Cargando…

Robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Robots are being used in a wide range of surgical procedures. However, in clinical practice, the efficacy of orthopedic robotic-assisted treatment of femoral neck fractures is still poorly reported, particularly in terms of screw placement accuracy, femoral neck fracture healing rates an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiaofei, Zhang, Yaxin, Lou, Linbing, Xu, Lei, Fei, Wenyong, Dai, Jihang, Wang, Jingcheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37641097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04070-3
_version_ 1785098196561690624
author Wang, Xiaofei
Zhang, Yaxin
Lou, Linbing
Xu, Lei
Fei, Wenyong
Dai, Jihang
Wang, Jingcheng
author_facet Wang, Xiaofei
Zhang, Yaxin
Lou, Linbing
Xu, Lei
Fei, Wenyong
Dai, Jihang
Wang, Jingcheng
author_sort Wang, Xiaofei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robots are being used in a wide range of surgical procedures. However, in clinical practice, the efficacy of orthopedic robotic-assisted treatment of femoral neck fractures is still poorly reported, particularly in terms of screw placement accuracy, femoral neck fracture healing rates and postoperative functional recovery. Moreover, there is a lack of comparative analysis between robot-assisted surgery and traditional surgical approaches. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with femoral neck fractures treated with TiRobot-assisted hollow screw fixation with those of patients with femoral neck fractures treated with traditional surgical approaches. METHODS: This study included 112 patients with femoral neck fracture who were treated from March 2017 to October 2021 with percutaneous hollow screw internal fixation. These included 56 cases in the TiRobot-assisted surgery group and 56 cases in the standard surgery group. After at least 1 year of follow-up, the treatment outcomes of the two groups were compared, including the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the number of guide pin positioning adjustments, the length of hospital stay, the accuracy rate of screw placement, the final Harris Hip Score, the fracture healing rate, and the rate of femoral head necrosis. Statistical analysis software was used to process and analyze the result. RESULTS: The TiRobot-assisted group had a statistically significant improvement over the control group in terms of intraoperative bleeding, the duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the number of guide pin positioning adjustments, length of hospital stay, accuracy of screw placement and incidence of femoral head necrosis (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in time to surgery, final Harris hip score and fracture healing rate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that TiRobot-assisted surgery has the advantages of short hospital stay, high safety, minimally invasive, high success rate of nail placement, and can reduce the amount of intraoperative radiation and the incidence of femoral head necrosis, thus achieving satisfactory clinical outcomes, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10463292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104632922023-08-30 Robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study Wang, Xiaofei Zhang, Yaxin Lou, Linbing Xu, Lei Fei, Wenyong Dai, Jihang Wang, Jingcheng J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Robots are being used in a wide range of surgical procedures. However, in clinical practice, the efficacy of orthopedic robotic-assisted treatment of femoral neck fractures is still poorly reported, particularly in terms of screw placement accuracy, femoral neck fracture healing rates and postoperative functional recovery. Moreover, there is a lack of comparative analysis between robot-assisted surgery and traditional surgical approaches. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with femoral neck fractures treated with TiRobot-assisted hollow screw fixation with those of patients with femoral neck fractures treated with traditional surgical approaches. METHODS: This study included 112 patients with femoral neck fracture who were treated from March 2017 to October 2021 with percutaneous hollow screw internal fixation. These included 56 cases in the TiRobot-assisted surgery group and 56 cases in the standard surgery group. After at least 1 year of follow-up, the treatment outcomes of the two groups were compared, including the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the number of guide pin positioning adjustments, the length of hospital stay, the accuracy rate of screw placement, the final Harris Hip Score, the fracture healing rate, and the rate of femoral head necrosis. Statistical analysis software was used to process and analyze the result. RESULTS: The TiRobot-assisted group had a statistically significant improvement over the control group in terms of intraoperative bleeding, the duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the number of guide pin positioning adjustments, length of hospital stay, accuracy of screw placement and incidence of femoral head necrosis (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in time to surgery, final Harris hip score and fracture healing rate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that TiRobot-assisted surgery has the advantages of short hospital stay, high safety, minimally invasive, high success rate of nail placement, and can reduce the amount of intraoperative radiation and the incidence of femoral head necrosis, thus achieving satisfactory clinical outcomes, and is worthy of clinical promotion. BioMed Central 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10463292/ /pubmed/37641097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04070-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Xiaofei
Zhang, Yaxin
Lou, Linbing
Xu, Lei
Fei, Wenyong
Dai, Jihang
Wang, Jingcheng
Robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study
title Robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study
title_full Robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study
title_short Robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study
title_sort robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37641097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04070-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiaofei roboticassistedsystemsforthesafeandreliabletreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangyaxin roboticassistedsystemsforthesafeandreliabletreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesretrospectivecohortstudy
AT loulinbing roboticassistedsystemsforthesafeandreliabletreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xulei roboticassistedsystemsforthesafeandreliabletreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesretrospectivecohortstudy
AT feiwenyong roboticassistedsystemsforthesafeandreliabletreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesretrospectivecohortstudy
AT daijihang roboticassistedsystemsforthesafeandreliabletreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wangjingcheng roboticassistedsystemsforthesafeandreliabletreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesretrospectivecohortstudy