Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the HEIDI BP-HW project

BACKGROUND: Eating disorders (ED) are common in Switzerland, as in other Western countries, with a prevalence of any ED of 3.5%. However, no specific prevention intervention has been evaluated in the French-speaking part of the country. In this study, we assessed the acceptability and effectiveness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrard, Isabelle, Cekic, Sezen, Bucher Della Torre, Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02607-6
_version_ 1785098286643806208
author Carrard, Isabelle
Cekic, Sezen
Bucher Della Torre, Sophie
author_facet Carrard, Isabelle
Cekic, Sezen
Bucher Della Torre, Sophie
author_sort Carrard, Isabelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eating disorders (ED) are common in Switzerland, as in other Western countries, with a prevalence of any ED of 3.5%. However, no specific prevention intervention has been evaluated in the French-speaking part of the country. In this study, we assessed the acceptability and effectiveness of two well-validated eating disorders prevention interventions: the Body Project intervention (BP), based on cognitive dissonance techniques, and the Healthy Weight intervention (HW), based on the implementation of a healthy lifestyle. METHODS: Forty female students, aged 18–28, with body dissatisfaction, were randomized into three arms: a BP group, an HW group, and a waiting-list control group (WLCG). The primary outcome measure was body dissatisfaction. Secondary outcomes were thin-ideal internalization, dietary restraint, negative affect, and ED psychopathology. Thirty-three participants completed the assessments before and after the one-month interventions or waiting period. A follow-up measurement was conducted one month after the interventions to assess the stability of the results. RESULTS: Both interventions, delivered via a virtual web platform, were considered acceptable. The reduction in body dissatisfaction was greater in the BP group (r = 0.7; p < 0.01) or the HW group (r = 0.6; p < 0.01) than in the WLCG, with large effect sizes. Dietary restraint and shape concern were also significantly reduced in the BP group (r = 0.6 and r = 0.7, respectively; p < 0.01) and HW group (r = 0.5 and r = 0.5, respectively; p < 0.05) compared to the WLCG, with moderate to large effect sizes. The results obtained in each intervention group were stable at the one-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed encouraging results in young women with body dissatisfaction, arguing in favor of the French adaptations of the BP and HW interventions. However, the feasibility of recruitment was difficult, partly due to the pandemic situation at the time of the study, and should be further considered to improve dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04558073, 22/09/2020 and Swiss National Clinical Trial Portal (SNCTP000003978). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02607-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10463671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104636712023-08-30 A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the HEIDI BP-HW project Carrard, Isabelle Cekic, Sezen Bucher Della Torre, Sophie BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Eating disorders (ED) are common in Switzerland, as in other Western countries, with a prevalence of any ED of 3.5%. However, no specific prevention intervention has been evaluated in the French-speaking part of the country. In this study, we assessed the acceptability and effectiveness of two well-validated eating disorders prevention interventions: the Body Project intervention (BP), based on cognitive dissonance techniques, and the Healthy Weight intervention (HW), based on the implementation of a healthy lifestyle. METHODS: Forty female students, aged 18–28, with body dissatisfaction, were randomized into three arms: a BP group, an HW group, and a waiting-list control group (WLCG). The primary outcome measure was body dissatisfaction. Secondary outcomes were thin-ideal internalization, dietary restraint, negative affect, and ED psychopathology. Thirty-three participants completed the assessments before and after the one-month interventions or waiting period. A follow-up measurement was conducted one month after the interventions to assess the stability of the results. RESULTS: Both interventions, delivered via a virtual web platform, were considered acceptable. The reduction in body dissatisfaction was greater in the BP group (r = 0.7; p < 0.01) or the HW group (r = 0.6; p < 0.01) than in the WLCG, with large effect sizes. Dietary restraint and shape concern were also significantly reduced in the BP group (r = 0.6 and r = 0.7, respectively; p < 0.01) and HW group (r = 0.5 and r = 0.5, respectively; p < 0.05) compared to the WLCG, with moderate to large effect sizes. The results obtained in each intervention group were stable at the one-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed encouraging results in young women with body dissatisfaction, arguing in favor of the French adaptations of the BP and HW interventions. However, the feasibility of recruitment was difficult, partly due to the pandemic situation at the time of the study, and should be further considered to improve dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04558073, 22/09/2020 and Swiss National Clinical Trial Portal (SNCTP000003978). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02607-6. BioMed Central 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10463671/ /pubmed/37612687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02607-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Carrard, Isabelle
Cekic, Sezen
Bucher Della Torre, Sophie
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the HEIDI BP-HW project
title A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the HEIDI BP-HW project
title_full A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the HEIDI BP-HW project
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the HEIDI BP-HW project
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the HEIDI BP-HW project
title_short A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the HEIDI BP-HW project
title_sort randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the heidi bp-hw project
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02607-6
work_keys_str_mv AT carrardisabelle arandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheacceptabilityandeffectivenessoftwoeatingdisorderspreventioninterventionstheheidibphwproject
AT cekicsezen arandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheacceptabilityandeffectivenessoftwoeatingdisorderspreventioninterventionstheheidibphwproject
AT bucherdellatorresophie arandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheacceptabilityandeffectivenessoftwoeatingdisorderspreventioninterventionstheheidibphwproject
AT carrardisabelle randomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheacceptabilityandeffectivenessoftwoeatingdisorderspreventioninterventionstheheidibphwproject
AT cekicsezen randomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheacceptabilityandeffectivenessoftwoeatingdisorderspreventioninterventionstheheidibphwproject
AT bucherdellatorresophie randomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheacceptabilityandeffectivenessoftwoeatingdisorderspreventioninterventionstheheidibphwproject