Cargando…
Proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500)
BACKGROUND: In Germany and Western Europe, gastroesophageal junction cancer (AEG) and proximal gastric cancer are currently treated with (transhiatal-extended) total gastrectomy (TG) according to the latest treatment guidelines. TG leads to a severe and long-lasting impairment of postoperative healt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02304-3 |
_version_ | 1785098264391974912 |
---|---|
author | Hipp, Julian Kuvendjiska, Jasmina Martini, Verena Hillebrecht, Hans Christian Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Diener, Markus K. |
author_facet | Hipp, Julian Kuvendjiska, Jasmina Martini, Verena Hillebrecht, Hans Christian Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Diener, Markus K. |
author_sort | Hipp, Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Germany and Western Europe, gastroesophageal junction cancer (AEG) and proximal gastric cancer are currently treated with (transhiatal-extended) total gastrectomy (TG) according to the latest treatment guidelines. TG leads to a severe and long-lasting impairment of postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the treated patients. Recent studies have suggested that HRQoL of these patients could be improved by proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (PG-DTR) without compromising oncologic safety. Our aim is therefore to conduct a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing PG-DTR with TG in AEG II/III and gastric cancer patients with overall survival as primary endpoint and HRQoL as key secondary endpoint. METHODS: This protocol is written with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P 2015) statement. We will conduct searches in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library. We will also check references of relevant studies and perform a cited reference research. Titles and abstracts of the records identified by the searches will be screened, and full texts of all potentially relevant articles will be obtained. We will consider randomized trials and non-randomized studies. The selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias of the included studies will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration). DISCUSSION: This systematic review will identify the current study pool concerning the comparison of TG and PG-DTR and help to finally refine the research questions and to allow an evidence-based trial design of the planned multicenter randomized-controlled trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. Study findings will be shared by publication in a peer-reviewed journal. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021291500. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02304-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10463580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104635802023-08-30 Proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500) Hipp, Julian Kuvendjiska, Jasmina Martini, Verena Hillebrecht, Hans Christian Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Diener, Markus K. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: In Germany and Western Europe, gastroesophageal junction cancer (AEG) and proximal gastric cancer are currently treated with (transhiatal-extended) total gastrectomy (TG) according to the latest treatment guidelines. TG leads to a severe and long-lasting impairment of postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the treated patients. Recent studies have suggested that HRQoL of these patients could be improved by proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (PG-DTR) without compromising oncologic safety. Our aim is therefore to conduct a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing PG-DTR with TG in AEG II/III and gastric cancer patients with overall survival as primary endpoint and HRQoL as key secondary endpoint. METHODS: This protocol is written with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P 2015) statement. We will conduct searches in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library. We will also check references of relevant studies and perform a cited reference research. Titles and abstracts of the records identified by the searches will be screened, and full texts of all potentially relevant articles will be obtained. We will consider randomized trials and non-randomized studies. The selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias of the included studies will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration). DISCUSSION: This systematic review will identify the current study pool concerning the comparison of TG and PG-DTR and help to finally refine the research questions and to allow an evidence-based trial design of the planned multicenter randomized-controlled trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. Study findings will be shared by publication in a peer-reviewed journal. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021291500. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02304-3. BioMed Central 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10463580/ /pubmed/37644614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02304-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Hipp, Julian Kuvendjiska, Jasmina Martini, Verena Hillebrecht, Hans Christian Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Diener, Markus K. Proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500) |
title | Proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500) |
title_full | Proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500) |
title_fullStr | Proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500) |
title_full_unstemmed | Proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500) |
title_short | Proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500) |
title_sort | proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (prospero registration number: crd42021291500) |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02304-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hippjulian proximalgastrectomyanddoubletractreconstructionvstotalgastrectomyingastricandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocolprosperoregistrationnumbercrd42021291500 AT kuvendjiskajasmina proximalgastrectomyanddoubletractreconstructionvstotalgastrectomyingastricandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocolprosperoregistrationnumbercrd42021291500 AT martiniverena proximalgastrectomyanddoubletractreconstructionvstotalgastrectomyingastricandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocolprosperoregistrationnumbercrd42021291500 AT hillebrechthanschristian proximalgastrectomyanddoubletractreconstructionvstotalgastrectomyingastricandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocolprosperoregistrationnumbercrd42021291500 AT fichtnerfeiglstefan proximalgastrectomyanddoubletractreconstructionvstotalgastrectomyingastricandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocolprosperoregistrationnumbercrd42021291500 AT dienermarkusk proximalgastrectomyanddoubletractreconstructionvstotalgastrectomyingastricandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocolprosperoregistrationnumbercrd42021291500 |