Cargando…

Improved test-retest reliability of R(2)* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI) for improving the reliability of T(2)*-weighted (T(2)*w) data and quantification of R(2)* decay rate and susceptibility (χ) compared to conventional gradient echo (GRE)-based acquisition. Eight healthy subjects in a wide age...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yujia, Chen, Lin, Li, Xu, Liu, Jiaen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cornell University 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645047
_version_ 1785098002984075264
author Huang, Yujia
Chen, Lin
Li, Xu
Liu, Jiaen
author_facet Huang, Yujia
Chen, Lin
Li, Xu
Liu, Jiaen
author_sort Huang, Yujia
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the potential of 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI) for improving the reliability of T(2)*-weighted (T(2)*w) data and quantification of R(2)* decay rate and susceptibility (χ) compared to conventional gradient echo (GRE)-based acquisition. Eight healthy subjects in a wide age range were recruited. Each subject received repeated scans for both GRE and EPI acquisitions with an isotropic 1 mm resolution at 3 T. Maps of R(2)* and χ were quantified and compared using their inter-scan difference to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Inter-protocol differences of R(2)* and χ between GRE and EPI were also measured voxel by voxel and in selected ROIs to test the consistency between the two acquisition methods. The quantifications of R(2)* and χ using EPI protocols showed increased test-retest reliability with higher EPI factors up to 5 as performed in the experiment and were consistent with those based on GRE. This result suggested multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI can be a useful alternative acquisition method for T(2)*w MRI and quantification of R(2)* and χ with reduced scan time, improved test-retest reliability and similar accuracy compared to commonly used 3D GRE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cornell University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104621772023-08-29 Improved test-retest reliability of R(2)* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI Huang, Yujia Chen, Lin Li, Xu Liu, Jiaen ArXiv Article This study aimed to evaluate the potential of 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI) for improving the reliability of T(2)*-weighted (T(2)*w) data and quantification of R(2)* decay rate and susceptibility (χ) compared to conventional gradient echo (GRE)-based acquisition. Eight healthy subjects in a wide age range were recruited. Each subject received repeated scans for both GRE and EPI acquisitions with an isotropic 1 mm resolution at 3 T. Maps of R(2)* and χ were quantified and compared using their inter-scan difference to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Inter-protocol differences of R(2)* and χ between GRE and EPI were also measured voxel by voxel and in selected ROIs to test the consistency between the two acquisition methods. The quantifications of R(2)* and χ using EPI protocols showed increased test-retest reliability with higher EPI factors up to 5 as performed in the experiment and were consistent with those based on GRE. This result suggested multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI can be a useful alternative acquisition method for T(2)*w MRI and quantification of R(2)* and χ with reduced scan time, improved test-retest reliability and similar accuracy compared to commonly used 3D GRE. Cornell University 2023-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10462177/ /pubmed/37645047 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Yujia
Chen, Lin
Li, Xu
Liu, Jiaen
Improved test-retest reliability of R(2)* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI
title Improved test-retest reliability of R(2)* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI
title_full Improved test-retest reliability of R(2)* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI
title_fullStr Improved test-retest reliability of R(2)* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI
title_full_unstemmed Improved test-retest reliability of R(2)* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI
title_short Improved test-retest reliability of R(2)* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI
title_sort improved test-retest reliability of r(2)* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi-echo 3d epi
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645047
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyujia improvedtestretestreliabilityofr2andsusceptibilityquantificationusingmultishotmultiecho3depi
AT chenlin improvedtestretestreliabilityofr2andsusceptibilityquantificationusingmultishotmultiecho3depi
AT lixu improvedtestretestreliabilityofr2andsusceptibilityquantificationusingmultishotmultiecho3depi
AT liujiaen improvedtestretestreliabilityofr2andsusceptibilityquantificationusingmultishotmultiecho3depi