Cargando…
Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions
BACKGROUND: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is vital in evaluating patients for surgery at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Previously, we reported manometry alters surgery choices at the GE junction over 50% of the time, and its components, i.e., abnormal motility and distal contractile integral...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10161-3 |
_version_ | 1785098057514221568 |
---|---|
author | Wiese, Georg Delgado, Carlos Inayat, Irteza Eubanks, Steve |
author_facet | Wiese, Georg Delgado, Carlos Inayat, Irteza Eubanks, Steve |
author_sort | Wiese, Georg |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is vital in evaluating patients for surgery at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Previously, we reported manometry alters surgery choices at the GE junction over 50% of the time, and its components, i.e., abnormal motility and distal contractile integral (DCI), are vital in decision-making. This single-institution retrospective study examines how HRM characteristics, reported with the Chicago classification, can alter the intended surgical plans for foregut surgery. METHODS: We collected data on pre-operative symptoms for patients undergoing HRM studies from 2012 to 2016, i.e., Upper GI X-rays, 48-h pH studies, DeMeester scores, upper endoscopy, and biopsy reports. HRM results were further categorized via Chicago classification (i.e., normal or abnormal motility). The DCI was determined; Patients not seen by a surgeon were excluded. Then a single surgeon, blinded to patient identity and HRM results, determined the planned procedure. The reviewer was then exposed to the HRM results; procedural plans were revised if needed. HRM results were then evaluated to determine which factors most influenced the surgical decisions. RESULTS: 298 HRM studies were initially identified; 114 met search criteria. Overall, HRM altered the planned procedure in 50.9% of cases (n = 58), with abnormal motility in 54.4% (62/114) cases. Abnormal motility findings corresponded to 70.6% (41/58) of the patients in which HRM changed the surgery decision. A DCI of < 1000 was identified in only 31.6% (36/114) of all patients, but 39.7% (23/58) of cases where the surgical decision was altered. A DCI of > 5000 was identified in only 10.5% (12/114) of all patients but 10.3% (6/58) of cases with altered surgical decisions. A DCI < 1000 and abnormal motility were generally associated with a partial fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the impact of identifying abnormal motility via the Chicago classification and factors like DCI on surgical choice at the GE junction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10462548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104625482023-08-30 Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions Wiese, Georg Delgado, Carlos Inayat, Irteza Eubanks, Steve Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is vital in evaluating patients for surgery at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Previously, we reported manometry alters surgery choices at the GE junction over 50% of the time, and its components, i.e., abnormal motility and distal contractile integral (DCI), are vital in decision-making. This single-institution retrospective study examines how HRM characteristics, reported with the Chicago classification, can alter the intended surgical plans for foregut surgery. METHODS: We collected data on pre-operative symptoms for patients undergoing HRM studies from 2012 to 2016, i.e., Upper GI X-rays, 48-h pH studies, DeMeester scores, upper endoscopy, and biopsy reports. HRM results were further categorized via Chicago classification (i.e., normal or abnormal motility). The DCI was determined; Patients not seen by a surgeon were excluded. Then a single surgeon, blinded to patient identity and HRM results, determined the planned procedure. The reviewer was then exposed to the HRM results; procedural plans were revised if needed. HRM results were then evaluated to determine which factors most influenced the surgical decisions. RESULTS: 298 HRM studies were initially identified; 114 met search criteria. Overall, HRM altered the planned procedure in 50.9% of cases (n = 58), with abnormal motility in 54.4% (62/114) cases. Abnormal motility findings corresponded to 70.6% (41/58) of the patients in which HRM changed the surgery decision. A DCI of < 1000 was identified in only 31.6% (36/114) of all patients, but 39.7% (23/58) of cases where the surgical decision was altered. A DCI of > 5000 was identified in only 10.5% (12/114) of all patients but 10.3% (6/58) of cases with altered surgical decisions. A DCI < 1000 and abnormal motility were generally associated with a partial fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the impact of identifying abnormal motility via the Chicago classification and factors like DCI on surgical choice at the GE junction. Springer US 2023-06-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10462548/ /pubmed/37365391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10161-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wiese, Georg Delgado, Carlos Inayat, Irteza Eubanks, Steve Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions |
title | Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions |
title_full | Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions |
title_fullStr | Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions |
title_full_unstemmed | Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions |
title_short | Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions |
title_sort | components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10161-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiesegeorg componentsofhighresolutionmanometrythatchangesurgicaldecisions AT delgadocarlos componentsofhighresolutionmanometrythatchangesurgicaldecisions AT inayatirteza componentsofhighresolutionmanometrythatchangesurgicaldecisions AT eubankssteve componentsofhighresolutionmanometrythatchangesurgicaldecisions |