Cargando…

Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach

OBJECTIVES: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used in various aspects of healthcare to improve clinical decision-making, including in the ICU. However, there is growing evidence that CDSS are not used to their full potential, often resulting in alert fatigue which has been associated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Adrian, Berenbrok, Lucas A., Snader, Lauren, Soh, Yu Hyeon, Kumar, Vishakha K., Javed, Muhammad Ali, Bates, David W., Sorce, Lauren R., Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967
_version_ 1785097961746726912
author Wong, Adrian
Berenbrok, Lucas A.
Snader, Lauren
Soh, Yu Hyeon
Kumar, Vishakha K.
Javed, Muhammad Ali
Bates, David W.
Sorce, Lauren R.
Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
author_facet Wong, Adrian
Berenbrok, Lucas A.
Snader, Lauren
Soh, Yu Hyeon
Kumar, Vishakha K.
Javed, Muhammad Ali
Bates, David W.
Sorce, Lauren R.
Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
author_sort Wong, Adrian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used in various aspects of healthcare to improve clinical decision-making, including in the ICU. However, there is growing evidence that CDSS are not used to their full potential, often resulting in alert fatigue which has been associated with patient harm. Clinicians in the ICU may be more vulnerable to desensitization of alerts than clinicians in less urgent parts of the hospital. We evaluated facilitators and barriers to appropriate CDSS interaction and provide methods to improve currently available CDSS in the ICU. DESIGN: Sequential explanatory mixed-methods study design, using the BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework. SETTING: International survey study. PATIENT/SUBJECTS: Clinicians (pharmacists, physicians) identified via survey, with recent experience with clinical decision support. INTERVENTIONS: An initial survey was developed to evaluate clinician perspectives on their interactions with CDSS. A subsequent in-depth interview was developed to further evaluate clinician (pharmacist, physician) beliefs and behaviors about CDSS. These interviews were then qualitatively analyzed to determine themes of facilitators and barriers with CDSS interactions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 48 respondents completed the initial survey (estimated response rate 15.5%). The majority believed that responding to CDSS alerts was part of their job (75%) but felt they experienced alert fatigue (56.5%). In the qualitative analysis, a total of five facilitators (patient safety, ease of response, specificity, prioritization, and feedback) and four barriers (excess quantity, work environment, difficulty in response, and irrelevance) were identified from the in-depth interviews. CONCLUSIONS: In this mixed-methods survey, we identified areas that institutions should focus on to improve appropriate clinician interactions with CDSS, specific to the ICU. Tailoring of CDSS to the ICU may lead to improvement in CDSS and subsequent improved patient safety outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10461946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104619462023-08-29 Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach Wong, Adrian Berenbrok, Lucas A. Snader, Lauren Soh, Yu Hyeon Kumar, Vishakha K. Javed, Muhammad Ali Bates, David W. Sorce, Lauren R. Kane-Gill, Sandra L. Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report OBJECTIVES: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used in various aspects of healthcare to improve clinical decision-making, including in the ICU. However, there is growing evidence that CDSS are not used to their full potential, often resulting in alert fatigue which has been associated with patient harm. Clinicians in the ICU may be more vulnerable to desensitization of alerts than clinicians in less urgent parts of the hospital. We evaluated facilitators and barriers to appropriate CDSS interaction and provide methods to improve currently available CDSS in the ICU. DESIGN: Sequential explanatory mixed-methods study design, using the BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework. SETTING: International survey study. PATIENT/SUBJECTS: Clinicians (pharmacists, physicians) identified via survey, with recent experience with clinical decision support. INTERVENTIONS: An initial survey was developed to evaluate clinician perspectives on their interactions with CDSS. A subsequent in-depth interview was developed to further evaluate clinician (pharmacist, physician) beliefs and behaviors about CDSS. These interviews were then qualitatively analyzed to determine themes of facilitators and barriers with CDSS interactions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 48 respondents completed the initial survey (estimated response rate 15.5%). The majority believed that responding to CDSS alerts was part of their job (75%) but felt they experienced alert fatigue (56.5%). In the qualitative analysis, a total of five facilitators (patient safety, ease of response, specificity, prioritization, and feedback) and four barriers (excess quantity, work environment, difficulty in response, and irrelevance) were identified from the in-depth interviews. CONCLUSIONS: In this mixed-methods survey, we identified areas that institutions should focus on to improve appropriate clinician interactions with CDSS, specific to the ICU. Tailoring of CDSS to the ICU may lead to improvement in CDSS and subsequent improved patient safety outcomes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10461946/ /pubmed/37644969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Report
Wong, Adrian
Berenbrok, Lucas A.
Snader, Lauren
Soh, Yu Hyeon
Kumar, Vishakha K.
Javed, Muhammad Ali
Bates, David W.
Sorce, Lauren R.
Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach
title Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach
title_full Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach
title_fullStr Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach
title_full_unstemmed Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach
title_short Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach
title_sort facilitators and barriers to interacting with clinical decision support in the icu: a mixed-methods approach
topic Original Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967
work_keys_str_mv AT wongadrian facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach
AT berenbroklucasa facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach
AT snaderlauren facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach
AT sohyuhyeon facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach
AT kumarvishakhak facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach
AT javedmuhammadali facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach
AT batesdavidw facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach
AT sorcelaurenr facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach
AT kanegillsandral facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach