Cargando…

Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the best operative procedure in human participants with a displaced or non-displaced femoral neck fracture comparing cannulated screw (CS) fixation, dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of surgical and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramadanov, Nikolai, Jóźwiak, Katarzyna, Hauptmann, Michael, Lazaru, Philip, Marinova-Kichikova, Polina, Dimitrov, Dobromir, Becker, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04114-8
_version_ 1785098451245072384
author Ramadanov, Nikolai
Jóźwiak, Katarzyna
Hauptmann, Michael
Lazaru, Philip
Marinova-Kichikova, Polina
Dimitrov, Dobromir
Becker, Roland
author_facet Ramadanov, Nikolai
Jóźwiak, Katarzyna
Hauptmann, Michael
Lazaru, Philip
Marinova-Kichikova, Polina
Dimitrov, Dobromir
Becker, Roland
author_sort Ramadanov, Nikolai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the best operative procedure in human participants with a displaced or non-displaced femoral neck fracture comparing cannulated screw (CS) fixation, dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of surgical and functional outcomes, reoperation and postoperative complications. METHODS: We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, CINAHL, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs up to 31 July 2022. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed to assess the comparative effects of the four operative procedures, using fixed-effects and random-effects models. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for continuous variables and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated for binary variables. RESULTS: A total of 33 RCTs with 5703 patients were included in our network meta-analysis. CS fixation was best in terms of operation time (CS: MD = − 57.70, 95% CI − 72.78; − 42.62; DHS: MD = − 53.56, 95% CI − 76.17; − 30.95; HA: MD = − 20.90, 95% CI − 30.65; − 11.15; THA: MD = 1.00 reference) and intraoperative blood loss (CS: MD = − 3.67, 95% CI − 4.44; − 2.90; DHS: MD = − 3.20, 95% CI − 4.97; − 1.43; HA: MD = − 1.20, 95% CI − 1.73; − 0.67; THA: MD = 1.00 reference). In life quality and functional outcome, measured at different time points with EQ-5D and the Harris Hip Score (HHS), THA ranked first and HA second (e.g. EQ-5D 2 years postoperatively: CS: MD = − 0.20, 95% CI − 0.29; − 0.11; HA: MD = − 0.09, 95% CI − 0.17; − 0.02; THA: MD = 1.00 reference; HHS 2 years postoperatively: CS: MD = − 5.50, 95% CI − 9.98; − 1.03; DHS: MD = − 8.93, 95% CI − 15.08; − 2.78; HA: MD = − 3.65, 95% CI − 6.74; − 0.57; THA: MD = 1.00 reference). CS fixation had the highest reoperation risk, followed by DHS fixation, HA, and THA (CS: OR = 9.98, 95% CI 4.60; 21.63; DHS: OR = 5.07, 95% CI 2.15; 11.96; HA: OR = 1.60, 95% CI 0.89; 2.89; THA: OR = 1.00 reference). CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures, HHS, EQ-5D, and reoperation risk showed an advantage of THA and HA compared with CS and DHS fixation. Based on these findings, we recommend that hip arthroplasty should be preferred and internal fixation of femoral neck fractures should only be considered in individual cases. Level of evidence I: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Trial registration: PROSPERO on 10 August 2022 (CRD42022350293). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04114-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10464356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104643562023-08-30 Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients Ramadanov, Nikolai Jóźwiak, Katarzyna Hauptmann, Michael Lazaru, Philip Marinova-Kichikova, Polina Dimitrov, Dobromir Becker, Roland J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the best operative procedure in human participants with a displaced or non-displaced femoral neck fracture comparing cannulated screw (CS) fixation, dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of surgical and functional outcomes, reoperation and postoperative complications. METHODS: We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, CINAHL, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs up to 31 July 2022. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed to assess the comparative effects of the four operative procedures, using fixed-effects and random-effects models. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for continuous variables and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated for binary variables. RESULTS: A total of 33 RCTs with 5703 patients were included in our network meta-analysis. CS fixation was best in terms of operation time (CS: MD = − 57.70, 95% CI − 72.78; − 42.62; DHS: MD = − 53.56, 95% CI − 76.17; − 30.95; HA: MD = − 20.90, 95% CI − 30.65; − 11.15; THA: MD = 1.00 reference) and intraoperative blood loss (CS: MD = − 3.67, 95% CI − 4.44; − 2.90; DHS: MD = − 3.20, 95% CI − 4.97; − 1.43; HA: MD = − 1.20, 95% CI − 1.73; − 0.67; THA: MD = 1.00 reference). In life quality and functional outcome, measured at different time points with EQ-5D and the Harris Hip Score (HHS), THA ranked first and HA second (e.g. EQ-5D 2 years postoperatively: CS: MD = − 0.20, 95% CI − 0.29; − 0.11; HA: MD = − 0.09, 95% CI − 0.17; − 0.02; THA: MD = 1.00 reference; HHS 2 years postoperatively: CS: MD = − 5.50, 95% CI − 9.98; − 1.03; DHS: MD = − 8.93, 95% CI − 15.08; − 2.78; HA: MD = − 3.65, 95% CI − 6.74; − 0.57; THA: MD = 1.00 reference). CS fixation had the highest reoperation risk, followed by DHS fixation, HA, and THA (CS: OR = 9.98, 95% CI 4.60; 21.63; DHS: OR = 5.07, 95% CI 2.15; 11.96; HA: OR = 1.60, 95% CI 0.89; 2.89; THA: OR = 1.00 reference). CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures, HHS, EQ-5D, and reoperation risk showed an advantage of THA and HA compared with CS and DHS fixation. Based on these findings, we recommend that hip arthroplasty should be preferred and internal fixation of femoral neck fractures should only be considered in individual cases. Level of evidence I: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Trial registration: PROSPERO on 10 August 2022 (CRD42022350293). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04114-8. BioMed Central 2023-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10464356/ /pubmed/37626370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04114-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ramadanov, Nikolai
Jóźwiak, Katarzyna
Hauptmann, Michael
Lazaru, Philip
Marinova-Kichikova, Polina
Dimitrov, Dobromir
Becker, Roland
Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients
title Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients
title_full Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients
title_fullStr Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients
title_full_unstemmed Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients
title_short Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients
title_sort cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04114-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ramadanovnikolai cannulatedscrewsversusdynamichipscrewversushemiarthroplastyversustotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithdisplacedandnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandfrequentistnetworkmetaanalysisof5703patients
AT jozwiakkatarzyna cannulatedscrewsversusdynamichipscrewversushemiarthroplastyversustotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithdisplacedandnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandfrequentistnetworkmetaanalysisof5703patients
AT hauptmannmichael cannulatedscrewsversusdynamichipscrewversushemiarthroplastyversustotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithdisplacedandnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandfrequentistnetworkmetaanalysisof5703patients
AT lazaruphilip cannulatedscrewsversusdynamichipscrewversushemiarthroplastyversustotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithdisplacedandnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandfrequentistnetworkmetaanalysisof5703patients
AT marinovakichikovapolina cannulatedscrewsversusdynamichipscrewversushemiarthroplastyversustotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithdisplacedandnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandfrequentistnetworkmetaanalysisof5703patients
AT dimitrovdobromir cannulatedscrewsversusdynamichipscrewversushemiarthroplastyversustotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithdisplacedandnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandfrequentistnetworkmetaanalysisof5703patients
AT beckerroland cannulatedscrewsversusdynamichipscrewversushemiarthroplastyversustotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithdisplacedandnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandfrequentistnetworkmetaanalysisof5703patients