Cargando…
Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms?
BACKGROUND: The worldwide society is currently facing an epidemiological shift due to the significant improvement in life expectancy and increase in the elderly population. This shift requires the public and scientific community to highlight successful aging (SA), as an indicator representing the qu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01140-9 |
_version_ | 1785098273410777088 |
---|---|
author | Mirzaeian, Razieh Nopour, Raoof Asghari Varzaneh, Zahra Shafiee, Mohsen Shanbehzadeh, Mostafa Kazemi-Arpanahi, Hadi |
author_facet | Mirzaeian, Razieh Nopour, Raoof Asghari Varzaneh, Zahra Shafiee, Mohsen Shanbehzadeh, Mostafa Kazemi-Arpanahi, Hadi |
author_sort | Mirzaeian, Razieh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The worldwide society is currently facing an epidemiological shift due to the significant improvement in life expectancy and increase in the elderly population. This shift requires the public and scientific community to highlight successful aging (SA), as an indicator representing the quality of elderly people’s health. SA is a subjective, complex, and multidimensional concept; thus, its meaning or measuring is a difficult task. This study seeks to identify the most affecting factors on SA and fed them as input variables for constructing predictive models using machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS: Data from 1465 adults aged ≥ 60 years who were referred to health centers in Abadan city (Iran) between 2021 and 2022 were collected by interview. First, binary logistic regression (BLR) was used to identify the main factors influencing SA. Second, eight ML algorithms, including adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), bootstrap aggregating (Bagging), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XG-Boost), random forest (RF), J-48, multilayered perceptron (MLP), Naïve Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM), were trained to predict SA. Finally, their performance was evaluated using metrics derived from the confusion matrix to determine the best model. RESULTS: The experimental results showed that 44 factors had a meaningful relationship with SA as the output class. In total, the RF algorithm with sensitivity = 0.95 ± 0.01, specificity = 0.94 ± 0.01, accuracy = 0.94 ± 0.005, and F-score = 0.94 ± 0.003 yielded the best performance for predicting SA. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other selected ML methods, the effectiveness of the RF as a bagging algorithm in predicting SA was significantly better. Our developed prediction models can provide, gerontologists, geriatric nursing, healthcare administrators, and policymakers with a reliable and responsive tool to improve elderly outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10463617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104636172023-08-30 Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms? Mirzaeian, Razieh Nopour, Raoof Asghari Varzaneh, Zahra Shafiee, Mohsen Shanbehzadeh, Mostafa Kazemi-Arpanahi, Hadi Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: The worldwide society is currently facing an epidemiological shift due to the significant improvement in life expectancy and increase in the elderly population. This shift requires the public and scientific community to highlight successful aging (SA), as an indicator representing the quality of elderly people’s health. SA is a subjective, complex, and multidimensional concept; thus, its meaning or measuring is a difficult task. This study seeks to identify the most affecting factors on SA and fed them as input variables for constructing predictive models using machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS: Data from 1465 adults aged ≥ 60 years who were referred to health centers in Abadan city (Iran) between 2021 and 2022 were collected by interview. First, binary logistic regression (BLR) was used to identify the main factors influencing SA. Second, eight ML algorithms, including adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), bootstrap aggregating (Bagging), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XG-Boost), random forest (RF), J-48, multilayered perceptron (MLP), Naïve Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM), were trained to predict SA. Finally, their performance was evaluated using metrics derived from the confusion matrix to determine the best model. RESULTS: The experimental results showed that 44 factors had a meaningful relationship with SA as the output class. In total, the RF algorithm with sensitivity = 0.95 ± 0.01, specificity = 0.94 ± 0.01, accuracy = 0.94 ± 0.005, and F-score = 0.94 ± 0.003 yielded the best performance for predicting SA. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other selected ML methods, the effectiveness of the RF as a bagging algorithm in predicting SA was significantly better. Our developed prediction models can provide, gerontologists, geriatric nursing, healthcare administrators, and policymakers with a reliable and responsive tool to improve elderly outcomes. BioMed Central 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10463617/ /pubmed/37644599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01140-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mirzaeian, Razieh Nopour, Raoof Asghari Varzaneh, Zahra Shafiee, Mohsen Shanbehzadeh, Mostafa Kazemi-Arpanahi, Hadi Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms? |
title | Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms? |
title_full | Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms? |
title_fullStr | Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms? |
title_short | Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms? |
title_sort | which are best for successful aging prediction? bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01140-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mirzaeianrazieh whicharebestforsuccessfulagingpredictionbaggingboostingorsimplemachinelearningalgorithms AT nopourraoof whicharebestforsuccessfulagingpredictionbaggingboostingorsimplemachinelearningalgorithms AT asgharivarzanehzahra whicharebestforsuccessfulagingpredictionbaggingboostingorsimplemachinelearningalgorithms AT shafieemohsen whicharebestforsuccessfulagingpredictionbaggingboostingorsimplemachinelearningalgorithms AT shanbehzadehmostafa whicharebestforsuccessfulagingpredictionbaggingboostingorsimplemachinelearningalgorithms AT kazemiarpanahihadi whicharebestforsuccessfulagingpredictionbaggingboostingorsimplemachinelearningalgorithms |