Cargando…

Are Patients With an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition Discharge Diagnosis Code for Sepsis Different in Regard to Demographics and Outcome Variables When Comparing Those With Sepsis Only to Those Also Diagnosed With COVID-19 or Those With a COVID-19 Diagnosis Alone?

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed whether patients with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) discharge diagnosis code for sepsis are different in regard to demographics and outcome variables when comparing those with sepsis only to those also diagnosed with COVID-19 or those wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaieski, David F., Tsukuda, Jumpei, Maddox, Parker, Li, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000964
_version_ 1785097957302861824
author Gaieski, David F.
Tsukuda, Jumpei
Maddox, Parker
Li, Michael
author_facet Gaieski, David F.
Tsukuda, Jumpei
Maddox, Parker
Li, Michael
author_sort Gaieski, David F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We analyzed whether patients with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) discharge diagnosis code for sepsis are different in regard to demographics and outcome variables when comparing those with sepsis only to those also diagnosed with COVID-19 or those with a COVID-19 diagnosis alone. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nine hospitals in an academic health system. PATIENTS: Patients with a final ICD-10 discharge diagnostic code for sepsis only, a diagnosis of COVID-19-only, or a final sepsis ICD-10 discharge code + a diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to the hospital were analyzed for demographic and outcome differences between the cohorts. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 11,395 patients met inclusion criteria: 6,945 patients (60.9%) were ICD-10 sepsis code only, 3,294 patients (28.9%) were COVID-19 diagnosis-only, and 1,153 patients (10.1%) were sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis. Comparing sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis patients to sepsis ICD-10 code only and COVID-19 diagnosis-only patients, the sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis patients were: older (69 [58–78] vs 67 [56–77] vs 64 [51–76] yr), less likely to be female (40.3% vs 46.7% vs 49.5%), more frequently admitted to the ICU (59.3% [684/1,153] vs 54.9% [1,810/3,297] vs 15% [1,042/6,945]), more frequently required ventilatory support (39.3% [453/1,153] vs 31.8% [1,049/3,297] vs 6.0% [417/6,945]), had longer median hospital length of stay (9 [5,16] vs 5 [3,8] vs 7. [4,13] d), and were more likely to die in the hospital (39.2% [452/1,153] vs 22.3% [735/3,297] vs 6.4% [444/6,945]). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic the sickest cohort of patients was those receiving an explicit ICD-10 code of sepsis + a COVID-19 diagnosis. A significant percentage of COVID-19 diagnosis-only patients appear to have been under-coded as they received a level of critical care (ICU admission; intubation) suggestive of the presence of acute organ dysfunction during their admission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10461943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104619432023-08-29 Are Patients With an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition Discharge Diagnosis Code for Sepsis Different in Regard to Demographics and Outcome Variables When Comparing Those With Sepsis Only to Those Also Diagnosed With COVID-19 or Those With a COVID-19 Diagnosis Alone? Gaieski, David F. Tsukuda, Jumpei Maddox, Parker Li, Michael Crit Care Explor Observational Study OBJECTIVES: We analyzed whether patients with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) discharge diagnosis code for sepsis are different in regard to demographics and outcome variables when comparing those with sepsis only to those also diagnosed with COVID-19 or those with a COVID-19 diagnosis alone. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nine hospitals in an academic health system. PATIENTS: Patients with a final ICD-10 discharge diagnostic code for sepsis only, a diagnosis of COVID-19-only, or a final sepsis ICD-10 discharge code + a diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to the hospital were analyzed for demographic and outcome differences between the cohorts. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 11,395 patients met inclusion criteria: 6,945 patients (60.9%) were ICD-10 sepsis code only, 3,294 patients (28.9%) were COVID-19 diagnosis-only, and 1,153 patients (10.1%) were sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis. Comparing sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis patients to sepsis ICD-10 code only and COVID-19 diagnosis-only patients, the sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis patients were: older (69 [58–78] vs 67 [56–77] vs 64 [51–76] yr), less likely to be female (40.3% vs 46.7% vs 49.5%), more frequently admitted to the ICU (59.3% [684/1,153] vs 54.9% [1,810/3,297] vs 15% [1,042/6,945]), more frequently required ventilatory support (39.3% [453/1,153] vs 31.8% [1,049/3,297] vs 6.0% [417/6,945]), had longer median hospital length of stay (9 [5,16] vs 5 [3,8] vs 7. [4,13] d), and were more likely to die in the hospital (39.2% [452/1,153] vs 22.3% [735/3,297] vs 6.4% [444/6,945]). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic the sickest cohort of patients was those receiving an explicit ICD-10 code of sepsis + a COVID-19 diagnosis. A significant percentage of COVID-19 diagnosis-only patients appear to have been under-coded as they received a level of critical care (ICU admission; intubation) suggestive of the presence of acute organ dysfunction during their admission. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10461943/ /pubmed/37644976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000964 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Gaieski, David F.
Tsukuda, Jumpei
Maddox, Parker
Li, Michael
Are Patients With an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition Discharge Diagnosis Code for Sepsis Different in Regard to Demographics and Outcome Variables When Comparing Those With Sepsis Only to Those Also Diagnosed With COVID-19 or Those With a COVID-19 Diagnosis Alone?
title Are Patients With an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition Discharge Diagnosis Code for Sepsis Different in Regard to Demographics and Outcome Variables When Comparing Those With Sepsis Only to Those Also Diagnosed With COVID-19 or Those With a COVID-19 Diagnosis Alone?
title_full Are Patients With an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition Discharge Diagnosis Code for Sepsis Different in Regard to Demographics and Outcome Variables When Comparing Those With Sepsis Only to Those Also Diagnosed With COVID-19 or Those With a COVID-19 Diagnosis Alone?
title_fullStr Are Patients With an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition Discharge Diagnosis Code for Sepsis Different in Regard to Demographics and Outcome Variables When Comparing Those With Sepsis Only to Those Also Diagnosed With COVID-19 or Those With a COVID-19 Diagnosis Alone?
title_full_unstemmed Are Patients With an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition Discharge Diagnosis Code for Sepsis Different in Regard to Demographics and Outcome Variables When Comparing Those With Sepsis Only to Those Also Diagnosed With COVID-19 or Those With a COVID-19 Diagnosis Alone?
title_short Are Patients With an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition Discharge Diagnosis Code for Sepsis Different in Regard to Demographics and Outcome Variables When Comparing Those With Sepsis Only to Those Also Diagnosed With COVID-19 or Those With a COVID-19 Diagnosis Alone?
title_sort are patients with an international classification of diseases, 10th edition discharge diagnosis code for sepsis different in regard to demographics and outcome variables when comparing those with sepsis only to those also diagnosed with covid-19 or those with a covid-19 diagnosis alone?
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000964
work_keys_str_mv AT gaieskidavidf arepatientswithaninternationalclassificationofdiseases10theditiondischargediagnosiscodeforsepsisdifferentinregardtodemographicsandoutcomevariableswhencomparingthosewithsepsisonlytothosealsodiagnosedwithcovid19orthosewithacovid19diagnosisalone
AT tsukudajumpei arepatientswithaninternationalclassificationofdiseases10theditiondischargediagnosiscodeforsepsisdifferentinregardtodemographicsandoutcomevariableswhencomparingthosewithsepsisonlytothosealsodiagnosedwithcovid19orthosewithacovid19diagnosisalone
AT maddoxparker arepatientswithaninternationalclassificationofdiseases10theditiondischargediagnosiscodeforsepsisdifferentinregardtodemographicsandoutcomevariableswhencomparingthosewithsepsisonlytothosealsodiagnosedwithcovid19orthosewithacovid19diagnosisalone
AT limichael arepatientswithaninternationalclassificationofdiseases10theditiondischargediagnosiscodeforsepsisdifferentinregardtodemographicsandoutcomevariableswhencomparingthosewithsepsisonlytothosealsodiagnosedwithcovid19orthosewithacovid19diagnosisalone