Cargando…

Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies

BACKGROUND: Technological advancements in the operating room (OR) have sparked new challenges for surgical workflow, OR professionals, and patient safety. Disruptive events are frequent across all surgical specialties, but little is known about their effects on patient outcomes and the influence of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koch, Amelie, Quartucci, Caroline, Buchner, Alexander, Schlenker, Boris, Becker, Armin, Catchpole, Ken, Weigl, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10162-2
_version_ 1785098045200793600
author Koch, Amelie
Quartucci, Caroline
Buchner, Alexander
Schlenker, Boris
Becker, Armin
Catchpole, Ken
Weigl, Matthias
author_facet Koch, Amelie
Quartucci, Caroline
Buchner, Alexander
Schlenker, Boris
Becker, Armin
Catchpole, Ken
Weigl, Matthias
author_sort Koch, Amelie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technological advancements in the operating room (OR) have sparked new challenges for surgical workflow, OR professionals, and patient safety. Disruptive events are frequent across all surgical specialties, but little is known about their effects on patient outcomes and the influence of systemic factors. The aim was to explore the associations of intraoperative flow disruptions (FDs) with patient outcomes, staff workload, and surgery duration. METHODS: Prospective, single-center, and multi-source study comprising direct and standardized OR observations of urologic surgical procedures, clinical patient outcomes, and staff- and patient-reported outcome data (PROMs; 3-month follow-up). All data were recorded between 01/2020 and 10/2021. FDs were assessed using standardized procedure observations. Linear and logistic regression analyses including multiple system factors were used to explore the effects of FDs on surgical outcomes. RESULTS: 61 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy procedures were captured (with 61 patients and 243 staff reports). High rates of FDs were observed; however, our analyses did not show significant relationships with patient complication rates. Equipment- and patient-related FDs were associated with increased staff workload. No association was found between higher rates of FDs and procedure duration. CONCLUSIONS: FDs were not related to inferior patient outcomes. Our findings may inform future OR investigations that scrutinize the complex interplay of human, team, process, and technological components that mitigate the effects of FDs during surgery. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10162-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104624992023-08-30 Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies Koch, Amelie Quartucci, Caroline Buchner, Alexander Schlenker, Boris Becker, Armin Catchpole, Ken Weigl, Matthias Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Technological advancements in the operating room (OR) have sparked new challenges for surgical workflow, OR professionals, and patient safety. Disruptive events are frequent across all surgical specialties, but little is known about their effects on patient outcomes and the influence of systemic factors. The aim was to explore the associations of intraoperative flow disruptions (FDs) with patient outcomes, staff workload, and surgery duration. METHODS: Prospective, single-center, and multi-source study comprising direct and standardized OR observations of urologic surgical procedures, clinical patient outcomes, and staff- and patient-reported outcome data (PROMs; 3-month follow-up). All data were recorded between 01/2020 and 10/2021. FDs were assessed using standardized procedure observations. Linear and logistic regression analyses including multiple system factors were used to explore the effects of FDs on surgical outcomes. RESULTS: 61 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy procedures were captured (with 61 patients and 243 staff reports). High rates of FDs were observed; however, our analyses did not show significant relationships with patient complication rates. Equipment- and patient-related FDs were associated with increased staff workload. No association was found between higher rates of FDs and procedure duration. CONCLUSIONS: FDs were not related to inferior patient outcomes. Our findings may inform future OR investigations that scrutinize the complex interplay of human, team, process, and technological components that mitigate the effects of FDs during surgery. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10162-2. Springer US 2023-06-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10462499/ /pubmed/37336845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10162-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Koch, Amelie
Quartucci, Caroline
Buchner, Alexander
Schlenker, Boris
Becker, Armin
Catchpole, Ken
Weigl, Matthias
Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies
title Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies
title_full Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies
title_fullStr Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies
title_full_unstemmed Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies
title_short Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies
title_sort associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10162-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kochamelie associationsofflowdisruptionswithpatientstaffandprocessoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyofroboticassistedradicalprostatectomies
AT quartuccicaroline associationsofflowdisruptionswithpatientstaffandprocessoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyofroboticassistedradicalprostatectomies
AT buchneralexander associationsofflowdisruptionswithpatientstaffandprocessoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyofroboticassistedradicalprostatectomies
AT schlenkerboris associationsofflowdisruptionswithpatientstaffandprocessoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyofroboticassistedradicalprostatectomies
AT beckerarmin associationsofflowdisruptionswithpatientstaffandprocessoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyofroboticassistedradicalprostatectomies
AT catchpoleken associationsofflowdisruptionswithpatientstaffandprocessoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyofroboticassistedradicalprostatectomies
AT weiglmatthias associationsofflowdisruptionswithpatientstaffandprocessoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyofroboticassistedradicalprostatectomies