Influences of dynamic load phase shifts on the energetics and biomechanics of humans

Using load-suspended backpacks to reduce vertical peak dynamic load exerted on humans can reduce metabolic costs. However, is it possible to further reduce metabolic cost by modulating dynamic load phase shift? If so, is anti-phase better than the others? In this study, we investigated the biomechanics, energetics and trunk response under phase shifts. Nine subjects wearing an active backpack with 19.4 kg loads walked on a treadmill at 5 km h(−1) with four phase shift trials (T1–T4) and a load-locked trial (LK). Our results show that anti-phase trial (T3) assists ankle more and reduces the moment and gastrocnemius medialis activity, while T4 assists knee more and reduces the moment and rectus femoris activity. Due to the load injecting more mechanical energy into human in T3 and T4, the positive centre-of-mass work is significantly reduced. However, the gross metabolic rate is lowest in T4 and 4.43% lower than in T2, which may be because the activations of erector spinae and gluteus maximus are reduced in T4. In addition, T3 increases trunk extensor effort, which may weaken the metabolic advantage. This study provides guidance for improving assistance strategies and human–load interfaces and deepens the understanding of the energetics and biomechanics of human loaded walking.