Cargando…

Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study

There has been an increasing demand for robotic coil positioning during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment. Accurate coil positioning is crucial because rTMS generally targets specific brain regions for both research and clinical application with other reasons such as safe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Hyunsoo, Jeong, Hyeonseok, Ryu, Wooseok, Lee, Geunhu, Lee, Jaeho, Kim, Doyu, Song, In-Uk, Chung, Yong-An, Lee, Sungon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41044-1
_version_ 1785098067778732032
author Shin, Hyunsoo
Jeong, Hyeonseok
Ryu, Wooseok
Lee, Geunhu
Lee, Jaeho
Kim, Doyu
Song, In-Uk
Chung, Yong-An
Lee, Sungon
author_facet Shin, Hyunsoo
Jeong, Hyeonseok
Ryu, Wooseok
Lee, Geunhu
Lee, Jaeho
Kim, Doyu
Song, In-Uk
Chung, Yong-An
Lee, Sungon
author_sort Shin, Hyunsoo
collection PubMed
description There has been an increasing demand for robotic coil positioning during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment. Accurate coil positioning is crucial because rTMS generally targets specific brain regions for both research and clinical application with other reasons such as safety, consistency and reliability and individual variablity. Some previous studies have employed industrial robots or co-robots and showed they can more precisely stimulate the target cortical regions than traditional manual methods. In this study, we not only developed a custom-TMS robot for better TMS coil placement but also analyzed the therapeutic effects on depression. Treatment effects were evaluated by measuring regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) using single-photon emission computed tomography and depression severity before and after rTMS for the two positioning methods. The rTMS preparation time with our robotic coil placement was reduced by 53% compared with that of the manual method. The position and orientation errors were also significantly reduced from 11.17 mm and 4.06° to 0.94 mm and 0.11°, respectively, confirming the superiority of robotic positioning. The results from clinical and neuroimaging assessments indicated comparable improvements in depression severity and rCBF in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex between the robotic and manual rTMS groups. A questionnaire was used to determine the patients’ feelings about the robotic system, including the safety and preparation time. A high safety score indicated good acceptability of robotic rTMS at the clinical site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104626062023-08-30 Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study Shin, Hyunsoo Jeong, Hyeonseok Ryu, Wooseok Lee, Geunhu Lee, Jaeho Kim, Doyu Song, In-Uk Chung, Yong-An Lee, Sungon Sci Rep Article There has been an increasing demand for robotic coil positioning during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment. Accurate coil positioning is crucial because rTMS generally targets specific brain regions for both research and clinical application with other reasons such as safety, consistency and reliability and individual variablity. Some previous studies have employed industrial robots or co-robots and showed they can more precisely stimulate the target cortical regions than traditional manual methods. In this study, we not only developed a custom-TMS robot for better TMS coil placement but also analyzed the therapeutic effects on depression. Treatment effects were evaluated by measuring regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) using single-photon emission computed tomography and depression severity before and after rTMS for the two positioning methods. The rTMS preparation time with our robotic coil placement was reduced by 53% compared with that of the manual method. The position and orientation errors were also significantly reduced from 11.17 mm and 4.06° to 0.94 mm and 0.11°, respectively, confirming the superiority of robotic positioning. The results from clinical and neuroimaging assessments indicated comparable improvements in depression severity and rCBF in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex between the robotic and manual rTMS groups. A questionnaire was used to determine the patients’ feelings about the robotic system, including the safety and preparation time. A high safety score indicated good acceptability of robotic rTMS at the clinical site. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10462606/ /pubmed/37640754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41044-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Shin, Hyunsoo
Jeong, Hyeonseok
Ryu, Wooseok
Lee, Geunhu
Lee, Jaeho
Kim, Doyu
Song, In-Uk
Chung, Yong-An
Lee, Sungon
Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study
title Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study
title_full Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study
title_fullStr Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study
title_short Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study
title_sort robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41044-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shinhyunsoo robotictranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofdepressionapilotstudy
AT jeonghyeonseok robotictranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofdepressionapilotstudy
AT ryuwooseok robotictranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofdepressionapilotstudy
AT leegeunhu robotictranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofdepressionapilotstudy
AT leejaeho robotictranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofdepressionapilotstudy
AT kimdoyu robotictranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofdepressionapilotstudy
AT songinuk robotictranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofdepressionapilotstudy
AT chungyongan robotictranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofdepressionapilotstudy
AT leesungon robotictranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofdepressionapilotstudy