Cargando…

The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine short-term and long-term outcomes according to time intervals after stenting and compared them with those of emergency surgery (ES) in colorectal cancer (CRC) with malignant obstruction. METHODS: CRC with malignant obstructions was reviewed retrospectively b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Na, Ji Eun, Kim, Eun Ran, Kim, Ji Eun, Hong, Sung Noh, Kim, Young Ho, Chang, Dong Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03130-6
_version_ 1785098356621574144
author Na, Ji Eun
Kim, Eun Ran
Kim, Ji Eun
Hong, Sung Noh
Kim, Young Ho
Chang, Dong Kyung
author_facet Na, Ji Eun
Kim, Eun Ran
Kim, Ji Eun
Hong, Sung Noh
Kim, Young Ho
Chang, Dong Kyung
author_sort Na, Ji Eun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine short-term and long-term outcomes according to time intervals after stenting and compared them with those of emergency surgery (ES) in colorectal cancer (CRC) with malignant obstruction. METHODS: CRC with malignant obstructions was reviewed retrospectively between January 2008 and July 2018. Of a total of 539 patients who visited the emergency room and underwent ES, 133 were enrolled in the ES group. Of a total of 567 patients who initially received stenting and subsequently underwent elective surgery, 220 were enrolled in the SEMS group. The interval between SEMS placement and elective surgery was classified as < 11 days, 11–17 days, and > 17 days. RESULTS: For those who received SEMS (n = 220), those with a time interval of 11–17 days (n = 97) had fewer hospital days than those with a time interval of < 11 days (n = 68) (8 days vs. 15 days) and less stoma formation than those with a time interval of > 17 days (n = 55) (1.0% vs. 14.6%). Multivariable analysis revealed a decreased risk of death for the group with a time interval of 11–17 days (20.6%) compared to the ES group (31.6%) (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.24–0.97). Disease-free survival was comparable between the SEMS and ES groups regardless of the time interval (log-rank p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: The time interval of 11–17 days after stenting to elective surgery appeared to be associated with the most favorable outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03130-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10463965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104639652023-08-30 The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery Na, Ji Eun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Ji Eun Hong, Sung Noh Kim, Young Ho Chang, Dong Kyung World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine short-term and long-term outcomes according to time intervals after stenting and compared them with those of emergency surgery (ES) in colorectal cancer (CRC) with malignant obstruction. METHODS: CRC with malignant obstructions was reviewed retrospectively between January 2008 and July 2018. Of a total of 539 patients who visited the emergency room and underwent ES, 133 were enrolled in the ES group. Of a total of 567 patients who initially received stenting and subsequently underwent elective surgery, 220 were enrolled in the SEMS group. The interval between SEMS placement and elective surgery was classified as < 11 days, 11–17 days, and > 17 days. RESULTS: For those who received SEMS (n = 220), those with a time interval of 11–17 days (n = 97) had fewer hospital days than those with a time interval of < 11 days (n = 68) (8 days vs. 15 days) and less stoma formation than those with a time interval of > 17 days (n = 55) (1.0% vs. 14.6%). Multivariable analysis revealed a decreased risk of death for the group with a time interval of 11–17 days (20.6%) compared to the ES group (31.6%) (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.24–0.97). Disease-free survival was comparable between the SEMS and ES groups regardless of the time interval (log-rank p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: The time interval of 11–17 days after stenting to elective surgery appeared to be associated with the most favorable outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03130-6. BioMed Central 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10463965/ /pubmed/37612670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03130-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Na, Ji Eun
Kim, Eun Ran
Kim, Ji Eun
Hong, Sung Noh
Kim, Young Ho
Chang, Dong Kyung
The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery
title The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery
title_full The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery
title_fullStr The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery
title_full_unstemmed The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery
title_short The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery
title_sort optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03130-6
work_keys_str_mv AT najieun theoptimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT kimeunran theoptimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT kimjieun theoptimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT hongsungnoh theoptimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT kimyoungho theoptimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT changdongkyung theoptimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT najieun optimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT kimeunran optimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT kimjieun optimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT hongsungnoh optimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT kimyoungho optimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery
AT changdongkyung optimalsurgerytimingafterstentingincolorectalcancerpatientswithmalignantobstructionadditionallycomparedwithemergencysurgery