespread low-frequency increases (3-8Hz) in frontolimbic cortices, as well as high-frequency decreases (30-110Hz) in frontotemporal areas, including the hippocampus. Stimulation to parietal cortex specifically provoked low-frequency responses in the medial temporal lobe. While most low-frequency activity was consistent with brief evoked responses, anterior frontal regions exhibited induced theta oscillations following DLPFC stimulation. Taken together, we established that non-invasive stimulation can (1) provoke a mixture of low-frequency evoked power and induced theta oscillations and (2) suppress high-frequency activity in deeper brain structures not directly accessed by stimulation itself.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10461914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104619142023-11-20 TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites Solomon, Ethan A. Wang, Jeffrey B. Oya, Hiroyuki Howard, Matthew A. Trapp, Nicholas T. Uitermarkt, Brandt D. Boes, Aaron D. Keller, Corey J. bioRxiv Article Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly deployed in the treatment of neuropsychiatric illness, under the presumption that stimulation of specific cortical targets can alter ongoing neural activity and cause circuit-level changes in brain function. While the electrophysiological effects of TMS have been extensively studied with scalp electroencephalography (EEG), this approach is most useful for evaluating low-frequency neural activity at the cortical surface. As such, little is known about how TMS perturbs rhythmic activity among deeper structures – such as the hippocampus and amygdala – and whether stimulation can alter higher-frequency oscillations. Recent work has established that TMS can be safely used in patients with intracranial electrodes (iEEG), allowing for direct neural recordings at sufficient spatiotemporal resolution to examine localized oscillatory responses across the frequency spectrum. To that end, we recruited 17 neurosurgical patients with indwelling electrodes and recorded neural activity while patients underwent repeated trials of single-pulse TMS at several cortical sites. Stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) drove widespread low-frequency increases (3-8Hz) in frontolimbic cortices, as well as high-frequency decreases (30-110Hz) in frontotemporal areas, including the hippocampus. Stimulation to parietal cortex specifically provoked low-frequency responses in the medial temporal lobe. While most low-frequency activity was consistent with brief evoked responses, anterior frontal regions exhibited induced theta oscillations following DLPFC stimulation. Taken together, we established that non-invasive stimulation can (1) provoke a mixture of low-frequency evoked power and induced theta oscillations and (2) suppress high-frequency activity in deeper brain structures not directly accessed by stimulation itself. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10461914/ /pubmed/37645954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.09.552524 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Solomon, Ethan A.
Wang, Jeffrey B.
Oya, Hiroyuki
Howard, Matthew A.
Trapp, Nicholas T.
Uitermarkt, Brandt D.
Boes, Aaron D.
Keller, Corey J.
TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites
title TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites
title_full TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites
title_fullStr TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites
title_full_unstemmed TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites
title_short TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites
title_sort tms provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.09.552524
work_keys_str_mv AT solomonethana tmsprovokestargetdependentintracranialrhythmsacrosshumancorticalandsubcorticalsites
AT wangjeffreyb tmsprovokestargetdependentintracranialrhythmsacrosshumancorticalandsubcorticalsites
AT oyahiroyuki tmsprovokestargetdependentintracranialrhythmsacrosshumancorticalandsubcorticalsites
AT howardmatthewa tmsprovokestargetdependentintracranialrhythmsacrosshumancorticalandsubcorticalsites
AT trappnicholast tmsprovokestargetdependentintracranialrhythmsacrosshumancorticalandsubcorticalsites
AT uitermarktbrandtd tmsprovokestargetdependentintracranialrhythmsacrosshumancorticalandsubcorticalsites
AT boesaarond tmsprovokestargetdependentintracranialrhythmsacrosshumancorticalandsubcorticalsites
AT kellercoreyj tmsprovokestargetdependentintracranialrhythmsacrosshumancorticalandsubcorticalsites