Cargando…

Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?

AIM: Financial incentives improve response to electronic health surveys, yet little is known about how unconditional incentives (guaranteed regardless of survey completion), conditional incentives, and various combinations of incentives influence response rates. We compared electronic health survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escudero, Jaclyn N., Tiro, Jasmin A., Buist, Diana S.M., Gao, Hongyuan, Beatty, Tara, Lin, John, Miglioretti, Diana L., Winer, Rachel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37641713
http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/chatmed.2023.002
_version_ 1785098023934623744
author Escudero, Jaclyn N.
Tiro, Jasmin A.
Buist, Diana S.M.
Gao, Hongyuan
Beatty, Tara
Lin, John
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Winer, Rachel L.
author_facet Escudero, Jaclyn N.
Tiro, Jasmin A.
Buist, Diana S.M.
Gao, Hongyuan
Beatty, Tara
Lin, John
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Winer, Rachel L.
author_sort Escudero, Jaclyn N.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Financial incentives improve response to electronic health surveys, yet little is known about how unconditional incentives (guaranteed regardless of survey completion), conditional incentives, and various combinations of incentives influence response rates. We compared electronic health survey completion with two different financial incentive structures. METHODS: We invited women aged 30-64 years enrolled in a U.S. healthcare system and overdue for Pap screening to complete a web-based survey after receiving a mailed human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kit in a pragmatic trial. HPV kit returners (n = 272) and non-returners (n = 1,083) were allocated to one of two different incentive structures: (1) Unconditional: $5 pre-incentive only (n = 653); (2) Combined: $2 pre-incentive plus $10 post-incentive conditional on completion (n = 702). Chi-square tests evaluated whether survey completion differed by incentive structure within kit return groups or was modified by kit return status. For each incentive-by-kit status group, the cost-per-survey response was calculated as: ([number invited*pre-incentive amount] + [number responses*post-incentive amount]) / number responses. RESULTS: Overall, survey response was higher in kit returners vs. kit non-returners (42.6% vs. 11.0%, P < 0.01), and survey response was higher in the combined (20.1%) vs. unconditional (14.4%) incentive group (P = 0.01). Kit return status did not modify the association between incentive type and survey response (P = 0.52). Among respondents, time to survey completion did not differ by incentive type among either kit returners or non-returners. Among returners, the cost-per-survey response was similar between groups ($13.57 unconditional; $14.15 combined); among non-returners, the cost was greater in the unconditional ($57.78) versus the combined ($25.22) group. CONCLUSION: A combined incentive can be cost-effective for increasing survey response in health services research, particularly in hard-to-reach populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104624062023-08-28 Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter? Escudero, Jaclyn N. Tiro, Jasmin A. Buist, Diana S.M. Gao, Hongyuan Beatty, Tara Lin, John Miglioretti, Diana L. Winer, Rachel L. Connect Health Telemed Article AIM: Financial incentives improve response to electronic health surveys, yet little is known about how unconditional incentives (guaranteed regardless of survey completion), conditional incentives, and various combinations of incentives influence response rates. We compared electronic health survey completion with two different financial incentive structures. METHODS: We invited women aged 30-64 years enrolled in a U.S. healthcare system and overdue for Pap screening to complete a web-based survey after receiving a mailed human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kit in a pragmatic trial. HPV kit returners (n = 272) and non-returners (n = 1,083) were allocated to one of two different incentive structures: (1) Unconditional: $5 pre-incentive only (n = 653); (2) Combined: $2 pre-incentive plus $10 post-incentive conditional on completion (n = 702). Chi-square tests evaluated whether survey completion differed by incentive structure within kit return groups or was modified by kit return status. For each incentive-by-kit status group, the cost-per-survey response was calculated as: ([number invited*pre-incentive amount] + [number responses*post-incentive amount]) / number responses. RESULTS: Overall, survey response was higher in kit returners vs. kit non-returners (42.6% vs. 11.0%, P < 0.01), and survey response was higher in the combined (20.1%) vs. unconditional (14.4%) incentive group (P = 0.01). Kit return status did not modify the association between incentive type and survey response (P = 0.52). Among respondents, time to survey completion did not differ by incentive type among either kit returners or non-returners. Among returners, the cost-per-survey response was similar between groups ($13.57 unconditional; $14.15 combined); among non-returners, the cost was greater in the unconditional ($57.78) versus the combined ($25.22) group. CONCLUSION: A combined incentive can be cost-effective for increasing survey response in health services research, particularly in hard-to-reach populations. 2023 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10462406/ /pubmed/37641713 http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/chatmed.2023.002 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Escudero, Jaclyn N.
Tiro, Jasmin A.
Buist, Diana S.M.
Gao, Hongyuan
Beatty, Tara
Lin, John
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Winer, Rachel L.
Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?
title Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?
title_full Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?
title_fullStr Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?
title_short Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?
title_sort impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37641713
http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/chatmed.2023.002
work_keys_str_mv AT escuderojaclynn impactofdifferentfinancialincentivestructuresonawebbasedhealthsurveydotimingandamountmatter
AT tirojasmina impactofdifferentfinancialincentivestructuresonawebbasedhealthsurveydotimingandamountmatter
AT buistdianasm impactofdifferentfinancialincentivestructuresonawebbasedhealthsurveydotimingandamountmatter
AT gaohongyuan impactofdifferentfinancialincentivestructuresonawebbasedhealthsurveydotimingandamountmatter
AT beattytara impactofdifferentfinancialincentivestructuresonawebbasedhealthsurveydotimingandamountmatter
AT linjohn impactofdifferentfinancialincentivestructuresonawebbasedhealthsurveydotimingandamountmatter
AT migliorettidianal impactofdifferentfinancialincentivestructuresonawebbasedhealthsurveydotimingandamountmatter
AT winerrachell impactofdifferentfinancialincentivestructuresonawebbasedhealthsurveydotimingandamountmatter