Cargando…

Association between implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35%

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines support the use of implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with either non-ischaemic or ischaemic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. However, evidence from trials for effi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wasfy, Jason H, Achanta, Aditya, Hidrue, Michael K, Urbut, Sarah, Axtell, Andrea L, Berman, Adam N, Zhao, Yunong, Chen, Julian, Gustus, Sarah, Picard, Michael H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37625819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002289
_version_ 1785098150417006592
author Wasfy, Jason H
Achanta, Aditya
Hidrue, Michael K
Urbut, Sarah
Axtell, Andrea L
Berman, Adam N
Zhao, Yunong
Chen, Julian
Gustus, Sarah
Picard, Michael H
author_facet Wasfy, Jason H
Achanta, Aditya
Hidrue, Michael K
Urbut, Sarah
Axtell, Andrea L
Berman, Adam N
Zhao, Yunong
Chen, Julian
Gustus, Sarah
Picard, Michael H
author_sort Wasfy, Jason H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines support the use of implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with either non-ischaemic or ischaemic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. However, evidence from trials for efficacy specifically for patients with LVEF near 35% is weak. Past trials are underpowered for this population and future trials are unlikely to be performed. METHODS: Patients with lowest LVEF between 30% and 35% without an ICD prior to the lowest-LVEF echo (defined as ‘time zero’) were identified by querying echocardiography data from 28 November 2001 to 9 July 2020 at the Massachusetts General Hospital linked to ICD treatment status. To assess the association between ICD and mortality, propensity score matching followed by Cox proportional hazards models considering treatment status as a time-dependent covariate was used. A secondary analysis was performed for LVEF 36%–40%. RESULTS: Initially, 526 440 echocardiograms representing 266 601 unique patients were identified. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 6109 patients remained for the analytical cohort. In bivariate unadjusted comparisons, patients who received ICDs were substantially more often male (79.8% vs 65.4%, p<0.0001), more often white (87.5% vs 83.7%, p<0.046) and more often had a history of ventricular tachycardia (74.5% vs 19.1%, p<0.0001) and myocardial infarction (56.1% vs 38.2%, p<0.0001). In the propensity matched sample, after accounting for time-dependence, there was no association between ICD and mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.15, p=0.482). CONCLUSIONS: ICD therapy was not associated with reduced mortality near the conventional LVEF threshold of 35%. Although this treatment design cannot definitively demonstrate lack of efficacy, our results are concordant with available prior trial data. A definitive, well-powered trial is needed to answer the important clinical question of primary prevention ICD efficacy between LVEF 30% and 35%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104629742023-08-30 Association between implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35% Wasfy, Jason H Achanta, Aditya Hidrue, Michael K Urbut, Sarah Axtell, Andrea L Berman, Adam N Zhao, Yunong Chen, Julian Gustus, Sarah Picard, Michael H Open Heart Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines support the use of implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with either non-ischaemic or ischaemic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. However, evidence from trials for efficacy specifically for patients with LVEF near 35% is weak. Past trials are underpowered for this population and future trials are unlikely to be performed. METHODS: Patients with lowest LVEF between 30% and 35% without an ICD prior to the lowest-LVEF echo (defined as ‘time zero’) were identified by querying echocardiography data from 28 November 2001 to 9 July 2020 at the Massachusetts General Hospital linked to ICD treatment status. To assess the association between ICD and mortality, propensity score matching followed by Cox proportional hazards models considering treatment status as a time-dependent covariate was used. A secondary analysis was performed for LVEF 36%–40%. RESULTS: Initially, 526 440 echocardiograms representing 266 601 unique patients were identified. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 6109 patients remained for the analytical cohort. In bivariate unadjusted comparisons, patients who received ICDs were substantially more often male (79.8% vs 65.4%, p<0.0001), more often white (87.5% vs 83.7%, p<0.046) and more often had a history of ventricular tachycardia (74.5% vs 19.1%, p<0.0001) and myocardial infarction (56.1% vs 38.2%, p<0.0001). In the propensity matched sample, after accounting for time-dependence, there was no association between ICD and mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.15, p=0.482). CONCLUSIONS: ICD therapy was not associated with reduced mortality near the conventional LVEF threshold of 35%. Although this treatment design cannot definitively demonstrate lack of efficacy, our results are concordant with available prior trial data. A definitive, well-powered trial is needed to answer the important clinical question of primary prevention ICD efficacy between LVEF 30% and 35%. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10462974/ /pubmed/37625819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002289 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies
Wasfy, Jason H
Achanta, Aditya
Hidrue, Michael K
Urbut, Sarah
Axtell, Andrea L
Berman, Adam N
Zhao, Yunong
Chen, Julian
Gustus, Sarah
Picard, Michael H
Association between implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35%
title Association between implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35%
title_full Association between implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35%
title_fullStr Association between implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35%
title_full_unstemmed Association between implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35%
title_short Association between implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35%
title_sort association between implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35%
topic Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37625819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002289
work_keys_str_mv AT wasfyjasonh associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35
AT achantaaditya associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35
AT hidruemichaelk associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35
AT urbutsarah associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35
AT axtellandreal associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35
AT bermanadamn associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35
AT zhaoyunong associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35
AT chenjulian associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35
AT gustussarah associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35
AT picardmichaelh associationbetweenimplantedcardioverterdefibrillatorsandmortalityforpatientswithleftventricularejectionfractionbetween30and35