Cargando…
Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) may receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but current selection criteria are imprecise, and many patients have limited treatment response. Hemodynamic forces (HDF) have been suggested as a marker for CRT response....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37620886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00955-8 |
_version_ | 1785098251438915584 |
---|---|
author | Pola, Karin Roijer, Anders Borgquist, Rasmus Ostenfeld, Ellen Carlsson, Marcus Bakos, Zoltan Arheden, Håkan Arvidsson, Per M. |
author_facet | Pola, Karin Roijer, Anders Borgquist, Rasmus Ostenfeld, Ellen Carlsson, Marcus Bakos, Zoltan Arheden, Håkan Arvidsson, Per M. |
author_sort | Pola, Karin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) may receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but current selection criteria are imprecise, and many patients have limited treatment response. Hemodynamic forces (HDF) have been suggested as a marker for CRT response. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate left ventricular (LV) HDF as a predictive marker for LV remodeling after CRT. METHODS: Patients with heart failure, EF < 35% and LBBB (n = 22) underwent CMR with 4D flow prior to CRT. LV HDF were computed in three directions using the Navier–Stokes equations, reported in median N [interquartile range], and the ratio of transverse/longitudinal HDF was calculated for systole and diastole. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after CRT. Patients with end-systolic volume reduction ≥ 15% were defined as responders. RESULTS: Non-responders had smaller HDF than responders in the inferior-anterior direction in systole (0.06 [0.03] vs. 0.07 [0.03], p = 0.04), and in the apex-base direction in diastole (0.09 [0.02] vs. 0.1 [0.05], p = 0.047). Non-responders had larger diastolic HDF ratio compared to responders (0.89 vs. 0.67, p = 0.004). ROC analysis of diastolic HDF ratio for identifying CRT non-responders had AUC of 0.88 (p = 0.005) with sensitivity 57% and specificity 100% for ratio > 0.87. Intragroup comparison found higher HDF ratio in systole compared to diastole for responders (p = 0.003), but not for non-responders (p = 0.8). CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic force ratio is a potential marker for identifying patients with heart failure and LBBB who are unlikely to benefit from CRT. Larger-scale studies are required before implementation of HDF analysis into clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-023-00955-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10463519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104635192023-08-30 Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy Pola, Karin Roijer, Anders Borgquist, Rasmus Ostenfeld, Ellen Carlsson, Marcus Bakos, Zoltan Arheden, Håkan Arvidsson, Per M. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) may receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but current selection criteria are imprecise, and many patients have limited treatment response. Hemodynamic forces (HDF) have been suggested as a marker for CRT response. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate left ventricular (LV) HDF as a predictive marker for LV remodeling after CRT. METHODS: Patients with heart failure, EF < 35% and LBBB (n = 22) underwent CMR with 4D flow prior to CRT. LV HDF were computed in three directions using the Navier–Stokes equations, reported in median N [interquartile range], and the ratio of transverse/longitudinal HDF was calculated for systole and diastole. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after CRT. Patients with end-systolic volume reduction ≥ 15% were defined as responders. RESULTS: Non-responders had smaller HDF than responders in the inferior-anterior direction in systole (0.06 [0.03] vs. 0.07 [0.03], p = 0.04), and in the apex-base direction in diastole (0.09 [0.02] vs. 0.1 [0.05], p = 0.047). Non-responders had larger diastolic HDF ratio compared to responders (0.89 vs. 0.67, p = 0.004). ROC analysis of diastolic HDF ratio for identifying CRT non-responders had AUC of 0.88 (p = 0.005) with sensitivity 57% and specificity 100% for ratio > 0.87. Intragroup comparison found higher HDF ratio in systole compared to diastole for responders (p = 0.003), but not for non-responders (p = 0.8). CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic force ratio is a potential marker for identifying patients with heart failure and LBBB who are unlikely to benefit from CRT. Larger-scale studies are required before implementation of HDF analysis into clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-023-00955-8. BioMed Central 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10463519/ /pubmed/37620886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00955-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pola, Karin Roijer, Anders Borgquist, Rasmus Ostenfeld, Ellen Carlsson, Marcus Bakos, Zoltan Arheden, Håkan Arvidsson, Per M. Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title | Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full | Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_fullStr | Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_short | Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_sort | hemodynamic forces from 4d flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37620886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00955-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polakarin hemodynamicforcesfrom4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingpredictleftventricularremodelingfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT roijeranders hemodynamicforcesfrom4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingpredictleftventricularremodelingfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT borgquistrasmus hemodynamicforcesfrom4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingpredictleftventricularremodelingfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT ostenfeldellen hemodynamicforcesfrom4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingpredictleftventricularremodelingfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT carlssonmarcus hemodynamicforcesfrom4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingpredictleftventricularremodelingfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT bakoszoltan hemodynamicforcesfrom4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingpredictleftventricularremodelingfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT arhedenhakan hemodynamicforcesfrom4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingpredictleftventricularremodelingfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT arvidssonperm hemodynamicforcesfrom4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingpredictleftventricularremodelingfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy |