Cargando…
Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach
OBJECTIVES: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used in various aspects of healthcare to improve clinical decision-making, including in the ICU. However, there is growing evidence that CDSS are not used to their full potential, often resulting in alert fatigue which has been associated wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967 |
_version_ | 1785097961746726912 |
---|---|
author | Wong, Adrian Berenbrok, Lucas A. Snader, Lauren Soh, Yu Hyeon Kumar, Vishakha K. Javed, Muhammad Ali Bates, David W. Sorce, Lauren R. Kane-Gill, Sandra L. |
author_facet | Wong, Adrian Berenbrok, Lucas A. Snader, Lauren Soh, Yu Hyeon Kumar, Vishakha K. Javed, Muhammad Ali Bates, David W. Sorce, Lauren R. Kane-Gill, Sandra L. |
author_sort | Wong, Adrian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used in various aspects of healthcare to improve clinical decision-making, including in the ICU. However, there is growing evidence that CDSS are not used to their full potential, often resulting in alert fatigue which has been associated with patient harm. Clinicians in the ICU may be more vulnerable to desensitization of alerts than clinicians in less urgent parts of the hospital. We evaluated facilitators and barriers to appropriate CDSS interaction and provide methods to improve currently available CDSS in the ICU. DESIGN: Sequential explanatory mixed-methods study design, using the BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework. SETTING: International survey study. PATIENT/SUBJECTS: Clinicians (pharmacists, physicians) identified via survey, with recent experience with clinical decision support. INTERVENTIONS: An initial survey was developed to evaluate clinician perspectives on their interactions with CDSS. A subsequent in-depth interview was developed to further evaluate clinician (pharmacist, physician) beliefs and behaviors about CDSS. These interviews were then qualitatively analyzed to determine themes of facilitators and barriers with CDSS interactions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 48 respondents completed the initial survey (estimated response rate 15.5%). The majority believed that responding to CDSS alerts was part of their job (75%) but felt they experienced alert fatigue (56.5%). In the qualitative analysis, a total of five facilitators (patient safety, ease of response, specificity, prioritization, and feedback) and four barriers (excess quantity, work environment, difficulty in response, and irrelevance) were identified from the in-depth interviews. CONCLUSIONS: In this mixed-methods survey, we identified areas that institutions should focus on to improve appropriate clinician interactions with CDSS, specific to the ICU. Tailoring of CDSS to the ICU may lead to improvement in CDSS and subsequent improved patient safety outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10461946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104619462023-08-29 Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach Wong, Adrian Berenbrok, Lucas A. Snader, Lauren Soh, Yu Hyeon Kumar, Vishakha K. Javed, Muhammad Ali Bates, David W. Sorce, Lauren R. Kane-Gill, Sandra L. Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report OBJECTIVES: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used in various aspects of healthcare to improve clinical decision-making, including in the ICU. However, there is growing evidence that CDSS are not used to their full potential, often resulting in alert fatigue which has been associated with patient harm. Clinicians in the ICU may be more vulnerable to desensitization of alerts than clinicians in less urgent parts of the hospital. We evaluated facilitators and barriers to appropriate CDSS interaction and provide methods to improve currently available CDSS in the ICU. DESIGN: Sequential explanatory mixed-methods study design, using the BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework. SETTING: International survey study. PATIENT/SUBJECTS: Clinicians (pharmacists, physicians) identified via survey, with recent experience with clinical decision support. INTERVENTIONS: An initial survey was developed to evaluate clinician perspectives on their interactions with CDSS. A subsequent in-depth interview was developed to further evaluate clinician (pharmacist, physician) beliefs and behaviors about CDSS. These interviews were then qualitatively analyzed to determine themes of facilitators and barriers with CDSS interactions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 48 respondents completed the initial survey (estimated response rate 15.5%). The majority believed that responding to CDSS alerts was part of their job (75%) but felt they experienced alert fatigue (56.5%). In the qualitative analysis, a total of five facilitators (patient safety, ease of response, specificity, prioritization, and feedback) and four barriers (excess quantity, work environment, difficulty in response, and irrelevance) were identified from the in-depth interviews. CONCLUSIONS: In this mixed-methods survey, we identified areas that institutions should focus on to improve appropriate clinician interactions with CDSS, specific to the ICU. Tailoring of CDSS to the ICU may lead to improvement in CDSS and subsequent improved patient safety outcomes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10461946/ /pubmed/37644969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Clinical Report Wong, Adrian Berenbrok, Lucas A. Snader, Lauren Soh, Yu Hyeon Kumar, Vishakha K. Javed, Muhammad Ali Bates, David W. Sorce, Lauren R. Kane-Gill, Sandra L. Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach |
title | Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach |
title_full | Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach |
title_fullStr | Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach |
title_short | Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach |
title_sort | facilitators and barriers to interacting with clinical decision support in the icu: a mixed-methods approach |
topic | Original Clinical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongadrian facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach AT berenbroklucasa facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach AT snaderlauren facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach AT sohyuhyeon facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach AT kumarvishakhak facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach AT javedmuhammadali facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach AT batesdavidw facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach AT sorcelaurenr facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach AT kanegillsandral facilitatorsandbarrierstointeractingwithclinicaldecisionsupportintheicuamixedmethodsapproach |