Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) (Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 11520) as a feed additive for horses
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) as a feed additive for horses. This additive is a preparation single strain of Lactobaci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649503 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6143 |
_version_ | 1785098518920167424 |
---|---|
author | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kos Durjava, Mojca Kouba, Maryline López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Herman, Lieve Glandorf, Boet Prieto, Miguel Maradona Saarela, Maria Brozzi, Rosella |
author_facet | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kos Durjava, Mojca Kouba, Maryline López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Herman, Lieve Glandorf, Boet Prieto, Miguel Maradona Saarela, Maria Brozzi, Rosella |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) as a feed additive for horses. This additive is a preparation single strain of Lactobacillus plantarum intended for use as a zootechnical additive in feed for horses. The identity of the bacterial strain was not established. Consequently, the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment cannot be applied, and separate studies on target animals, consumer and environmental safety are required. The tolerance trial provided could not be considered due to non‐compliance with the minimum requirements. No additional studies or data were provided for the other safety aspects. Therefore, in the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel was not in the position to conclude on the safety of ProEquo(®) for the target animals, consumers of products derived from animals fed the additive and the environment. ProEquo(®) should be considered a respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy potential of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation potential. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of ProEquo(®) for horses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10464672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104646722023-08-30 Safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) (Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 11520) as a feed additive for horses Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kos Durjava, Mojca Kouba, Maryline López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Herman, Lieve Glandorf, Boet Prieto, Miguel Maradona Saarela, Maria Brozzi, Rosella EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) as a feed additive for horses. This additive is a preparation single strain of Lactobacillus plantarum intended for use as a zootechnical additive in feed for horses. The identity of the bacterial strain was not established. Consequently, the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment cannot be applied, and separate studies on target animals, consumer and environmental safety are required. The tolerance trial provided could not be considered due to non‐compliance with the minimum requirements. No additional studies or data were provided for the other safety aspects. Therefore, in the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel was not in the position to conclude on the safety of ProEquo(®) for the target animals, consumers of products derived from animals fed the additive and the environment. ProEquo(®) should be considered a respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy potential of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation potential. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of ProEquo(®) for horses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10464672/ /pubmed/37649503 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6143 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kos Durjava, Mojca Kouba, Maryline López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Herman, Lieve Glandorf, Boet Prieto, Miguel Maradona Saarela, Maria Brozzi, Rosella Safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) (Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 11520) as a feed additive for horses |
title | Safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) (Lactobacillus plantarum
DSM 11520) as a feed additive for horses |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) (Lactobacillus plantarum
DSM 11520) as a feed additive for horses |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) (Lactobacillus plantarum
DSM 11520) as a feed additive for horses |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) (Lactobacillus plantarum
DSM 11520) as a feed additive for horses |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of ProEquo(®) (Lactobacillus plantarum
DSM 11520) as a feed additive for horses |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of proequo(®) (lactobacillus plantarum
dsm 11520) as a feed additive for horses |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649503 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT bampidisvasileios safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT azimontigiovanna safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT bastosmariadelourdes safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT christensenhenrik safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT dusemundbirgit safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT kosdurjavamojca safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT koubamaryline safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT lopezalonsomarta safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT lopezpuentesecundino safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT marconfrancesca safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT mayobaltasar safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT pechovaalena safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT petkovamariana safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT ramosfernando safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT sanzyolanda safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT villarobertoedoardo safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT woutersenruud safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT hermanlieve safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT glandorfboet safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT prietomiguelmaradona safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT saarelamaria safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses AT brozzirosella safetyandefficacyofproequolactobacillusplantarumdsm11520asafeedadditiveforhorses |