Cargando…

Resting state brain networks arise from electrophysiology-invisible signals

Resting-state brain networks (RSNs) have been widely applied in health and disease, but their interpretation in terms of the underlying neural activity is unclear. To systematically investigate this cornerstone issue, here we simultaneously recorded whole-brain resting-state functional magnetic reso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Nanyin, Tu, Wenyu, Cramer, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645880
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3251741/v1
_version_ 1785098005862416384
author Zhang, Nanyin
Tu, Wenyu
Cramer, Samuel
author_facet Zhang, Nanyin
Tu, Wenyu
Cramer, Samuel
author_sort Zhang, Nanyin
collection PubMed
description Resting-state brain networks (RSNs) have been widely applied in health and disease, but their interpretation in terms of the underlying neural activity is unclear. To systematically investigate this cornerstone issue, here we simultaneously recorded whole-brain resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and electrophysiology signals in two separate brain regions in rats. Our data show that for both recording sites, band-specific local field potential (LFP) power-derived spatial maps can explain up to 90% of spatial variance of RSNs obtained by the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal. Paradoxically, the time series of LFP band power can only explain up to 35% of temporal variance of the local BOLD time course from the same location even after controlling for the factors that may affect apparent LFP-BOLD correlations such as contrast-to-noise ratio. In addition, regressing out LFP band powers from the rsfMRI signal does not affect the spatial patterns of BOLD-derived RSNs, collectively suggesting that the electrophysiological activity has a marginal effect on the rsfMRI signal. These findings remain consistent in both light sedation and awake conditions. To reconcile this contradiction in the spatial and temporal relationships between resting-state electrophysiology and rsfMRI signals, we propose a model hypothesizing that the rsfMRI signal is driven by electrophysiology-invisible neural activities that are active in neurovascular coupling, but temporally weakly correlated to electrophysiology data. Meanwhile, signaling of electrophysiology and electrophysiology-invisible/BOLD activities are both constrained by the same anatomical backbone, leading to spatially similar RSNs. These data and the model provide a new perspective of our interpretation of RSNs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104621902023-08-29 Resting state brain networks arise from electrophysiology-invisible signals Zhang, Nanyin Tu, Wenyu Cramer, Samuel Res Sq Article Resting-state brain networks (RSNs) have been widely applied in health and disease, but their interpretation in terms of the underlying neural activity is unclear. To systematically investigate this cornerstone issue, here we simultaneously recorded whole-brain resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and electrophysiology signals in two separate brain regions in rats. Our data show that for both recording sites, band-specific local field potential (LFP) power-derived spatial maps can explain up to 90% of spatial variance of RSNs obtained by the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal. Paradoxically, the time series of LFP band power can only explain up to 35% of temporal variance of the local BOLD time course from the same location even after controlling for the factors that may affect apparent LFP-BOLD correlations such as contrast-to-noise ratio. In addition, regressing out LFP band powers from the rsfMRI signal does not affect the spatial patterns of BOLD-derived RSNs, collectively suggesting that the electrophysiological activity has a marginal effect on the rsfMRI signal. These findings remain consistent in both light sedation and awake conditions. To reconcile this contradiction in the spatial and temporal relationships between resting-state electrophysiology and rsfMRI signals, we propose a model hypothesizing that the rsfMRI signal is driven by electrophysiology-invisible neural activities that are active in neurovascular coupling, but temporally weakly correlated to electrophysiology data. Meanwhile, signaling of electrophysiology and electrophysiology-invisible/BOLD activities are both constrained by the same anatomical backbone, leading to spatially similar RSNs. These data and the model provide a new perspective of our interpretation of RSNs. American Journal Experts 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10462190/ /pubmed/37645880 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3251741/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Nanyin
Tu, Wenyu
Cramer, Samuel
Resting state brain networks arise from electrophysiology-invisible signals
title Resting state brain networks arise from electrophysiology-invisible signals
title_full Resting state brain networks arise from electrophysiology-invisible signals
title_fullStr Resting state brain networks arise from electrophysiology-invisible signals
title_full_unstemmed Resting state brain networks arise from electrophysiology-invisible signals
title_short Resting state brain networks arise from electrophysiology-invisible signals
title_sort resting state brain networks arise from electrophysiology-invisible signals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645880
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3251741/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangnanyin restingstatebrainnetworksarisefromelectrophysiologyinvisiblesignals
AT tuwenyu restingstatebrainnetworksarisefromelectrophysiologyinvisiblesignals
AT cramersamuel restingstatebrainnetworksarisefromelectrophysiologyinvisiblesignals