Cargando…
Repurposed drug studies on the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Current evidence on the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis is inconclusive. We aimed to systematically evaluate published studies on repurposed drugs for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or COVID-19 among healthy adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. ELIGI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001674 |
_version_ | 1785098149426102272 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Guiling Verweij, Stefan Bijlsma, Maarten J de Vos, Stijn Oude Rengerink, Katrien Pasmooij, Anna Maria Gerdina van Baarle, Debbie Niesters, Hubert G M Mol, Peter Vonk, Judith M Hak, Eelko |
author_facet | Zhou, Guiling Verweij, Stefan Bijlsma, Maarten J de Vos, Stijn Oude Rengerink, Katrien Pasmooij, Anna Maria Gerdina van Baarle, Debbie Niesters, Hubert G M Mol, Peter Vonk, Judith M Hak, Eelko |
author_sort | Zhou, Guiling |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Current evidence on the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis is inconclusive. We aimed to systematically evaluate published studies on repurposed drugs for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or COVID-19 among healthy adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. ELIGIBILITY: Quantitative experimental and observational intervention studies that evaluated the effectiveness of repurposed drugs for the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or COVID-19 disease. DATA SOURCE: PubMed and Embase (1 January 2020–28 September 2022). RISK OF BIAS: Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions tools were applied to assess the quality of studies. DATA ANALYSIS: Meta-analyses for each eligible drug were performed if ≥2 similar study designs were available. RESULTS: In all, 65 (25 trials, 40 observational) and 29 publications were eligible for review and meta-analyses, respectively. Most studies pertained to hydroxychloroquine (32), ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) (11), statin (8), and ivermectin (8). In trials, hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis reduced laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (risk ratio: 0.82 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.90), I(2)=48%), a result largely driven by one clinical trial (weight: 60.5%). Such beneficial effects were not observed in observational studies, nor for prognostic clinical outcomes. Ivermectin did not significantly reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (RR: 0.35 (95% CI 0.10 to 1.26), I(2)=96%) and findings for clinical outcomes were inconsistent. Neither ACEi or ARB were beneficial in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most of the evidence from clinical trials was of moderate quality and of lower quality in observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our analysis are insufficient to support an evidence-based repurposed drug policy for SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis because of inconsistency. In the view of scarce supportive evidence on repurposing drugs for COVID-19, alternative strategies such as immunisation of vulnerable people are warranted to prevent the future waves of infection. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021292797. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10462970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104629702023-08-30 Repurposed drug studies on the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis Zhou, Guiling Verweij, Stefan Bijlsma, Maarten J de Vos, Stijn Oude Rengerink, Katrien Pasmooij, Anna Maria Gerdina van Baarle, Debbie Niesters, Hubert G M Mol, Peter Vonk, Judith M Hak, Eelko BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Infection OBJECTIVE: Current evidence on the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis is inconclusive. We aimed to systematically evaluate published studies on repurposed drugs for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or COVID-19 among healthy adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. ELIGIBILITY: Quantitative experimental and observational intervention studies that evaluated the effectiveness of repurposed drugs for the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or COVID-19 disease. DATA SOURCE: PubMed and Embase (1 January 2020–28 September 2022). RISK OF BIAS: Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions tools were applied to assess the quality of studies. DATA ANALYSIS: Meta-analyses for each eligible drug were performed if ≥2 similar study designs were available. RESULTS: In all, 65 (25 trials, 40 observational) and 29 publications were eligible for review and meta-analyses, respectively. Most studies pertained to hydroxychloroquine (32), ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) (11), statin (8), and ivermectin (8). In trials, hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis reduced laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (risk ratio: 0.82 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.90), I(2)=48%), a result largely driven by one clinical trial (weight: 60.5%). Such beneficial effects were not observed in observational studies, nor for prognostic clinical outcomes. Ivermectin did not significantly reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (RR: 0.35 (95% CI 0.10 to 1.26), I(2)=96%) and findings for clinical outcomes were inconsistent. Neither ACEi or ARB were beneficial in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most of the evidence from clinical trials was of moderate quality and of lower quality in observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our analysis are insufficient to support an evidence-based repurposed drug policy for SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis because of inconsistency. In the view of scarce supportive evidence on repurposing drugs for COVID-19, alternative strategies such as immunisation of vulnerable people are warranted to prevent the future waves of infection. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021292797. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10462970/ /pubmed/37640510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001674 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Respiratory Infection Zhou, Guiling Verweij, Stefan Bijlsma, Maarten J de Vos, Stijn Oude Rengerink, Katrien Pasmooij, Anna Maria Gerdina van Baarle, Debbie Niesters, Hubert G M Mol, Peter Vonk, Judith M Hak, Eelko Repurposed drug studies on the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Repurposed drug studies on the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Repurposed drug studies on the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Repurposed drug studies on the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Repurposed drug studies on the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Repurposed drug studies on the primary prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | repurposed drug studies on the primary prevention of sars-cov-2 infection during the pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Respiratory Infection |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001674 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouguiling repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT verweijstefan repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bijlsmamaartenj repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT devosstijn repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ouderengerinkkatrien repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pasmooijannamariagerdina repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanbaarledebbie repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT niestershubertgm repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT molpeter repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vonkjudithm repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hakeelko repurposeddrugstudiesontheprimarypreventionofsarscov2infectionduringthepandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |