Cargando…
Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey
BACKGROUND: The initiation and use of family planning (FP) services within the first 12 months following childbirth, postpartum family planning (PPFP), promotes safe motherhood by reducing unintended pregnancies and ensuring appropriate pregnancy spacing. However, there is a paucity of information o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00243-x |
_version_ | 1785098261914189824 |
---|---|
author | Nakaggwa, Florence Kimuli, Derrick Kasule, Kenneth Katwesige, Justine Fay Kintu, Denis Ssempebwa, Rhobbinah Sevume, Solome Komakech, Patrick Mubiru, Norbert Maggwa, Baker Carrasco, Maria Augusta Namuwenge, Norah Nsubuga, Rebecca N. Amuron, Barbara Bukenya, Daraus Wandera, Bonnie |
author_facet | Nakaggwa, Florence Kimuli, Derrick Kasule, Kenneth Katwesige, Justine Fay Kintu, Denis Ssempebwa, Rhobbinah Sevume, Solome Komakech, Patrick Mubiru, Norbert Maggwa, Baker Carrasco, Maria Augusta Namuwenge, Norah Nsubuga, Rebecca N. Amuron, Barbara Bukenya, Daraus Wandera, Bonnie |
author_sort | Nakaggwa, Florence |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The initiation and use of family planning (FP) services within the first 12 months following childbirth, postpartum family planning (PPFP), promotes safe motherhood by reducing unintended pregnancies and ensuring appropriate pregnancy spacing. However, there is a paucity of information on PPFP uptake from community surveys. This study aimed to quantify the reported use of PPFP and identify predictors and barriers to PPFP uptake from a large community survey. METHODS: We analysed data collected from the 2021 Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) survey, a cross-sectional community and household survey that covered 68 districts in Uganda. The survey uses small sample sizes to designate health or administrative geographical areas which are assessed to determine whether they achieved the pre-determined target for defined indicators of interest. We abstracted and analysed data collected from mothers of children aged 12 months or younger on reproductive health and FP. PPFP use was defined as the reported use of modern FP by the mother or their partner. Associations were measured using Pearson’s chi-square test at 5% significance. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for variables that were significantly associated with PPFP use to identify the predictors of PPFP. RESULTS: Overall, 8103 mothers of children aged less than 12 years were included in the analysis; the majority of mothers, 55.8% (4521/8103) were above 24 years while 11.7% (950/8103) were 19 years and under. 98% (7942/8103) of the mothers attended at least one antenatal care (ANC) visit and 86.3% (6997/8103) delivered at a health facility. Only 10% (814/8103) of mothers who participated in the survey reported PPFP use at the time of the survey. Reporting of PPFP use was 5 times higher among mothers of children aged 7–12 months (AOR 4.9; 95%CI 4.1–5.8), 50% higher among mothers with secondary education (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.0-2.3), 80% higher among breastfeeding mothers (AOR 1.8; 95%CI 1.3–2.4) and 30% lower among those that didn’t receive a health worker visit within 3 months preceding the survey (AOR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5–0.8). Among 4.6% (372/8103) who stated a reason for non-use of PPFP, the most cited reasons for not using were breastfeeding 43% (161/372), fear of side effects 26.9% (100/372), respondent/partner opposition 17.6% (48/372) and infrequent sex 12.1% (48/372). CONCLUSION: The analysis showed a low proportion of PPFP uptake among mothers of children under 12 years. Possible barriers included child age, education, a health worker visit, and side effects and perceived benefits of possibly improperly implementing lactation amenorrhea method. Integration of social, community and health services could provide a more holistic approach to improving PPFP uptake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10463570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104635702023-08-30 Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey Nakaggwa, Florence Kimuli, Derrick Kasule, Kenneth Katwesige, Justine Fay Kintu, Denis Ssempebwa, Rhobbinah Sevume, Solome Komakech, Patrick Mubiru, Norbert Maggwa, Baker Carrasco, Maria Augusta Namuwenge, Norah Nsubuga, Rebecca N. Amuron, Barbara Bukenya, Daraus Wandera, Bonnie Contracept Reprod Med Research BACKGROUND: The initiation and use of family planning (FP) services within the first 12 months following childbirth, postpartum family planning (PPFP), promotes safe motherhood by reducing unintended pregnancies and ensuring appropriate pregnancy spacing. However, there is a paucity of information on PPFP uptake from community surveys. This study aimed to quantify the reported use of PPFP and identify predictors and barriers to PPFP uptake from a large community survey. METHODS: We analysed data collected from the 2021 Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) survey, a cross-sectional community and household survey that covered 68 districts in Uganda. The survey uses small sample sizes to designate health or administrative geographical areas which are assessed to determine whether they achieved the pre-determined target for defined indicators of interest. We abstracted and analysed data collected from mothers of children aged 12 months or younger on reproductive health and FP. PPFP use was defined as the reported use of modern FP by the mother or their partner. Associations were measured using Pearson’s chi-square test at 5% significance. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for variables that were significantly associated with PPFP use to identify the predictors of PPFP. RESULTS: Overall, 8103 mothers of children aged less than 12 years were included in the analysis; the majority of mothers, 55.8% (4521/8103) were above 24 years while 11.7% (950/8103) were 19 years and under. 98% (7942/8103) of the mothers attended at least one antenatal care (ANC) visit and 86.3% (6997/8103) delivered at a health facility. Only 10% (814/8103) of mothers who participated in the survey reported PPFP use at the time of the survey. Reporting of PPFP use was 5 times higher among mothers of children aged 7–12 months (AOR 4.9; 95%CI 4.1–5.8), 50% higher among mothers with secondary education (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.0-2.3), 80% higher among breastfeeding mothers (AOR 1.8; 95%CI 1.3–2.4) and 30% lower among those that didn’t receive a health worker visit within 3 months preceding the survey (AOR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5–0.8). Among 4.6% (372/8103) who stated a reason for non-use of PPFP, the most cited reasons for not using were breastfeeding 43% (161/372), fear of side effects 26.9% (100/372), respondent/partner opposition 17.6% (48/372) and infrequent sex 12.1% (48/372). CONCLUSION: The analysis showed a low proportion of PPFP uptake among mothers of children under 12 years. Possible barriers included child age, education, a health worker visit, and side effects and perceived benefits of possibly improperly implementing lactation amenorrhea method. Integration of social, community and health services could provide a more holistic approach to improving PPFP uptake. BioMed Central 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10463570/ /pubmed/37608320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00243-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Nakaggwa, Florence Kimuli, Derrick Kasule, Kenneth Katwesige, Justine Fay Kintu, Denis Ssempebwa, Rhobbinah Sevume, Solome Komakech, Patrick Mubiru, Norbert Maggwa, Baker Carrasco, Maria Augusta Namuwenge, Norah Nsubuga, Rebecca N. Amuron, Barbara Bukenya, Daraus Wandera, Bonnie Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey |
title | Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey |
title_full | Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey |
title_fullStr | Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey |
title_short | Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey |
title_sort | postpartum family planning uptake in uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00243-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakaggwaflorence postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT kimuliderrick postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT kasulekenneth postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT katwesigejustinefay postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT kintudenis postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT ssempebwarhobbinah postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT sevumesolome postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT komakechpatrick postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT mubirunorbert postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT maggwabaker postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT carrascomariaaugusta postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT namuwengenorah postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT nsubugarebeccan postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT amuronbarbara postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT bukenyadaraus postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey AT wanderabonnie postpartumfamilyplanninguptakeinugandafindingsfromthelotqualityassurancesamplingsurvey |