Cargando…
Replication and Refinement of Brain Age Model for adolescent development
The discrepancy between chronological age and estimated brain age, known as the brain age gap, may serve as a biomarker to reveal brain development and neuropsychiatric problems. This has motivated many studies focusing on the accurate estimation of brain age using different features and models, of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.16.553472 |
_version_ | 1785097982172987392 |
---|---|
author | Ray, Bhaskar Chen, Jiayu Fu, Zening Suresh, Pranav Thapaliya, Bishal Farahdel, Britny Calhoun, Vince D. Liu, Jingyu |
author_facet | Ray, Bhaskar Chen, Jiayu Fu, Zening Suresh, Pranav Thapaliya, Bishal Farahdel, Britny Calhoun, Vince D. Liu, Jingyu |
author_sort | Ray, Bhaskar |
collection | PubMed |
description | The discrepancy between chronological age and estimated brain age, known as the brain age gap, may serve as a biomarker to reveal brain development and neuropsychiatric problems. This has motivated many studies focusing on the accurate estimation of brain age using different features and models, of which the generalizability is yet to be tested. Our recent study has demonstrated that conventional machine learning models can achieve high accuracy on brain age prediction during development using only a small set of selected features from multimodal brain imaging data. In the current study, we tested the replicability of various brain age models on the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort. We proposed a new refined model to improve the robustness of brain age prediction. The direct replication test for existing brain age models derived from the age range of 8-22 years onto the ABCD participants at baseline (9 to 10 years old) and year-two follow-up (11 to 12 years old) indicate that pre-trained models could capture the overall mean age failed precisely estimating brain age variation within a narrow range. The refined model, which combined broad prediction of the pre-trained model and granular information with the narrow age range, achieved the best performance with a mean absolute error of 0.49 and 0.48 years on the baseline and year-two data, respectively. The brain age gap yielded by the refined model showed significant associations with the participants’ information processing speed and verbal comprehension ability on baseline data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10462059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104620592023-08-29 Replication and Refinement of Brain Age Model for adolescent development Ray, Bhaskar Chen, Jiayu Fu, Zening Suresh, Pranav Thapaliya, Bishal Farahdel, Britny Calhoun, Vince D. Liu, Jingyu bioRxiv Article The discrepancy between chronological age and estimated brain age, known as the brain age gap, may serve as a biomarker to reveal brain development and neuropsychiatric problems. This has motivated many studies focusing on the accurate estimation of brain age using different features and models, of which the generalizability is yet to be tested. Our recent study has demonstrated that conventional machine learning models can achieve high accuracy on brain age prediction during development using only a small set of selected features from multimodal brain imaging data. In the current study, we tested the replicability of various brain age models on the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort. We proposed a new refined model to improve the robustness of brain age prediction. The direct replication test for existing brain age models derived from the age range of 8-22 years onto the ABCD participants at baseline (9 to 10 years old) and year-two follow-up (11 to 12 years old) indicate that pre-trained models could capture the overall mean age failed precisely estimating brain age variation within a narrow range. The refined model, which combined broad prediction of the pre-trained model and granular information with the narrow age range, achieved the best performance with a mean absolute error of 0.49 and 0.48 years on the baseline and year-two data, respectively. The brain age gap yielded by the refined model showed significant associations with the participants’ information processing speed and verbal comprehension ability on baseline data. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10462059/ /pubmed/37645839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.16.553472 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. |
spellingShingle | Article Ray, Bhaskar Chen, Jiayu Fu, Zening Suresh, Pranav Thapaliya, Bishal Farahdel, Britny Calhoun, Vince D. Liu, Jingyu Replication and Refinement of Brain Age Model for adolescent development |
title | Replication and Refinement of Brain Age Model for adolescent development |
title_full | Replication and Refinement of Brain Age Model for adolescent development |
title_fullStr | Replication and Refinement of Brain Age Model for adolescent development |
title_full_unstemmed | Replication and Refinement of Brain Age Model for adolescent development |
title_short | Replication and Refinement of Brain Age Model for adolescent development |
title_sort | replication and refinement of brain age model for adolescent development |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.16.553472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raybhaskar replicationandrefinementofbrainagemodelforadolescentdevelopment AT chenjiayu replicationandrefinementofbrainagemodelforadolescentdevelopment AT fuzening replicationandrefinementofbrainagemodelforadolescentdevelopment AT sureshpranav replicationandrefinementofbrainagemodelforadolescentdevelopment AT thapaliyabishal replicationandrefinementofbrainagemodelforadolescentdevelopment AT farahdelbritny replicationandrefinementofbrainagemodelforadolescentdevelopment AT calhounvinced replicationandrefinementofbrainagemodelforadolescentdevelopment AT liujingyu replicationandrefinementofbrainagemodelforadolescentdevelopment |