Cargando…

Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions

BACKGROUND: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is vital in evaluating patients for surgery at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Previously, we reported manometry alters surgery choices at the GE junction over 50% of the time, and its components, i.e., abnormal motility and distal contractile integral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiese, Georg, Delgado, Carlos, Inayat, Irteza, Eubanks, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10161-3
_version_ 1785098057514221568
author Wiese, Georg
Delgado, Carlos
Inayat, Irteza
Eubanks, Steve
author_facet Wiese, Georg
Delgado, Carlos
Inayat, Irteza
Eubanks, Steve
author_sort Wiese, Georg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is vital in evaluating patients for surgery at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Previously, we reported manometry alters surgery choices at the GE junction over 50% of the time, and its components, i.e., abnormal motility and distal contractile integral (DCI), are vital in decision-making. This single-institution retrospective study examines how HRM characteristics, reported with the Chicago classification, can alter the intended surgical plans for foregut surgery. METHODS: We collected data on pre-operative symptoms for patients undergoing HRM studies from 2012 to 2016, i.e., Upper GI X-rays, 48-h pH studies, DeMeester scores, upper endoscopy, and biopsy reports. HRM results were further categorized via Chicago classification (i.e., normal or abnormal motility). The DCI was determined; Patients not seen by a surgeon were excluded. Then a single surgeon, blinded to patient identity and HRM results, determined the planned procedure. The reviewer was then exposed to the HRM results; procedural plans were revised if needed. HRM results were then evaluated to determine which factors most influenced the surgical decisions. RESULTS: 298 HRM studies were initially identified; 114 met search criteria. Overall, HRM altered the planned procedure in 50.9% of cases (n = 58), with abnormal motility in 54.4% (62/114) cases. Abnormal motility findings corresponded to 70.6% (41/58) of the patients in which HRM changed the surgery decision. A DCI of < 1000 was identified in only 31.6% (36/114) of all patients, but 39.7% (23/58) of cases where the surgical decision was altered. A DCI of > 5000 was identified in only 10.5% (12/114) of all patients but 10.3% (6/58) of cases with altered surgical decisions. A DCI < 1000 and abnormal motility were generally associated with a partial fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the impact of identifying abnormal motility via the Chicago classification and factors like DCI on surgical choice at the GE junction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104625482023-08-30 Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions Wiese, Georg Delgado, Carlos Inayat, Irteza Eubanks, Steve Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is vital in evaluating patients for surgery at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Previously, we reported manometry alters surgery choices at the GE junction over 50% of the time, and its components, i.e., abnormal motility and distal contractile integral (DCI), are vital in decision-making. This single-institution retrospective study examines how HRM characteristics, reported with the Chicago classification, can alter the intended surgical plans for foregut surgery. METHODS: We collected data on pre-operative symptoms for patients undergoing HRM studies from 2012 to 2016, i.e., Upper GI X-rays, 48-h pH studies, DeMeester scores, upper endoscopy, and biopsy reports. HRM results were further categorized via Chicago classification (i.e., normal or abnormal motility). The DCI was determined; Patients not seen by a surgeon were excluded. Then a single surgeon, blinded to patient identity and HRM results, determined the planned procedure. The reviewer was then exposed to the HRM results; procedural plans were revised if needed. HRM results were then evaluated to determine which factors most influenced the surgical decisions. RESULTS: 298 HRM studies were initially identified; 114 met search criteria. Overall, HRM altered the planned procedure in 50.9% of cases (n = 58), with abnormal motility in 54.4% (62/114) cases. Abnormal motility findings corresponded to 70.6% (41/58) of the patients in which HRM changed the surgery decision. A DCI of < 1000 was identified in only 31.6% (36/114) of all patients, but 39.7% (23/58) of cases where the surgical decision was altered. A DCI of > 5000 was identified in only 10.5% (12/114) of all patients but 10.3% (6/58) of cases with altered surgical decisions. A DCI < 1000 and abnormal motility were generally associated with a partial fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the impact of identifying abnormal motility via the Chicago classification and factors like DCI on surgical choice at the GE junction. Springer US 2023-06-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10462548/ /pubmed/37365391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10161-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wiese, Georg
Delgado, Carlos
Inayat, Irteza
Eubanks, Steve
Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions
title Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions
title_full Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions
title_fullStr Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions
title_full_unstemmed Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions
title_short Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions
title_sort components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10161-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wiesegeorg componentsofhighresolutionmanometrythatchangesurgicaldecisions
AT delgadocarlos componentsofhighresolutionmanometrythatchangesurgicaldecisions
AT inayatirteza componentsofhighresolutionmanometrythatchangesurgicaldecisions
AT eubankssteve componentsofhighresolutionmanometrythatchangesurgicaldecisions