Cargando…

A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research

BACKGROUND: A gap remains between the mounting evidence for single session management of bile duct stones and the adoption of this approach. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) is limited by the scarcity of training opportunities and adequate equipment and by the perception that the technique...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassar, Ahmad H. M., Sallam, Mahmoud, Khan, Khurram S., Kilpatrick, Rhona, Zino, Samer, Katbeh, Tarek Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10169-9
_version_ 1785098045450354688
author Nassar, Ahmad H. M.
Sallam, Mahmoud
Khan, Khurram S.
Kilpatrick, Rhona
Zino, Samer
Katbeh, Tarek Z.
author_facet Nassar, Ahmad H. M.
Sallam, Mahmoud
Khan, Khurram S.
Kilpatrick, Rhona
Zino, Samer
Katbeh, Tarek Z.
author_sort Nassar, Ahmad H. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A gap remains between the mounting evidence for single session management of bile duct stones and the adoption of this approach. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) is limited by the scarcity of training opportunities and adequate equipment and by the perception that the technique requires a high skill-set. The aim of this study was to create a new classification of difficulty based on operative characteristics and to stratify postoperative outcomes of easy vs. difficult LBDE irrespective of the surgeon’s experience. METHODS: A cohort of 1335 LBDEs was classified according to the location, number and size of ductal stones, the retrieval technique, utilisation of choledochoscopy and specific biliary pathologies encountered. A combination of features indicated easy (Grades I and II A & B) or difficult (Grades III A and B, IV and V) transcystic or transcholedochal explorations. RESULTS: 78.3% of patients with acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis, 37% with jaundice and 46% with cholangitis had easy explorations. Difficult explorations were more likely to present as emergencies, with obstructive jaundice, previous sphincterotomy and dilated bile ducts on ultrasound scans. 77.7% of easy explorations were transcystic and 62.3% of difficult explorations transductal. Choledochoscopy was utilised in 23.4% of easy vs. 98% of difficult explorations. The use of biliary drains, open conversions, median operative time, biliary-related complications, hospital stay, readmissions, and retained stones increased with the difficulty grade. Grades I and II patients had 2 or more hospital episodes in 26.5% vs. 41.2% for grades III to V. There were 2 deaths in difficulty Grade V and one in Grade IIB. CONCLUSION: Difficulty grading of LBDE is useful in predicting outcomes and facilitating comparison between studies. It ensures fair structuring and assessment of training and progress of the learning curve. LBDEs were easy in 72% with 77% completed transcystically. This may encourage more units to adopt this approach. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10169-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104625002023-08-30 A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research Nassar, Ahmad H. M. Sallam, Mahmoud Khan, Khurram S. Kilpatrick, Rhona Zino, Samer Katbeh, Tarek Z. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: A gap remains between the mounting evidence for single session management of bile duct stones and the adoption of this approach. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) is limited by the scarcity of training opportunities and adequate equipment and by the perception that the technique requires a high skill-set. The aim of this study was to create a new classification of difficulty based on operative characteristics and to stratify postoperative outcomes of easy vs. difficult LBDE irrespective of the surgeon’s experience. METHODS: A cohort of 1335 LBDEs was classified according to the location, number and size of ductal stones, the retrieval technique, utilisation of choledochoscopy and specific biliary pathologies encountered. A combination of features indicated easy (Grades I and II A & B) or difficult (Grades III A and B, IV and V) transcystic or transcholedochal explorations. RESULTS: 78.3% of patients with acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis, 37% with jaundice and 46% with cholangitis had easy explorations. Difficult explorations were more likely to present as emergencies, with obstructive jaundice, previous sphincterotomy and dilated bile ducts on ultrasound scans. 77.7% of easy explorations were transcystic and 62.3% of difficult explorations transductal. Choledochoscopy was utilised in 23.4% of easy vs. 98% of difficult explorations. The use of biliary drains, open conversions, median operative time, biliary-related complications, hospital stay, readmissions, and retained stones increased with the difficulty grade. Grades I and II patients had 2 or more hospital episodes in 26.5% vs. 41.2% for grades III to V. There were 2 deaths in difficulty Grade V and one in Grade IIB. CONCLUSION: Difficulty grading of LBDE is useful in predicting outcomes and facilitating comparison between studies. It ensures fair structuring and assessment of training and progress of the learning curve. LBDEs were easy in 72% with 77% completed transcystically. This may encourage more units to adopt this approach. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10169-9. Springer US 2023-06-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10462500/ /pubmed/37349591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10169-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Nassar, Ahmad H. M.
Sallam, Mahmoud
Khan, Khurram S.
Kilpatrick, Rhona
Zino, Samer
Katbeh, Tarek Z.
A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research
title A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research
title_full A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research
title_fullStr A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research
title_full_unstemmed A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research
title_short A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research
title_sort proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10169-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nassarahmadhm aproposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT sallammahmoud aproposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT khankhurrams aproposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT kilpatrickrhona aproposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT zinosamer aproposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT katbehtarekz aproposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT nassarahmadhm proposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT sallammahmoud proposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT khankhurrams proposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT kilpatrickrhona proposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT zinosamer proposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch
AT katbehtarekz proposeddifficultygradingsystemforlaparoscopicbileductexplorationbenefitstoclinicalpracticetrainingandresearch