Cargando…
Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews
The Journal Impact Factor is often used as a proxy measure for journal quality, but the empirical evidence is scarce. In particular, it is unclear how peer review characteristics for a journal relate to its impact factor. We analysed 10,000 peer review reports submitted to 1,644 biomedical journals...
Autores principales: | Severin, Anna, Strinzel, Michaela, Egger, Matthias, Barros, Tiago, Sokolov, Alexander, Mouatt, Julia Vilstrup, Müller, Stefan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37643173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002238 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data
por: Severin, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis
por: Strinzel, Michaela, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Erratum for Strinzel et al., “Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis”
por: Strinzel, Michaela, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Correction for Strinzel et al., “Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis”
por: Strinzel, Michaela, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Thoroughness
por: Dotterer, L. P.
Publicado: (1885)