Cargando…

THE EFFECT OF AIR QUALITY ON SLEEP AND COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE IN SCHOOL CHILDREN AGED 10–12 YEARS: A DOUBLE-BLINDED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, CROSSOVER TRIAL

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of CO(2) during sleep on next-morning cognitive performance in young schoolchildren, the authors performed a double-blind fully balanced crossover placebo-controlled study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors included 36 children aged 10–12 years in the climate ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klausen, Frida Bejder, Amidi, Ali, Kjærgaard, Søren K., Schlünssen, Vivi, Ravn, Peter, Østergaard, Kirsten, Gutzke, Vibeke Heitmann, Glasius, Marianne, Grønborg, Therese Koops, Hansen, Stefan Nygaard, Zachariae, Robert, Wargocki, Pawel, Sigsgaard, Torben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36861764
http://dx.doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02032
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of CO(2) during sleep on next-morning cognitive performance in young schoolchildren, the authors performed a double-blind fully balanced crossover placebo-controlled study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors included 36 children aged 10–12 years in the climate chamber. The children slept at 21°C in 6 groups each at 3 different conditions separated by 7 days in a random order. Conditions were as follows: high ventilation with CO(2) at 700 ppm, high ventilation with added pure CO(2) at 2000–3000 ppm, and reduced ventilation with CO(2) at 2–3000 ppm and bioeffluents. Children were subjected to a digital cognitive test battery (CANTAB) in the evening prior to sleep and on the next morning after breakfast. Sleep quality was monitored with wrist actigraphs. RESULTS: There were no significant exposure effects on cognitive performance. Sleep efficiency was significantly lower at high ventilation with CO(2) at 700 ppm which is considered to be a chance effect. No other effects were seen, and no relation between air quality during sleep and next-morning cognitive performance was observed in the children emitting an estimated 10 l(CO(2))/h per child. CONCLUSIONS: No effect of CO(2) during sleep was found on next day cognition. The children were awakened in the morning, and spent from 45–70 min in well-ventilated rooms before they were tested. Hence, it cannot be precluded that the children have benefitted from the good indoor air quality conditions before and during the testing period. The slightly better sleep efficiency during high CO(2) concentrations might be a chance finding. Hence, replication is needed in actual bedrooms controlling for other external factors before any generalizations can be made.