Cargando…
No waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department
BACKGROUND: Overcrowding in the emergency department (ED) is a global problem and a source of morbidity and mortality and exhaustion for the teams. Despite multiple strategies proposed to overcome overcrowding, the accumulation of patients lying in bed awaiting treatment or hospitalisation is often...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002431 |
_version_ | 1785098146936782848 |
---|---|
author | Schmutz, Thomas Le Terrier, Christophe Ribordy, Vincent Guechi, Youcef |
author_facet | Schmutz, Thomas Le Terrier, Christophe Ribordy, Vincent Guechi, Youcef |
author_sort | Schmutz, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Overcrowding in the emergency department (ED) is a global problem and a source of morbidity and mortality and exhaustion for the teams. Despite multiple strategies proposed to overcome overcrowding, the accumulation of patients lying in bed awaiting treatment or hospitalisation is often inevitable and a major obstacle to quality of care. We initiated a quality improvement project with the objective of zero patients lying in bed awaiting care/referral outside a care area. METHODS: Several plan–do–study–act (PDSA) cycles were tested and implemented to achieve and especially maintain the goal of having zero patients waiting for care outside the ED care area. The project team introduced and adapted five rules during these cycles: (1) no patients lying down outside of a care unit; (2) forward movement; (3) examination room always available; (4) team huddle and (5) an organisation overcrowding plan. RESULTS: Adaptation of ED organisation in the form of PDSA cycles allowed to obtain a collective team dimension to patient flow management. Since December 2021, despite an increase in activity, no patient is placed in a lying-in waiting area outside a care zone, irrespective of their care level. Vital distress and fragile patients who need to be kept in a supine position are treated immediately. In 2022, waiting time before medical contact was <2 hours for 90% of all patients combined. CONCLUSIONS: The PDSA strategy based on these five measures allowed to remove in-house obstacles to the internal flow of patients and to fight against their installation outside the care area. These measures are easily replicable by other management teams. Quality indicators of EDs are often heterogeneous, but we propose that the absence of patients lying on a stretcher outside a care area could be part of these indicators, and thus contribute to the improvement and safety of care provided to all patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10462955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104629552023-08-30 No waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department Schmutz, Thomas Le Terrier, Christophe Ribordy, Vincent Guechi, Youcef BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report BACKGROUND: Overcrowding in the emergency department (ED) is a global problem and a source of morbidity and mortality and exhaustion for the teams. Despite multiple strategies proposed to overcome overcrowding, the accumulation of patients lying in bed awaiting treatment or hospitalisation is often inevitable and a major obstacle to quality of care. We initiated a quality improvement project with the objective of zero patients lying in bed awaiting care/referral outside a care area. METHODS: Several plan–do–study–act (PDSA) cycles were tested and implemented to achieve and especially maintain the goal of having zero patients waiting for care outside the ED care area. The project team introduced and adapted five rules during these cycles: (1) no patients lying down outside of a care unit; (2) forward movement; (3) examination room always available; (4) team huddle and (5) an organisation overcrowding plan. RESULTS: Adaptation of ED organisation in the form of PDSA cycles allowed to obtain a collective team dimension to patient flow management. Since December 2021, despite an increase in activity, no patient is placed in a lying-in waiting area outside a care zone, irrespective of their care level. Vital distress and fragile patients who need to be kept in a supine position are treated immediately. In 2022, waiting time before medical contact was <2 hours for 90% of all patients combined. CONCLUSIONS: The PDSA strategy based on these five measures allowed to remove in-house obstacles to the internal flow of patients and to fight against their installation outside the care area. These measures are easily replicable by other management teams. Quality indicators of EDs are often heterogeneous, but we propose that the absence of patients lying on a stretcher outside a care area could be part of these indicators, and thus contribute to the improvement and safety of care provided to all patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10462955/ /pubmed/37640478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002431 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Schmutz, Thomas Le Terrier, Christophe Ribordy, Vincent Guechi, Youcef No waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department |
title | No waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department |
title_full | No waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department |
title_fullStr | No waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | No waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department |
title_short | No waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department |
title_sort | no waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmutzthomas nowaitinglyinginacorridoraqualityimprovementinitiativeinanemergencydepartment AT leterrierchristophe nowaitinglyinginacorridoraqualityimprovementinitiativeinanemergencydepartment AT ribordyvincent nowaitinglyinginacorridoraqualityimprovementinitiativeinanemergencydepartment AT guechiyoucef nowaitinglyinginacorridoraqualityimprovementinitiativeinanemergencydepartment |