Cargando…

Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9

BACKGROUND: Case finding for low mood is essential in primary care, but it is time-consuming using current depression inventories. The Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) is a short, simple inventory which assesses mood for today, and we aimed to validate it in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthew, Carolyn, Dahle, Nina, Roskvist, Rachel, Moir, Fiona, Arroll, Bruce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649750
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_9_23
_version_ 1785098589280665600
author Matthew, Carolyn
Dahle, Nina
Roskvist, Rachel
Moir, Fiona
Arroll, Bruce
author_facet Matthew, Carolyn
Dahle, Nina
Roskvist, Rachel
Moir, Fiona
Arroll, Bruce
author_sort Matthew, Carolyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Case finding for low mood is essential in primary care, but it is time-consuming using current depression inventories. The Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) is a short, simple inventory which assesses mood for today, and we aimed to validate it in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with emotional distress seen in a single primary care clinic by one of the authors over 22 months were eligible for this retrospective audit (N = 160). Multiple visits (N = 421) from the same patient were included in the study. The index test was BDST, which assesses the patient’s mood for today. The reference standard was the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which assesses mood over the past 2 weeks. PHQ-9 had a cut-off point of ≥10 and BDST had a cut-off point of ≥6 for a significant mood issue. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 35 years, and 63% of the cohort were women. The median BDST score was 8, indicative of moderately low mood, and the median PHQ-9 score was 15, indicative of moderately severe depression. For patients with a BDST score ≥6, the likelihood ratio of a positive test was 2.67. The sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%–96%) and the specificity was 68% (95% CI: 60%–76%). The area under the curve was 84% (95% CI: 80%–87%). CONCLUSION: This audit validates BDST against PHQ-9 and finds it an excellent case-finding tool compared to PHQ-9. This is the first validation study of BDST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10465026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104650262023-08-30 Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9 Matthew, Carolyn Dahle, Nina Roskvist, Rachel Moir, Fiona Arroll, Bruce J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Case finding for low mood is essential in primary care, but it is time-consuming using current depression inventories. The Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) is a short, simple inventory which assesses mood for today, and we aimed to validate it in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with emotional distress seen in a single primary care clinic by one of the authors over 22 months were eligible for this retrospective audit (N = 160). Multiple visits (N = 421) from the same patient were included in the study. The index test was BDST, which assesses the patient’s mood for today. The reference standard was the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which assesses mood over the past 2 weeks. PHQ-9 had a cut-off point of ≥10 and BDST had a cut-off point of ≥6 for a significant mood issue. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 35 years, and 63% of the cohort were women. The median BDST score was 8, indicative of moderately low mood, and the median PHQ-9 score was 15, indicative of moderately severe depression. For patients with a BDST score ≥6, the likelihood ratio of a positive test was 2.67. The sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%–96%) and the specificity was 68% (95% CI: 60%–76%). The area under the curve was 84% (95% CI: 80%–87%). CONCLUSION: This audit validates BDST against PHQ-9 and finds it an excellent case-finding tool compared to PHQ-9. This is the first validation study of BDST. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10465026/ /pubmed/37649750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_9_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Matthew, Carolyn
Dahle, Nina
Roskvist, Rachel
Moir, Fiona
Arroll, Bruce
Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9
title Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9
title_full Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9
title_fullStr Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9
title_full_unstemmed Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9
title_short Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9
title_sort burns depression scale today (bdst): a validation study of bdst against the reference standard of phq-9
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649750
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_9_23
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewcarolyn burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9
AT dahlenina burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9
AT roskvistrachel burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9
AT moirfiona burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9
AT arrollbruce burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9