Cargando…

A biomechanical comparison of three fixation methods for unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defect

BACKGROUND: Unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defects are difficult to manage. The optimal fixation methods for these fractures have been a subject of ongoing debate among orthopedic surgeons. In this study, three different fixation techniques for vertical, medial defected femoral n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koraman, Emre, Iyetin, Yusuf, Ozyaman, Oguzhan, Akyurek, Muhlik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04100-0
_version_ 1785098233391874048
author Koraman, Emre
Iyetin, Yusuf
Ozyaman, Oguzhan
Akyurek, Muhlik
author_facet Koraman, Emre
Iyetin, Yusuf
Ozyaman, Oguzhan
Akyurek, Muhlik
author_sort Koraman, Emre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defects are difficult to manage. The optimal fixation methods for these fractures have been a subject of ongoing debate among orthopedic surgeons. In this study, three different fixation techniques for vertical, medial defected femoral neck fractures were compared. METHODS: In this study, a biomechanical analysis was conducted to compare three fixation methods: cannulated screws (Group 1), cannulated screws combined with a medial buttress plate (Group 2), and intramedullary nails (Group 3). Synthetic composite bone models representing vertical collum femoris fractures with medial calcar defects were used. Each group consisted of seven specimens, and, to maintain consistency, a single surgeon performed the surgical procedure. Biomechanical testing involved subjecting the specimens to axial loading until failure, and the load to failure, stiffness, and displacement values were recorded. Normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post hoc test were used for comparisons. RESULTS: The difference in the load to failure values was statistically significant among the groups, with Group 2 exhibiting the highest load to failure value, followed by Group 3 and Group 1. Stiffness values were significantly higher in Group 2 than in the other groups. Displacement values were not significantly different between the groups. Fracture and displacement patterns at the point of failure varied across the groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that fixation with a medial buttress plate in combination with cannulated screws provides additional biomechanical stability for vertical femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defects. Intramedullary nail fixation also demonstrated durable stability in these fractures. These findings can be used to better understand current management strategies for these challenging fractures to promote the identification of better evidence-based recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10463443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104634432023-08-30 A biomechanical comparison of three fixation methods for unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defect Koraman, Emre Iyetin, Yusuf Ozyaman, Oguzhan Akyurek, Muhlik J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defects are difficult to manage. The optimal fixation methods for these fractures have been a subject of ongoing debate among orthopedic surgeons. In this study, three different fixation techniques for vertical, medial defected femoral neck fractures were compared. METHODS: In this study, a biomechanical analysis was conducted to compare three fixation methods: cannulated screws (Group 1), cannulated screws combined with a medial buttress plate (Group 2), and intramedullary nails (Group 3). Synthetic composite bone models representing vertical collum femoris fractures with medial calcar defects were used. Each group consisted of seven specimens, and, to maintain consistency, a single surgeon performed the surgical procedure. Biomechanical testing involved subjecting the specimens to axial loading until failure, and the load to failure, stiffness, and displacement values were recorded. Normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post hoc test were used for comparisons. RESULTS: The difference in the load to failure values was statistically significant among the groups, with Group 2 exhibiting the highest load to failure value, followed by Group 3 and Group 1. Stiffness values were significantly higher in Group 2 than in the other groups. Displacement values were not significantly different between the groups. Fracture and displacement patterns at the point of failure varied across the groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that fixation with a medial buttress plate in combination with cannulated screws provides additional biomechanical stability for vertical femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defects. Intramedullary nail fixation also demonstrated durable stability in these fractures. These findings can be used to better understand current management strategies for these challenging fractures to promote the identification of better evidence-based recommendations. BioMed Central 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10463443/ /pubmed/37608280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04100-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koraman, Emre
Iyetin, Yusuf
Ozyaman, Oguzhan
Akyurek, Muhlik
A biomechanical comparison of three fixation methods for unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defect
title A biomechanical comparison of three fixation methods for unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defect
title_full A biomechanical comparison of three fixation methods for unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defect
title_fullStr A biomechanical comparison of three fixation methods for unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defect
title_full_unstemmed A biomechanical comparison of three fixation methods for unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defect
title_short A biomechanical comparison of three fixation methods for unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defect
title_sort biomechanical comparison of three fixation methods for unstable femoral neck fractures with medial calcar defect
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04100-0
work_keys_str_mv AT koramanemre abiomechanicalcomparisonofthreefixationmethodsforunstablefemoralneckfractureswithmedialcalcardefect
AT iyetinyusuf abiomechanicalcomparisonofthreefixationmethodsforunstablefemoralneckfractureswithmedialcalcardefect
AT ozyamanoguzhan abiomechanicalcomparisonofthreefixationmethodsforunstablefemoralneckfractureswithmedialcalcardefect
AT akyurekmuhlik abiomechanicalcomparisonofthreefixationmethodsforunstablefemoralneckfractureswithmedialcalcardefect
AT koramanemre biomechanicalcomparisonofthreefixationmethodsforunstablefemoralneckfractureswithmedialcalcardefect
AT iyetinyusuf biomechanicalcomparisonofthreefixationmethodsforunstablefemoralneckfractureswithmedialcalcardefect
AT ozyamanoguzhan biomechanicalcomparisonofthreefixationmethodsforunstablefemoralneckfractureswithmedialcalcardefect
AT akyurekmuhlik biomechanicalcomparisonofthreefixationmethodsforunstablefemoralneckfractureswithmedialcalcardefect