Cargando…

Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography With Angle Correction As a Screening Tool for Raised Intracranial Pressure

OBJECTIVES: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been evaluated as a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) assessment tool. Correction for insonation angle, a potential source of error, with transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) has not previously been reported while evaluating ICP with TCD. Our ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajajee, Venkatakrishna, Soroushmehr, Reza, Williamson, Craig A., Najarian, Kayvan, Ward, Kevin, Tiba, Hakam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000953
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been evaluated as a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) assessment tool. Correction for insonation angle, a potential source of error, with transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) has not previously been reported while evaluating ICP with TCD. Our objective was to study the accuracy of TCCS for detection of ICP elevation, with and without the use of angle correction. DESIGN: Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. SETTING: Academic neurocritical care unit. PATIENTS: Consecutive adults with invasive ICP monitors. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound assessment with TCCS. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: End-diastolic velocity (EDV), time-averaged peak velocity (TAPV), and pulsatility index (PI) were measured in the bilateral middle cerebral arteries with and without angle correction. Concomitant mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP were recorded. Estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as estimated CPP (CPPe) = MAP × (EDV/TAPV) + 14, and estimated ICP (ICPe) = MAP–CPPe. Sixty patients were enrolled and 55 underwent TCCS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of ICPe for detection of invasive ICP greater than 22 mm Hg revealed area under the curve (AUC) 0.51 (0.37–0.64) without angle correction and 0.73 (0.58–0.84) with angle correction. The optimal threshold without angle correction was ICPe greater than 18 mm Hg with sensitivity 71% (29–96%) and specificity 28% (16–43%). With angle correction, the optimal threshold was ICPe greater than 21 mm Hg with sensitivity 100% (54–100%) and specificity 30% (17–46%). The AUC for PI was 0.61 (0.47–0.74) without angle correction and 0.70 (0.55–0.92) with angle correction. CONCLUSIONS: Angle correction improved the accuracy of TCCS for detection of elevated ICP. Sensitivity was high, as appropriate for a screening tool, but specificity remained low.