Cargando…

Assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial UKA: MRI vs. Valgus stress radiograph

BACKGROUND: The cartilage quality of the lateral compartment needs to be clarified prior to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Valgus stress radiograph has been recommended as the preferred tool. Some studies also show that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a higher diagnostic value...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiao, Xufeng, Cao, Guanglei, Wu, Jiangpeng, Li, Zheng, An, Shuai, Huang, Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37633881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06802-2
_version_ 1785098250911481856
author Jiao, Xufeng
Cao, Guanglei
Wu, Jiangpeng
Li, Zheng
An, Shuai
Huang, Jiang
author_facet Jiao, Xufeng
Cao, Guanglei
Wu, Jiangpeng
Li, Zheng
An, Shuai
Huang, Jiang
author_sort Jiao, Xufeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cartilage quality of the lateral compartment needs to be clarified prior to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Valgus stress radiograph has been recommended as the preferred tool. Some studies also show that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a higher diagnostic value. So, we conducted this study to compare whether valgus stress radiographic lateral joint space width (LJSW) and MRI grading can accurately reflect cartilage quality and its screening value for UKA-suitable patients. METHODS: One hundred and thirty eight knees proposed for UKA were enrolled prospectively. Valgus stress radiograph was taken to measure LJSW. LJSW > 4 mm was considered normal and suitable for UKA. For weight-bearing area cartilage of lateral femoral condyle, Recht grade was assessed by MRI preoperatively. Recht grades ≤ 2 were treated as non-high-grade injuries while Recht grades > 2 were treated as high-grade injuries. Outerbridge grade was the gold standard and was assessed intraoperatively. Patients with Outerbridge grades 0–2 (non-high-grade injuries) underwent UKA, and patients with Outerbridge grades 3–4 (high-grade injuries) underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The diagnostic parameters of valgus stress radiograph and MRI for the selection of UKA candidates were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 138 knees, 120 underwent UKAs, and 18 underwent TKAs. In terms of selecting UKA candidates, the sensitivity was close between MRI (95.0%) and valgus stress radiograph (96.7%), and the specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MRI (94.4%, 94.9%, 99.1%, 73.9%, respectively) were higher than that of valgus stress radiograph (5.9%, 85.5%, 88.0%, 20.0%, respectively). The difference in area under the curve (AUC) between MRI (0.950) and LJSW (0.602) was significant (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with valgus stress radiograph, MRI has excellent evaluation value in diagnosing lateral weight-bearing cartilage injuries and can be used as a reliable tool for selecting suitable UKA patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10463517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104635172023-08-30 Assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial UKA: MRI vs. Valgus stress radiograph Jiao, Xufeng Cao, Guanglei Wu, Jiangpeng Li, Zheng An, Shuai Huang, Jiang BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The cartilage quality of the lateral compartment needs to be clarified prior to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Valgus stress radiograph has been recommended as the preferred tool. Some studies also show that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a higher diagnostic value. So, we conducted this study to compare whether valgus stress radiographic lateral joint space width (LJSW) and MRI grading can accurately reflect cartilage quality and its screening value for UKA-suitable patients. METHODS: One hundred and thirty eight knees proposed for UKA were enrolled prospectively. Valgus stress radiograph was taken to measure LJSW. LJSW > 4 mm was considered normal and suitable for UKA. For weight-bearing area cartilage of lateral femoral condyle, Recht grade was assessed by MRI preoperatively. Recht grades ≤ 2 were treated as non-high-grade injuries while Recht grades > 2 were treated as high-grade injuries. Outerbridge grade was the gold standard and was assessed intraoperatively. Patients with Outerbridge grades 0–2 (non-high-grade injuries) underwent UKA, and patients with Outerbridge grades 3–4 (high-grade injuries) underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The diagnostic parameters of valgus stress radiograph and MRI for the selection of UKA candidates were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 138 knees, 120 underwent UKAs, and 18 underwent TKAs. In terms of selecting UKA candidates, the sensitivity was close between MRI (95.0%) and valgus stress radiograph (96.7%), and the specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MRI (94.4%, 94.9%, 99.1%, 73.9%, respectively) were higher than that of valgus stress radiograph (5.9%, 85.5%, 88.0%, 20.0%, respectively). The difference in area under the curve (AUC) between MRI (0.950) and LJSW (0.602) was significant (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with valgus stress radiograph, MRI has excellent evaluation value in diagnosing lateral weight-bearing cartilage injuries and can be used as a reliable tool for selecting suitable UKA patients. BioMed Central 2023-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10463517/ /pubmed/37633881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06802-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jiao, Xufeng
Cao, Guanglei
Wu, Jiangpeng
Li, Zheng
An, Shuai
Huang, Jiang
Assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial UKA: MRI vs. Valgus stress radiograph
title Assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial UKA: MRI vs. Valgus stress radiograph
title_full Assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial UKA: MRI vs. Valgus stress radiograph
title_fullStr Assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial UKA: MRI vs. Valgus stress radiograph
title_full_unstemmed Assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial UKA: MRI vs. Valgus stress radiograph
title_short Assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial UKA: MRI vs. Valgus stress radiograph
title_sort assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial uka: mri vs. valgus stress radiograph
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37633881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06802-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaoxufeng assessinglateralfemoralcondylecartilagepriortomedialukamrivsvalgusstressradiograph
AT caoguanglei assessinglateralfemoralcondylecartilagepriortomedialukamrivsvalgusstressradiograph
AT wujiangpeng assessinglateralfemoralcondylecartilagepriortomedialukamrivsvalgusstressradiograph
AT lizheng assessinglateralfemoralcondylecartilagepriortomedialukamrivsvalgusstressradiograph
AT anshuai assessinglateralfemoralcondylecartilagepriortomedialukamrivsvalgusstressradiograph
AT huangjiang assessinglateralfemoralcondylecartilagepriortomedialukamrivsvalgusstressradiograph