Cargando…
Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9
BACKGROUND: Case finding for low mood is essential in primary care, but it is time-consuming using current depression inventories. The Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) is a short, simple inventory which assesses mood for today, and we aimed to validate it in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Con...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_9_23 |
_version_ | 1785098589280665600 |
---|---|
author | Matthew, Carolyn Dahle, Nina Roskvist, Rachel Moir, Fiona Arroll, Bruce |
author_facet | Matthew, Carolyn Dahle, Nina Roskvist, Rachel Moir, Fiona Arroll, Bruce |
author_sort | Matthew, Carolyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Case finding for low mood is essential in primary care, but it is time-consuming using current depression inventories. The Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) is a short, simple inventory which assesses mood for today, and we aimed to validate it in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with emotional distress seen in a single primary care clinic by one of the authors over 22 months were eligible for this retrospective audit (N = 160). Multiple visits (N = 421) from the same patient were included in the study. The index test was BDST, which assesses the patient’s mood for today. The reference standard was the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which assesses mood over the past 2 weeks. PHQ-9 had a cut-off point of ≥10 and BDST had a cut-off point of ≥6 for a significant mood issue. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 35 years, and 63% of the cohort were women. The median BDST score was 8, indicative of moderately low mood, and the median PHQ-9 score was 15, indicative of moderately severe depression. For patients with a BDST score ≥6, the likelihood ratio of a positive test was 2.67. The sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%–96%) and the specificity was 68% (95% CI: 60%–76%). The area under the curve was 84% (95% CI: 80%–87%). CONCLUSION: This audit validates BDST against PHQ-9 and finds it an excellent case-finding tool compared to PHQ-9. This is the first validation study of BDST. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10465026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104650262023-08-30 Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9 Matthew, Carolyn Dahle, Nina Roskvist, Rachel Moir, Fiona Arroll, Bruce J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Case finding for low mood is essential in primary care, but it is time-consuming using current depression inventories. The Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) is a short, simple inventory which assesses mood for today, and we aimed to validate it in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with emotional distress seen in a single primary care clinic by one of the authors over 22 months were eligible for this retrospective audit (N = 160). Multiple visits (N = 421) from the same patient were included in the study. The index test was BDST, which assesses the patient’s mood for today. The reference standard was the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which assesses mood over the past 2 weeks. PHQ-9 had a cut-off point of ≥10 and BDST had a cut-off point of ≥6 for a significant mood issue. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 35 years, and 63% of the cohort were women. The median BDST score was 8, indicative of moderately low mood, and the median PHQ-9 score was 15, indicative of moderately severe depression. For patients with a BDST score ≥6, the likelihood ratio of a positive test was 2.67. The sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%–96%) and the specificity was 68% (95% CI: 60%–76%). The area under the curve was 84% (95% CI: 80%–87%). CONCLUSION: This audit validates BDST against PHQ-9 and finds it an excellent case-finding tool compared to PHQ-9. This is the first validation study of BDST. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10465026/ /pubmed/37649750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_9_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Matthew, Carolyn Dahle, Nina Roskvist, Rachel Moir, Fiona Arroll, Bruce Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9 |
title | Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9 |
title_full | Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9 |
title_fullStr | Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9 |
title_full_unstemmed | Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9 |
title_short | Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9 |
title_sort | burns depression scale today (bdst): a validation study of bdst against the reference standard of phq-9 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_9_23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matthewcarolyn burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9 AT dahlenina burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9 AT roskvistrachel burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9 AT moirfiona burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9 AT arrollbruce burnsdepressionscaletodaybdstavalidationstudyofbdstagainstthereferencestandardofphq9 |