Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis — a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is a long-term complication of pelvic radiotherapy that manifests as rectal bleeding, diarrhoea, fistula formation and obstruction. Treatments such as endoscopic argon plasma coagulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy and rectal topical formalin have imposed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Liangzhe, Xiao, Nana, Liang, Jinjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02294-2
_version_ 1785098421698297856
author Liu, Liangzhe
Xiao, Nana
Liang, Jinjun
author_facet Liu, Liangzhe
Xiao, Nana
Liang, Jinjun
author_sort Liu, Liangzhe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is a long-term complication of pelvic radiotherapy that manifests as rectal bleeding, diarrhoea, fistula formation and obstruction. Treatments such as endoscopic argon plasma coagulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy and rectal topical formalin have imposed a significant medical burden on CRP patients. In contrast, oral therapies offer a more accessible and acceptable option for managing CRP. Here, we conducted a systematic review of the efficacy of oral treatments for CRP to assess their potential as an effective and convenient treatment option for this condition. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese VIP in February 2021. We included post-radiotherapy participants with CRP that compared oral medicine alone or in combination with other treatments versus control treatments. The primary outcomes were bleeding, diarrhoea and symptom score. Heterogeneity between studies was checked using Cochrane Q test statistics and I(2) test statistics. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: We included 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 retrospective study with 898 participants. Three placebo-controlled trials evaluated the effects of oral sucralfate on CRP, with meta-analysis showing no significant different with placebo arm. Four trials on TCM demonstrated significant improvement of symptoms, especially for the 3 trials on oral TCM drinks. Retinyl palmitate and high-fibre diet were found to reduce rectal bleeding. The combination of oral pentoxifylline and tocopherol did not significantly change the process of CRP. CONCLUSIONS: Our study implies that oral TCM drinks, retinyl palmitate and a high-fiber diet showed significant improvement in CRP symptoms, but not with the combination of oral pentoxifylline and tocopherol. Further multicentre, larger-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of these treatments and optimize treatment strategies, ultimately improving the quality of life for patients with CRP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02294-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10464232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104642322023-08-30 Comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis — a systematic review Liu, Liangzhe Xiao, Nana Liang, Jinjun Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is a long-term complication of pelvic radiotherapy that manifests as rectal bleeding, diarrhoea, fistula formation and obstruction. Treatments such as endoscopic argon plasma coagulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy and rectal topical formalin have imposed a significant medical burden on CRP patients. In contrast, oral therapies offer a more accessible and acceptable option for managing CRP. Here, we conducted a systematic review of the efficacy of oral treatments for CRP to assess their potential as an effective and convenient treatment option for this condition. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese VIP in February 2021. We included post-radiotherapy participants with CRP that compared oral medicine alone or in combination with other treatments versus control treatments. The primary outcomes were bleeding, diarrhoea and symptom score. Heterogeneity between studies was checked using Cochrane Q test statistics and I(2) test statistics. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: We included 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 retrospective study with 898 participants. Three placebo-controlled trials evaluated the effects of oral sucralfate on CRP, with meta-analysis showing no significant different with placebo arm. Four trials on TCM demonstrated significant improvement of symptoms, especially for the 3 trials on oral TCM drinks. Retinyl palmitate and high-fibre diet were found to reduce rectal bleeding. The combination of oral pentoxifylline and tocopherol did not significantly change the process of CRP. CONCLUSIONS: Our study implies that oral TCM drinks, retinyl palmitate and a high-fiber diet showed significant improvement in CRP symptoms, but not with the combination of oral pentoxifylline and tocopherol. Further multicentre, larger-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of these treatments and optimize treatment strategies, ultimately improving the quality of life for patients with CRP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02294-2. BioMed Central 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10464232/ /pubmed/37608385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02294-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Liangzhe
Xiao, Nana
Liang, Jinjun
Comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis — a systematic review
title Comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis — a systematic review
title_full Comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis — a systematic review
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis — a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis — a systematic review
title_short Comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis — a systematic review
title_sort comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis — a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02294-2
work_keys_str_mv AT liuliangzhe comparativeefficacyoforaldrugsforchronicradiationproctitisasystematicreview
AT xiaonana comparativeefficacyoforaldrugsforchronicradiationproctitisasystematicreview
AT liangjinjun comparativeefficacyoforaldrugsforchronicradiationproctitisasystematicreview