Cargando…

House modifications as a malaria control tool: how does local context shape participants’ experience and interpretation in Uganda?

BACKGROUND: Evidence that house design can provide protection from malaria is growing. Housing modifications such as screening windows, doors, and ceilings, and attaching insecticide-impregnated materials to the eaves (the gap between the top of the wall and bottom of the roof), can protect against...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kayendeke, Miriam, Nabirye, Christine, Nayiga, Susan, Westercamp, Nelli, Gonahasa, Samuel, Katureebe, Agaba, Kamya, Moses R., Staedke, Sarah G., Hutchinson, Eleanor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04669-1
_version_ 1785098279016464384
author Kayendeke, Miriam
Nabirye, Christine
Nayiga, Susan
Westercamp, Nelli
Gonahasa, Samuel
Katureebe, Agaba
Kamya, Moses R.
Staedke, Sarah G.
Hutchinson, Eleanor
author_facet Kayendeke, Miriam
Nabirye, Christine
Nayiga, Susan
Westercamp, Nelli
Gonahasa, Samuel
Katureebe, Agaba
Kamya, Moses R.
Staedke, Sarah G.
Hutchinson, Eleanor
author_sort Kayendeke, Miriam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence that house design can provide protection from malaria is growing. Housing modifications such as screening windows, doors, and ceilings, and attaching insecticide-impregnated materials to the eaves (the gap between the top of the wall and bottom of the roof), can protect against malaria. To be effective at scale, however, these modifications must be adopted by household residents. There is evidence that housing modifications can be acceptable, but in-depth knowledge on the experiences and interpretation of modifications is lacking. This qualitative study was carried out to provide a holistic account of the relationship between experiences and interpretations of four types of piloted housing modifications and the local context in Jinja, Uganda. METHODS: Qualitative research was conducted between January to June 2021, before and during the installation of four types of housing modifications. The methods included nine weeks of participant observations in two study villages, nine focus group discussions with primary caregivers and heads of households (11–12 participants each), and nine key informant interviews with stakeholders and study team members. RESULTS: Most residents supported the modifications. Experiences and interpretation of the housing modifications were shaped by the different types of housing in the area and the processes through which residents finished their houses, local forms of land and property ownership, and cultural and spiritual beliefs about houses. CONCLUSIONS: To maximize the uptake and benefit of housing modifications against malaria, programme development needs to take local context into account. Forms of local land and house ownership, preferences, the social significance of housing types, and religious and spiritual ideas shape the responses to housing modifications in Jinja. These factors may be important in other setting. Trial registration Trial registration number is NCT04622241. The first draft was posted on November 9th 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10463640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104636402023-08-30 House modifications as a malaria control tool: how does local context shape participants’ experience and interpretation in Uganda? Kayendeke, Miriam Nabirye, Christine Nayiga, Susan Westercamp, Nelli Gonahasa, Samuel Katureebe, Agaba Kamya, Moses R. Staedke, Sarah G. Hutchinson, Eleanor Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Evidence that house design can provide protection from malaria is growing. Housing modifications such as screening windows, doors, and ceilings, and attaching insecticide-impregnated materials to the eaves (the gap between the top of the wall and bottom of the roof), can protect against malaria. To be effective at scale, however, these modifications must be adopted by household residents. There is evidence that housing modifications can be acceptable, but in-depth knowledge on the experiences and interpretation of modifications is lacking. This qualitative study was carried out to provide a holistic account of the relationship between experiences and interpretations of four types of piloted housing modifications and the local context in Jinja, Uganda. METHODS: Qualitative research was conducted between January to June 2021, before and during the installation of four types of housing modifications. The methods included nine weeks of participant observations in two study villages, nine focus group discussions with primary caregivers and heads of households (11–12 participants each), and nine key informant interviews with stakeholders and study team members. RESULTS: Most residents supported the modifications. Experiences and interpretation of the housing modifications were shaped by the different types of housing in the area and the processes through which residents finished their houses, local forms of land and property ownership, and cultural and spiritual beliefs about houses. CONCLUSIONS: To maximize the uptake and benefit of housing modifications against malaria, programme development needs to take local context into account. Forms of local land and house ownership, preferences, the social significance of housing types, and religious and spiritual ideas shape the responses to housing modifications in Jinja. These factors may be important in other setting. Trial registration Trial registration number is NCT04622241. The first draft was posted on November 9th 2020. BioMed Central 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10463640/ /pubmed/37626312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04669-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kayendeke, Miriam
Nabirye, Christine
Nayiga, Susan
Westercamp, Nelli
Gonahasa, Samuel
Katureebe, Agaba
Kamya, Moses R.
Staedke, Sarah G.
Hutchinson, Eleanor
House modifications as a malaria control tool: how does local context shape participants’ experience and interpretation in Uganda?
title House modifications as a malaria control tool: how does local context shape participants’ experience and interpretation in Uganda?
title_full House modifications as a malaria control tool: how does local context shape participants’ experience and interpretation in Uganda?
title_fullStr House modifications as a malaria control tool: how does local context shape participants’ experience and interpretation in Uganda?
title_full_unstemmed House modifications as a malaria control tool: how does local context shape participants’ experience and interpretation in Uganda?
title_short House modifications as a malaria control tool: how does local context shape participants’ experience and interpretation in Uganda?
title_sort house modifications as a malaria control tool: how does local context shape participants’ experience and interpretation in uganda?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04669-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kayendekemiriam housemodificationsasamalariacontroltoolhowdoeslocalcontextshapeparticipantsexperienceandinterpretationinuganda
AT nabiryechristine housemodificationsasamalariacontroltoolhowdoeslocalcontextshapeparticipantsexperienceandinterpretationinuganda
AT nayigasusan housemodificationsasamalariacontroltoolhowdoeslocalcontextshapeparticipantsexperienceandinterpretationinuganda
AT westercampnelli housemodificationsasamalariacontroltoolhowdoeslocalcontextshapeparticipantsexperienceandinterpretationinuganda
AT gonahasasamuel housemodificationsasamalariacontroltoolhowdoeslocalcontextshapeparticipantsexperienceandinterpretationinuganda
AT katureebeagaba housemodificationsasamalariacontroltoolhowdoeslocalcontextshapeparticipantsexperienceandinterpretationinuganda
AT kamyamosesr housemodificationsasamalariacontroltoolhowdoeslocalcontextshapeparticipantsexperienceandinterpretationinuganda
AT staedkesarahg housemodificationsasamalariacontroltoolhowdoeslocalcontextshapeparticipantsexperienceandinterpretationinuganda
AT hutchinsoneleanor housemodificationsasamalariacontroltoolhowdoeslocalcontextshapeparticipantsexperienceandinterpretationinuganda