Cargando…

Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends all dialysis patients undertake routine screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in high income countries such as Australia. However, we employ a targeted screening approach in our Australian dialysis unit in line with local and so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, Hannah, Nelson, Craig, Crikis, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03304-0
_version_ 1785098371133865984
author Wallace, Hannah
Nelson, Craig
Crikis, Sandra
author_facet Wallace, Hannah
Nelson, Craig
Crikis, Sandra
author_sort Wallace, Hannah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends all dialysis patients undertake routine screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in high income countries such as Australia. However, we employ a targeted screening approach in our Australian dialysis unit in line with local and some international guidelines. We analysed our practices to assess the validity of our approach. METHODS: A retrospective review of new dialysis patients during the period 2012–2018 was undertaken. Patient records were reviewed for basic demographic data, comorbidities, LTBI screening using Quantiferon Gold (QFG), and outcomes, including episodes of active TB, to June 2020. RESULTS: 472 patients were included. WHO high risk country of origin patients accounted for 22% (n = 103). 229 patients (48.5%) were screened using QFG. The single main indication for screening was transplantation waitlisting. 34 patients had a positive QFG result. Active tuberculosis developed in two patients during the observation period. Both occurred in the screened cohort, the cases having previously tested negative via QFG at 11 and 16 months, prior to the development of active tuberculosis. No patients in the unscreened cohort developed active tuberculosis during the observation period. WHO high risk country of origin was associated with positive QFG status, odds ratio 10.4 (95% CI 3.3–31.2). CONCLUSION: The data failed to show a benefit from widening of the screening program within our dialysis unit. However, a much larger sample size will be required to confidently assess the impact of the current approach on patient outcomes. Analysis of current screening practices and outcomes across all Australian dialysis services is warranted to assess the risks and benefits of widening the screening practices to include all dialysis patients as recommended by the WHO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10464025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104640252023-08-30 Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit Wallace, Hannah Nelson, Craig Crikis, Sandra BMC Nephrol Research BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends all dialysis patients undertake routine screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in high income countries such as Australia. However, we employ a targeted screening approach in our Australian dialysis unit in line with local and some international guidelines. We analysed our practices to assess the validity of our approach. METHODS: A retrospective review of new dialysis patients during the period 2012–2018 was undertaken. Patient records were reviewed for basic demographic data, comorbidities, LTBI screening using Quantiferon Gold (QFG), and outcomes, including episodes of active TB, to June 2020. RESULTS: 472 patients were included. WHO high risk country of origin patients accounted for 22% (n = 103). 229 patients (48.5%) were screened using QFG. The single main indication for screening was transplantation waitlisting. 34 patients had a positive QFG result. Active tuberculosis developed in two patients during the observation period. Both occurred in the screened cohort, the cases having previously tested negative via QFG at 11 and 16 months, prior to the development of active tuberculosis. No patients in the unscreened cohort developed active tuberculosis during the observation period. WHO high risk country of origin was associated with positive QFG status, odds ratio 10.4 (95% CI 3.3–31.2). CONCLUSION: The data failed to show a benefit from widening of the screening program within our dialysis unit. However, a much larger sample size will be required to confidently assess the impact of the current approach on patient outcomes. Analysis of current screening practices and outcomes across all Australian dialysis services is warranted to assess the risks and benefits of widening the screening practices to include all dialysis patients as recommended by the WHO. BioMed Central 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10464025/ /pubmed/37612629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03304-0 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wallace, Hannah
Nelson, Craig
Crikis, Sandra
Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit
title Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit
title_full Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit
title_fullStr Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit
title_full_unstemmed Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit
title_short Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit
title_sort tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03304-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wallacehannah tuberculosisscreeningpracticesandoutcomesinanaustraliandialysisunit
AT nelsoncraig tuberculosisscreeningpracticesandoutcomesinanaustraliandialysisunit
AT crikissandra tuberculosisscreeningpracticesandoutcomesinanaustraliandialysisunit