Cargando…

Texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists

BACKGROUND: Clinical texting systems (CTS) are widely used in hospitals for team communication about patients. With more institutions adopting such systems, there is a need to understand how texting is being used in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted content analysis of 809 randomly selected m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donnelly, Claire Elyse, Flores, Perla L, Weiner, Michael, Kara, Areeba Y, Lee, Joy L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002385
_version_ 1785098150666567680
author Donnelly, Claire Elyse
Flores, Perla L
Weiner, Michael
Kara, Areeba Y
Lee, Joy L
author_facet Donnelly, Claire Elyse
Flores, Perla L
Weiner, Michael
Kara, Areeba Y
Lee, Joy L
author_sort Donnelly, Claire Elyse
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical texting systems (CTS) are widely used in hospitals for team communication about patients. With more institutions adopting such systems, there is a need to understand how texting is being used in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted content analysis of 809 randomly selected message threads sent to and from hospitalists in a 9-month window. The process, purpose and content of messages were analysed. We also examined messages for personal content (to identify whether CTS was being used for professional matters) and discussion of near miss errors. The risk levels of these near misses were also assessed. RESULTS: Most messages focused on clinical management of patient needs (62%; n=498) and functioned to provide a notification or update regarding clinical care (64%; n=518) or make a request of the recipient (63%; n=510). Personal content was infrequent in message threads (10%; n=80). Five per cent (n=38) of message threads included discussion of a near miss, and most near misses posed low clinical risk overall (66%; n=25). CONCLUSION: Most CTS communication centred around direct clinical management. Fewer messages were focused on non-clinical areas such as administrative tasks or personal communication. Further examination of care delivery, error communication and the consequences of the care discussed in messages would help clinical leaders understand the impact of clinical texting on teamwork and quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10462975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104629752023-08-30 Texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists Donnelly, Claire Elyse Flores, Perla L Weiner, Michael Kara, Areeba Y Lee, Joy L BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Clinical texting systems (CTS) are widely used in hospitals for team communication about patients. With more institutions adopting such systems, there is a need to understand how texting is being used in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted content analysis of 809 randomly selected message threads sent to and from hospitalists in a 9-month window. The process, purpose and content of messages were analysed. We also examined messages for personal content (to identify whether CTS was being used for professional matters) and discussion of near miss errors. The risk levels of these near misses were also assessed. RESULTS: Most messages focused on clinical management of patient needs (62%; n=498) and functioned to provide a notification or update regarding clinical care (64%; n=518) or make a request of the recipient (63%; n=510). Personal content was infrequent in message threads (10%; n=80). Five per cent (n=38) of message threads included discussion of a near miss, and most near misses posed low clinical risk overall (66%; n=25). CONCLUSION: Most CTS communication centred around direct clinical management. Fewer messages were focused on non-clinical areas such as administrative tasks or personal communication. Further examination of care delivery, error communication and the consequences of the care discussed in messages would help clinical leaders understand the impact of clinical texting on teamwork and quality of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10462975/ /pubmed/37640477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002385 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Donnelly, Claire Elyse
Flores, Perla L
Weiner, Michael
Kara, Areeba Y
Lee, Joy L
Texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists
title Texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists
title_full Texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists
title_fullStr Texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists
title_full_unstemmed Texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists
title_short Texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists
title_sort texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002385
work_keys_str_mv AT donnellyclaireelyse textingiscaringacontentanalysisofclinicaltextmessagesbyhospitalists
AT floresperlal textingiscaringacontentanalysisofclinicaltextmessagesbyhospitalists
AT weinermichael textingiscaringacontentanalysisofclinicaltextmessagesbyhospitalists
AT karaareebay textingiscaringacontentanalysisofclinicaltextmessagesbyhospitalists
AT leejoyl textingiscaringacontentanalysisofclinicaltextmessagesbyhospitalists