Cargando…
Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda
BACKGROUND: The UK’s post-Brexit trade strategy has potentially important implications for population health and equity. In particular, it will impact on the structural risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including the consumption of health-harming commodities such as tobacco, alcohol...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00956-3 |
_version_ | 1785098223297232896 |
---|---|
author | Hawkins, Benjamin Barlow, Pepita van Schalkwyk, May CI Holden, Chris |
author_facet | Hawkins, Benjamin Barlow, Pepita van Schalkwyk, May CI Holden, Chris |
author_sort | Hawkins, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The UK’s post-Brexit trade strategy has potentially important implications for population health and equity. In particular, it will impact on the structural risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including the consumption of health-harming commodities such as tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food and beverages. This article catalogues recent developments in UK trade policy. It then presents a narrative review of the existing research literature on trade and health and previous, prospective studies on the health impacts of Brexit. In so doing it identifies key questions and foci for a future research agenda on the implications of UK’s emerging trade regime for NCD prevention. MAIN TEXT: We identify five key areas for future research. (1) Additional scholarship to document the health effects of key trade agreements negotiated by the UK government; (2) The implications of these agreements for policy-making to address health impacts, including the potential for legal challenges under dispute settlement mechanisms; (3) The strategic objectives being pursued by the UK government and the extent to which they support or undermine public health; (4) The process of trade policy-making, its openness to public health interests and actors and the impact of the political and ideological legacy of Brexit on outcomes; (5) The impact of the UK’s post-Brexit trade policy on partner countries and blocs and their cumulative impact on the global trade regime. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is urgently need to understand the ways in which the UK’s post-Brexit trade strategy will impact on NCDs and policy responses to address these, including the openness of the trade policy architecture to health issues. The outcomes of this process will have wider systemic effects on the global trade regime with implications for health. Researchers must be cognizant of the ideological components of the policy debate which have been absent from previous analysis of Brexit, trade and health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10463402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104634022023-08-30 Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda Hawkins, Benjamin Barlow, Pepita van Schalkwyk, May CI Holden, Chris Global Health Review BACKGROUND: The UK’s post-Brexit trade strategy has potentially important implications for population health and equity. In particular, it will impact on the structural risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including the consumption of health-harming commodities such as tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food and beverages. This article catalogues recent developments in UK trade policy. It then presents a narrative review of the existing research literature on trade and health and previous, prospective studies on the health impacts of Brexit. In so doing it identifies key questions and foci for a future research agenda on the implications of UK’s emerging trade regime for NCD prevention. MAIN TEXT: We identify five key areas for future research. (1) Additional scholarship to document the health effects of key trade agreements negotiated by the UK government; (2) The implications of these agreements for policy-making to address health impacts, including the potential for legal challenges under dispute settlement mechanisms; (3) The strategic objectives being pursued by the UK government and the extent to which they support or undermine public health; (4) The process of trade policy-making, its openness to public health interests and actors and the impact of the political and ideological legacy of Brexit on outcomes; (5) The impact of the UK’s post-Brexit trade policy on partner countries and blocs and their cumulative impact on the global trade regime. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is urgently need to understand the ways in which the UK’s post-Brexit trade strategy will impact on NCDs and policy responses to address these, including the openness of the trade policy architecture to health issues. The outcomes of this process will have wider systemic effects on the global trade regime with implications for health. Researchers must be cognizant of the ideological components of the policy debate which have been absent from previous analysis of Brexit, trade and health. BioMed Central 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10463402/ /pubmed/37612704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00956-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Hawkins, Benjamin Barlow, Pepita van Schalkwyk, May CI Holden, Chris Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda |
title | Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda |
title_full | Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda |
title_fullStr | Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda |
title_full_unstemmed | Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda |
title_short | Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda |
title_sort | brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00956-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hawkinsbenjamin brexittradeandthegovernanceofnoncommunicablediseasesaresearchagenda AT barlowpepita brexittradeandthegovernanceofnoncommunicablediseasesaresearchagenda AT vanschalkwykmayci brexittradeandthegovernanceofnoncommunicablediseasesaresearchagenda AT holdenchris brexittradeandthegovernanceofnoncommunicablediseasesaresearchagenda |