Cargando…

The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing interest in investigating the human gut virome for its influence on the gut bacterial community and its putative influence on the trajectory towards health or disease. Most gut virome studies are based on sequencing of stored fecal samples. However, relatively litt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhai, Xichuan, Castro-Mejía, Josué L., Gobbi, Alex, Aslampaloglou, Antonios, Kot, Witold, Nielsen, Dennis S., Deng, Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37635262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9
_version_ 1785098292498006016
author Zhai, Xichuan
Castro-Mejía, Josué L.
Gobbi, Alex
Aslampaloglou, Antonios
Kot, Witold
Nielsen, Dennis S.
Deng, Ling
author_facet Zhai, Xichuan
Castro-Mejía, Josué L.
Gobbi, Alex
Aslampaloglou, Antonios
Kot, Witold
Nielsen, Dennis S.
Deng, Ling
author_sort Zhai, Xichuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an increasing interest in investigating the human gut virome for its influence on the gut bacterial community and its putative influence on the trajectory towards health or disease. Most gut virome studies are based on sequencing of stored fecal samples. However, relatively little is known about how conventional storage buffers and storage conditions affect the infectivity of bacteriophages and influence the downstream metavirome sequencing. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the infectivity and genome recovery rate of different spiked bacteriophages (T4, c2 and Phi X174) are variable and highly dependent on storage buffers. Regardless of the storage temperature and timespan, all tested phages immediately lost 100% (DNA/RNA Shield) or more than 90% (StayRNA and RNAlater) of their infectivity. Generally, in SM buffer at 4 °C phage infectivity was preserved for up to 30 days and phage DNA integrity was maintained for up to 100 days. While in CANVAX, the most effective buffer, all spiked phage genomes were preserved for at least 100 days. Prolonged storage time (500 days) at – 80 °C impacted viral diversity differently in the different buffers. Samples stored in CANVAX or DNA/RNA Shield buffer had the least shifts in metavirome composition, after prolonged storage, but they yielded more contigs classified as “uncharacterised”. Moreover, in contrast to the SM buffer, these storage buffers yielded a higher fraction of bacterial DNA in metavirome-sequencing libraries. We demonstrated that the latter was due to inactivation of the DNases employed to remove extra-cellular DNA during virome extraction. The latter could be partly avoided by employing additional washing steps prior to virome extraction. CONCLUSION: Fecal sample storage buffers and storage conditions (time and temperature) strongly influence bacteriophage infectivity and viral composition as determined by plaque assay and metavirome sequencing. The choice of buffer had a larger effect than storage temperature and storage time on the quality of the viral sequences and analyses. Based on these results, we recommend storage of fecal virome samples at in SM buffer at 4 °C for the isolation of viruses and at – 80 °C for metagenomic applications if practically feasible (i.e., access to cold storage). For fecal samples stored in other buffers, samples should be cleared of these buffers before viral extraction and sequencing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10463696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104636962023-08-30 The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses Zhai, Xichuan Castro-Mejía, Josué L. Gobbi, Alex Aslampaloglou, Antonios Kot, Witold Nielsen, Dennis S. Deng, Ling Microbiome Methodology BACKGROUND: There is an increasing interest in investigating the human gut virome for its influence on the gut bacterial community and its putative influence on the trajectory towards health or disease. Most gut virome studies are based on sequencing of stored fecal samples. However, relatively little is known about how conventional storage buffers and storage conditions affect the infectivity of bacteriophages and influence the downstream metavirome sequencing. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the infectivity and genome recovery rate of different spiked bacteriophages (T4, c2 and Phi X174) are variable and highly dependent on storage buffers. Regardless of the storage temperature and timespan, all tested phages immediately lost 100% (DNA/RNA Shield) or more than 90% (StayRNA and RNAlater) of their infectivity. Generally, in SM buffer at 4 °C phage infectivity was preserved for up to 30 days and phage DNA integrity was maintained for up to 100 days. While in CANVAX, the most effective buffer, all spiked phage genomes were preserved for at least 100 days. Prolonged storage time (500 days) at – 80 °C impacted viral diversity differently in the different buffers. Samples stored in CANVAX or DNA/RNA Shield buffer had the least shifts in metavirome composition, after prolonged storage, but they yielded more contigs classified as “uncharacterised”. Moreover, in contrast to the SM buffer, these storage buffers yielded a higher fraction of bacterial DNA in metavirome-sequencing libraries. We demonstrated that the latter was due to inactivation of the DNases employed to remove extra-cellular DNA during virome extraction. The latter could be partly avoided by employing additional washing steps prior to virome extraction. CONCLUSION: Fecal sample storage buffers and storage conditions (time and temperature) strongly influence bacteriophage infectivity and viral composition as determined by plaque assay and metavirome sequencing. The choice of buffer had a larger effect than storage temperature and storage time on the quality of the viral sequences and analyses. Based on these results, we recommend storage of fecal virome samples at in SM buffer at 4 °C for the isolation of viruses and at – 80 °C for metagenomic applications if practically feasible (i.e., access to cold storage). For fecal samples stored in other buffers, samples should be cleared of these buffers before viral extraction and sequencing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9. BioMed Central 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10463696/ /pubmed/37635262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Zhai, Xichuan
Castro-Mejía, Josué L.
Gobbi, Alex
Aslampaloglou, Antonios
Kot, Witold
Nielsen, Dennis S.
Deng, Ling
The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses
title The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses
title_full The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses
title_fullStr The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses
title_full_unstemmed The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses
title_short The impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses
title_sort impact of storage buffer and storage conditions on fecal samples for bacteriophage infectivity and metavirome analyses
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37635262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01632-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaixichuan theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT castromejiajosuel theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT gobbialex theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT aslampaloglouantonios theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT kotwitold theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT nielsendenniss theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT dengling theimpactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT zhaixichuan impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT castromejiajosuel impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT gobbialex impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT aslampaloglouantonios impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT kotwitold impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT nielsendenniss impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses
AT dengling impactofstoragebufferandstorageconditionsonfecalsamplesforbacteriophageinfectivityandmetaviromeanalyses