Cargando…

Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Hand size, strength, and stature all impact a surgeon’s ability to perform Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery (TLS) comfortably and effectively. This is due to limitations in instrument and operating room design. This article aims to review performance, pain, and tool usability data base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hislop, Jaime, Orth, Dominic, Tirosh, Oren, Isaksson, Mats, Hensman, Chris, McCormick, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10228-1
_version_ 1785098059130077184
author Hislop, Jaime
Orth, Dominic
Tirosh, Oren
Isaksson, Mats
Hensman, Chris
McCormick, John
author_facet Hislop, Jaime
Orth, Dominic
Tirosh, Oren
Isaksson, Mats
Hensman, Chris
McCormick, John
author_sort Hislop, Jaime
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hand size, strength, and stature all impact a surgeon’s ability to perform Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery (TLS) comfortably and effectively. This is due to limitations in instrument and operating room design. This article aims to review performance, pain, and tool usability data based on biological sex and anthropometry. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched in May 2023. Retrieved articles were screened based on whether a full-text, English article was available in which original results were stratified by biological sex or physical proportions. Article quality was discussed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data were summarized in three main themes: task performance, physical discomfort, and tool usability and fit. Task completion times, pain prevalence, and grip style results between male and female surgeons formed three meta-analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1354 articles were sourced, and 54 were deemed suitable for inclusion. The collated results showed that female participants, predominantly novices, took 2.6–30.1 s longer to perform standardized laparoscopic tasks. Female surgeons reported pain at double the frequency of their male colleagues. Female surgeons and those with a smaller glove size were consistently more likely to report difficulty and require modified (potentially suboptimal) grip techniques with standard laparoscopic tools. CONCLUSIONS: The pain and stress reported by female or small-handed surgeons when using laparoscopic tools demonstrates the need for currently available instrument handles, including robotic hand controls, to become more size-inclusive. However, this study is limited by reporting bias and inconsistencies; furthermore, most data was collected in a simulated environment. Additional research into how anthropometric tool design impacts the live operating performance of experienced female surgeons would further inform this area of investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104625572023-08-30 Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis Hislop, Jaime Orth, Dominic Tirosh, Oren Isaksson, Mats Hensman, Chris McCormick, John Surg Endosc Review Article INTRODUCTION: Hand size, strength, and stature all impact a surgeon’s ability to perform Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery (TLS) comfortably and effectively. This is due to limitations in instrument and operating room design. This article aims to review performance, pain, and tool usability data based on biological sex and anthropometry. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched in May 2023. Retrieved articles were screened based on whether a full-text, English article was available in which original results were stratified by biological sex or physical proportions. Article quality was discussed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data were summarized in three main themes: task performance, physical discomfort, and tool usability and fit. Task completion times, pain prevalence, and grip style results between male and female surgeons formed three meta-analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1354 articles were sourced, and 54 were deemed suitable for inclusion. The collated results showed that female participants, predominantly novices, took 2.6–30.1 s longer to perform standardized laparoscopic tasks. Female surgeons reported pain at double the frequency of their male colleagues. Female surgeons and those with a smaller glove size were consistently more likely to report difficulty and require modified (potentially suboptimal) grip techniques with standard laparoscopic tools. CONCLUSIONS: The pain and stress reported by female or small-handed surgeons when using laparoscopic tools demonstrates the need for currently available instrument handles, including robotic hand controls, to become more size-inclusive. However, this study is limited by reporting bias and inconsistencies; furthermore, most data was collected in a simulated environment. Additional research into how anthropometric tool design impacts the live operating performance of experienced female surgeons would further inform this area of investigation. Springer US 2023-07-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10462557/ /pubmed/37433911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10228-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Hislop, Jaime
Orth, Dominic
Tirosh, Oren
Isaksson, Mats
Hensman, Chris
McCormick, John
Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10228-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hislopjaime doessurgeonsexandanthropometrymatterfortoolusabilityintraditionallaparoscopicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT orthdominic doessurgeonsexandanthropometrymatterfortoolusabilityintraditionallaparoscopicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tiroshoren doessurgeonsexandanthropometrymatterfortoolusabilityintraditionallaparoscopicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT isakssonmats doessurgeonsexandanthropometrymatterfortoolusabilityintraditionallaparoscopicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hensmanchris doessurgeonsexandanthropometrymatterfortoolusabilityintraditionallaparoscopicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mccormickjohn doessurgeonsexandanthropometrymatterfortoolusabilityintraditionallaparoscopicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis