Cargando…
First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study
PURPOSE: To share our experience using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) treatment for focal therapy of localized prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 10/2019 and 06/2021 TULSA treatment for localized PCa was performed in 22 men (mean age: 67 ± 7 years, mean initial PSA: 6.8...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01306-6 |
_version_ | 1785098463176818688 |
---|---|
author | Peters, Inga Hensen, Bennet Glandorf, Julian Gutberlet, Marcel Dohna, Martha Struckmann, Steffen Kuczyk, Markus Antonius Wacker, Frank Hellms, Susanne |
author_facet | Peters, Inga Hensen, Bennet Glandorf, Julian Gutberlet, Marcel Dohna, Martha Struckmann, Steffen Kuczyk, Markus Antonius Wacker, Frank Hellms, Susanne |
author_sort | Peters, Inga |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To share our experience using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) treatment for focal therapy of localized prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 10/2019 and 06/2021 TULSA treatment for localized PCa was performed in 22 men (mean age: 67 ± 7 years, mean initial PSA: 6.8 ± 2.1 ng/ml, ISUP 1 in n = 6, ISUP 2 in n = 14 and 2 patients with recurrence after previous radiotherapy). Patients were selected by an interdisciplinary team, taking clinical parameters, histopathology from targeted or systematic biopsies, mpMRI and patients preferences into consideration. Patients were thoroughly informed about alternative treatment options and that TULSA is an individual treatment approach. High-intensity ultrasound was applied using an ablation device placed in the prostatic urethra. Heat-development within the prostatic tissue was monitored using MR-thermometry. Challenges during the ablation procedure and follow-up of oncologic and functional outcome of at least 12 months after TULSA treatment were documented. RESULTS: No major adverse events were documented. In the 12 month follow-up period, no significant changes of urinary continence, irritative/obstructive voiding symptoms, bowel irritation or hormonal symptoms were reported according to the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) score. Erectile function was significantly impaired 3–6 months (p < 0.01) and 9–12 months (p < 0.05) after TULSA. PSA values significantly decreased after therapy (2.1 ± 1.8 vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 ng/ml, p < 0.001). PCa recurrence rate was 23% (5/22 patients). CONCLUSION: Establishment of TULSA in clinical routine was unproblematic, short-term outcome seems to be encouraging. The risk of erectile function impairment requires elaborate information of the patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10464407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104644072023-08-30 First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study Peters, Inga Hensen, Bennet Glandorf, Julian Gutberlet, Marcel Dohna, Martha Struckmann, Steffen Kuczyk, Markus Antonius Wacker, Frank Hellms, Susanne BMC Urol Research PURPOSE: To share our experience using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) treatment for focal therapy of localized prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 10/2019 and 06/2021 TULSA treatment for localized PCa was performed in 22 men (mean age: 67 ± 7 years, mean initial PSA: 6.8 ± 2.1 ng/ml, ISUP 1 in n = 6, ISUP 2 in n = 14 and 2 patients with recurrence after previous radiotherapy). Patients were selected by an interdisciplinary team, taking clinical parameters, histopathology from targeted or systematic biopsies, mpMRI and patients preferences into consideration. Patients were thoroughly informed about alternative treatment options and that TULSA is an individual treatment approach. High-intensity ultrasound was applied using an ablation device placed in the prostatic urethra. Heat-development within the prostatic tissue was monitored using MR-thermometry. Challenges during the ablation procedure and follow-up of oncologic and functional outcome of at least 12 months after TULSA treatment were documented. RESULTS: No major adverse events were documented. In the 12 month follow-up period, no significant changes of urinary continence, irritative/obstructive voiding symptoms, bowel irritation or hormonal symptoms were reported according to the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) score. Erectile function was significantly impaired 3–6 months (p < 0.01) and 9–12 months (p < 0.05) after TULSA. PSA values significantly decreased after therapy (2.1 ± 1.8 vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 ng/ml, p < 0.001). PCa recurrence rate was 23% (5/22 patients). CONCLUSION: Establishment of TULSA in clinical routine was unproblematic, short-term outcome seems to be encouraging. The risk of erectile function impairment requires elaborate information of the patient. BioMed Central 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10464407/ /pubmed/37644453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01306-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Peters, Inga Hensen, Bennet Glandorf, Julian Gutberlet, Marcel Dohna, Martha Struckmann, Steffen Kuczyk, Markus Antonius Wacker, Frank Hellms, Susanne First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study |
title | First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study |
title_full | First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study |
title_fullStr | First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study |
title_full_unstemmed | First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study |
title_short | First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study |
title_sort | first experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (tulsa) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01306-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersinga firstexperiencesusingtransurethralultrasoundablationtulsaasapromisingfocalapproachtotreatlocalizedprostatecanceramonocentricstudy AT hensenbennet firstexperiencesusingtransurethralultrasoundablationtulsaasapromisingfocalapproachtotreatlocalizedprostatecanceramonocentricstudy AT glandorfjulian firstexperiencesusingtransurethralultrasoundablationtulsaasapromisingfocalapproachtotreatlocalizedprostatecanceramonocentricstudy AT gutberletmarcel firstexperiencesusingtransurethralultrasoundablationtulsaasapromisingfocalapproachtotreatlocalizedprostatecanceramonocentricstudy AT dohnamartha firstexperiencesusingtransurethralultrasoundablationtulsaasapromisingfocalapproachtotreatlocalizedprostatecanceramonocentricstudy AT struckmannsteffen firstexperiencesusingtransurethralultrasoundablationtulsaasapromisingfocalapproachtotreatlocalizedprostatecanceramonocentricstudy AT kuczykmarkusantonius firstexperiencesusingtransurethralultrasoundablationtulsaasapromisingfocalapproachtotreatlocalizedprostatecanceramonocentricstudy AT wackerfrank firstexperiencesusingtransurethralultrasoundablationtulsaasapromisingfocalapproachtotreatlocalizedprostatecanceramonocentricstudy AT hellmssusanne firstexperiencesusingtransurethralultrasoundablationtulsaasapromisingfocalapproachtotreatlocalizedprostatecanceramonocentricstudy |