Cargando…
The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing interest in investigating the human gut virome for its influence on the gut bacterial community and its putative influence on the trajectory towards health or disease. Most gut virome studies are based on sequencing of stored fecal samples. However, relatively litt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37635262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9 |
_version_ | 1785098292498006016 |
---|---|
author | Zhai, Xichuan Castro-Mejía, Josué L. Gobbi, Alex Aslampaloglou, Antonios Kot, Witold Nielsen, Dennis S. Deng, Ling |
author_facet | Zhai, Xichuan Castro-Mejía, Josué L. Gobbi, Alex Aslampaloglou, Antonios Kot, Witold Nielsen, Dennis S. Deng, Ling |
author_sort | Zhai, Xichuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is an increasing interest in investigating the human gut virome for its influence on the gut bacterial community and its putative influence on the trajectory towards health or disease. Most gut virome studies are based on sequencing of stored fecal samples. However, relatively little is known about how conventional storage buffers and storage conditions affect the infectivity of bacteriophages and influence the downstream metavirome sequencing. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the infectivity and genome recovery rate of different spiked bacteriophages (T4, c2 and Phi X174) are variable and highly dependent on storage buffers. Regardless of the storage temperature and timespan, all tested phages immediately lost 100% (DNA/RNA Shield) or more than 90% (StayRNA and RNAlater) of their infectivity. Generally, in SM buffer at 4 °C phage infectivity was preserved for up to 30 days and phage DNA integrity was maintained for up to 100 days. While in CANVAX, the most effective buffer, all spiked phage genomes were preserved for at least 100 days. Prolonged storage time (500 days) at – 80 °C impacted viral diversity differently in the different buffers. Samples stored in CANVAX or DNA/RNA Shield buffer had the least shifts in metavirome composition, after prolonged storage, but they yielded more contigs classified as “uncharacterised”. Moreover, in contrast to the SM buffer, these storage buffers yielded a higher fraction of bacterial DNA in metavirome-sequencing libraries. We demonstrated that the latter was due to inactivation of the DNases employed to remove extra-cellular DNA during virome extraction. The latter could be partly avoided by employing additional washing steps prior to virome extraction. CONCLUSION: Fecal sample storage buffers and storage conditions (time and temperature) strongly influence bacteriophage infectivity and viral composition as determined by plaque assay and metavirome sequencing. The choice of buffer had a larger effect than storage temperature and storage time on the quality of the viral sequences and analyses. Based on these results, we recommend storage of fecal virome samples at in SM buffer at 4 °C for the isolation of viruses and at – 80 °C for metagenomic applications if practically feasible (i.e., access to cold storage). For fecal samples stored in other buffers, samples should be cleared of these buffers before viral extraction and sequencing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10463696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104636962023-08-30 The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses Zhai, Xichuan Castro-Mejía, Josué L. Gobbi, Alex Aslampaloglou, Antonios Kot, Witold Nielsen, Dennis S. Deng, Ling Microbiome Methodology BACKGROUND: There is an increasing interest in investigating the human gut virome for its influence on the gut bacterial community and its putative influence on the trajectory towards health or disease. Most gut virome studies are based on sequencing of stored fecal samples. However, relatively little is known about how conventional storage buffers and storage conditions affect the infectivity of bacteriophages and influence the downstream metavirome sequencing. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the infectivity and genome recovery rate of different spiked bacteriophages (T4, c2 and Phi X174) are variable and highly dependent on storage buffers. Regardless of the storage temperature and timespan, all tested phages immediately lost 100% (DNA/RNA Shield) or more than 90% (StayRNA and RNAlater) of their infectivity. Generally, in SM buffer at 4 °C phage infectivity was preserved for up to 30 days and phage DNA integrity was maintained for up to 100 days. While in CANVAX, the most effective buffer, all spiked phage genomes were preserved for at least 100 days. Prolonged storage time (500 days) at – 80 °C impacted viral diversity differently in the different buffers. Samples stored in CANVAX or DNA/RNA Shield buffer had the least shifts in metavirome composition, after prolonged storage, but they yielded more contigs classified as “uncharacterised”. Moreover, in contrast to the SM buffer, these storage buffers yielded a higher fraction of bacterial DNA in metavirome-sequencing libraries. We demonstrated that the latter was due to inactivation of the DNases employed to remove extra-cellular DNA during virome extraction. The latter could be partly avoided by employing additional washing steps prior to virome extraction. CONCLUSION: Fecal sample storage buffers and storage conditions (time and temperature) strongly influence bacteriophage infectivity and viral composition as determined by plaque assay and metavirome sequencing. The choice of buffer had a larger effect than storage temperature and storage time on the quality of the viral sequences and analyses. Based on these results, we recommend storage of fecal virome samples at in SM buffer at 4 °C for the isolation of viruses and at – 80 °C for metagenomic applications if practically feasible (i.e., access to cold storage). For fecal samples stored in other buffers, samples should be cleared of these buffers before viral extraction and sequencing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9. BioMed Central 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10463696/ /pubmed/37635262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Zhai, Xichuan Castro-Mejía, Josué L. Gobbi, Alex Aslampaloglou, Antonios Kot, Witold Nielsen, Dennis S. Deng, Ling The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses |
title | The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses |
title_full | The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses |
title_fullStr | The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses |
title_short | The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses |
title_sort | impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37635262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaixichuan theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT castromejiajosuel theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT gobbialex theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT aslampaloglouantonios theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT kotwitold theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT nielsendenniss theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT dengling theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT zhaixichuan impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT castromejiajosuel impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT gobbialex impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT aslampaloglouantonios impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT kotwitold impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT nielsendenniss impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses AT dengling impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses |