Cargando…

ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions—A multinational prospective study (Hong Kong S.A.R., Singapore, Ireland, and the United Kingdom)

INTRODUCTION: Large language models, in particular ChatGPT, have showcased remarkable language processing capabilities. Given the substantial workload of university medical staff, this study aims to assess the quality of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) produced by ChatGPT for use in graduate medica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheung, Billy Ho Hung, Lau, Gary Kui Kai, Wong, Gordon Tin Chun, Lee, Elaine Yuen Phin, Kulkarni, Dhananjay, Seow, Choon Sheong, Wong, Ruby, Co, Michael Tiong-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37643186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290691
_version_ 1785098575163686912
author Cheung, Billy Ho Hung
Lau, Gary Kui Kai
Wong, Gordon Tin Chun
Lee, Elaine Yuen Phin
Kulkarni, Dhananjay
Seow, Choon Sheong
Wong, Ruby
Co, Michael Tiong-Hong
author_facet Cheung, Billy Ho Hung
Lau, Gary Kui Kai
Wong, Gordon Tin Chun
Lee, Elaine Yuen Phin
Kulkarni, Dhananjay
Seow, Choon Sheong
Wong, Ruby
Co, Michael Tiong-Hong
author_sort Cheung, Billy Ho Hung
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Large language models, in particular ChatGPT, have showcased remarkable language processing capabilities. Given the substantial workload of university medical staff, this study aims to assess the quality of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) produced by ChatGPT for use in graduate medical examinations, compared to questions written by university professoriate staffs based on standard medical textbooks. METHODS: 50 MCQs were generated by ChatGPT with reference to two standard undergraduate medical textbooks (Harrison’s, and Bailey & Love’s). Another 50 MCQs were drafted by two university professoriate staff using the same medical textbooks. All 100 MCQ were individually numbered, randomized and sent to five independent international assessors for MCQ quality assessment using a standardized assessment score on five assessment domains, namely, appropriateness of the question, clarity and specificity, relevance, discriminative power of alternatives, and suitability for medical graduate examination. RESULTS: The total time required for ChatGPT to create the 50 questions was 20 minutes 25 seconds, while it took two human examiners a total of 211 minutes 33 seconds to draft the 50 questions. When a comparison of the mean score was made between the questions constructed by A.I. with those drafted by humans, only in the relevance domain that the A.I. was inferior to humans (A.I.: 7.56 +/- 0.94 vs human: 7.88 +/- 0.52; p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in question quality between questions drafted by A.I. versus humans, in the total assessment score as well as in other domains. Questions generated by A.I. yielded a wider range of scores, while those created by humans were consistent and within a narrower range. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT has the potential to generate comparable-quality MCQs for medical graduate examinations within a significantly shorter time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10464959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104649592023-08-30 ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions—A multinational prospective study (Hong Kong S.A.R., Singapore, Ireland, and the United Kingdom) Cheung, Billy Ho Hung Lau, Gary Kui Kai Wong, Gordon Tin Chun Lee, Elaine Yuen Phin Kulkarni, Dhananjay Seow, Choon Sheong Wong, Ruby Co, Michael Tiong-Hong PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Large language models, in particular ChatGPT, have showcased remarkable language processing capabilities. Given the substantial workload of university medical staff, this study aims to assess the quality of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) produced by ChatGPT for use in graduate medical examinations, compared to questions written by university professoriate staffs based on standard medical textbooks. METHODS: 50 MCQs were generated by ChatGPT with reference to two standard undergraduate medical textbooks (Harrison’s, and Bailey & Love’s). Another 50 MCQs were drafted by two university professoriate staff using the same medical textbooks. All 100 MCQ were individually numbered, randomized and sent to five independent international assessors for MCQ quality assessment using a standardized assessment score on five assessment domains, namely, appropriateness of the question, clarity and specificity, relevance, discriminative power of alternatives, and suitability for medical graduate examination. RESULTS: The total time required for ChatGPT to create the 50 questions was 20 minutes 25 seconds, while it took two human examiners a total of 211 minutes 33 seconds to draft the 50 questions. When a comparison of the mean score was made between the questions constructed by A.I. with those drafted by humans, only in the relevance domain that the A.I. was inferior to humans (A.I.: 7.56 +/- 0.94 vs human: 7.88 +/- 0.52; p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in question quality between questions drafted by A.I. versus humans, in the total assessment score as well as in other domains. Questions generated by A.I. yielded a wider range of scores, while those created by humans were consistent and within a narrower range. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT has the potential to generate comparable-quality MCQs for medical graduate examinations within a significantly shorter time. Public Library of Science 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10464959/ /pubmed/37643186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290691 Text en © 2023 Cheung et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cheung, Billy Ho Hung
Lau, Gary Kui Kai
Wong, Gordon Tin Chun
Lee, Elaine Yuen Phin
Kulkarni, Dhananjay
Seow, Choon Sheong
Wong, Ruby
Co, Michael Tiong-Hong
ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions—A multinational prospective study (Hong Kong S.A.R., Singapore, Ireland, and the United Kingdom)
title ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions—A multinational prospective study (Hong Kong S.A.R., Singapore, Ireland, and the United Kingdom)
title_full ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions—A multinational prospective study (Hong Kong S.A.R., Singapore, Ireland, and the United Kingdom)
title_fullStr ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions—A multinational prospective study (Hong Kong S.A.R., Singapore, Ireland, and the United Kingdom)
title_full_unstemmed ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions—A multinational prospective study (Hong Kong S.A.R., Singapore, Ireland, and the United Kingdom)
title_short ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions—A multinational prospective study (Hong Kong S.A.R., Singapore, Ireland, and the United Kingdom)
title_sort chatgpt versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions—a multinational prospective study (hong kong s.a.r., singapore, ireland, and the united kingdom)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37643186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290691
work_keys_str_mv AT cheungbillyhohung chatgptversushumaningeneratingmedicalgraduateexammultiplechoicequestionsamultinationalprospectivestudyhongkongsarsingaporeirelandandtheunitedkingdom
AT laugarykuikai chatgptversushumaningeneratingmedicalgraduateexammultiplechoicequestionsamultinationalprospectivestudyhongkongsarsingaporeirelandandtheunitedkingdom
AT wonggordontinchun chatgptversushumaningeneratingmedicalgraduateexammultiplechoicequestionsamultinationalprospectivestudyhongkongsarsingaporeirelandandtheunitedkingdom
AT leeelaineyuenphin chatgptversushumaningeneratingmedicalgraduateexammultiplechoicequestionsamultinationalprospectivestudyhongkongsarsingaporeirelandandtheunitedkingdom
AT kulkarnidhananjay chatgptversushumaningeneratingmedicalgraduateexammultiplechoicequestionsamultinationalprospectivestudyhongkongsarsingaporeirelandandtheunitedkingdom
AT seowchoonsheong chatgptversushumaningeneratingmedicalgraduateexammultiplechoicequestionsamultinationalprospectivestudyhongkongsarsingaporeirelandandtheunitedkingdom
AT wongruby chatgptversushumaningeneratingmedicalgraduateexammultiplechoicequestionsamultinationalprospectivestudyhongkongsarsingaporeirelandandtheunitedkingdom
AT comichaeltionghong chatgptversushumaningeneratingmedicalgraduateexammultiplechoicequestionsamultinationalprospectivestudyhongkongsarsingaporeirelandandtheunitedkingdom