Cargando…
Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Purpose: Recent studies suggest that (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG in GC, some evidence is pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649615 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.88335 |
_version_ | 1785098624099680256 |
---|---|
author | Ruan, Dan Zhao, Liang Cai, Jiayu Xu, Weizhi Sun, Long Li, Jiayi Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Xiaoyuan Chen, Haojun |
author_facet | Ruan, Dan Zhao, Liang Cai, Jiayu Xu, Weizhi Sun, Long Li, Jiayi Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Xiaoyuan Chen, Haojun |
author_sort | Ruan, Dan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Recent studies suggest that (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG in GC, some evidence is provided to foster the broader clinical application of FAPI PET imaging. Methods: In this review, studies published up to July 3, 2023, that employed radionuclide labelled FAPI as a diagnostic radiotracer for PET in GC were analysed. These studies were sourced from both the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Our statistical analysis involved a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative metrics. These were performed using R language. Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies, with 527 patients, of which 358 were diagnosed with GC. Overall, (68)Ga-FAPI showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.84 [95% CI 0.67-0.94] vs. 0.46 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]), specificity (0.91 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] vs. 0.88 [95% CI 0.74-0.96]) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.92 [95% CI 0.77-0.98] vs. 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.86]) than (18)F-FDG. The evidence showed superior pooled sensitivities of (68)Ga-FAPI PET over (18)F-FDG for primary tumours, local recurrence, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Furthermore, (68)Ga-FAPI PET provided higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR). For bone metastases, while (68)Ga-FAPI PET demonstrated slightly lower patient-based pooled sensitivity (0.93 vs. 1.00), it significantly outperformed (18)F-FDG in the lesion-based analysis (0.95 vs. 0.65). However, SUVmax (mean difference [MD] 1.79 [95% CI -3.87-7.45]) and TBR (MD 5.01 [95% CI -0.78-10.80]) of bone metastases showed no significant difference between (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Compared with (18)F-FDG, (68)Ga-FAPI PET imaging showed improved diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of GC. It can be effectively applied to the early diagnosis, initial staging, and detection of recurrence/metastases of GC. (68)Ga-FAPI may have the potential of replacing (18)F-FDG in GC in future applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10465231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104652312023-08-30 Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ruan, Dan Zhao, Liang Cai, Jiayu Xu, Weizhi Sun, Long Li, Jiayi Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Xiaoyuan Chen, Haojun Theranostics Research Paper Purpose: Recent studies suggest that (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG in GC, some evidence is provided to foster the broader clinical application of FAPI PET imaging. Methods: In this review, studies published up to July 3, 2023, that employed radionuclide labelled FAPI as a diagnostic radiotracer for PET in GC were analysed. These studies were sourced from both the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Our statistical analysis involved a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative metrics. These were performed using R language. Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies, with 527 patients, of which 358 were diagnosed with GC. Overall, (68)Ga-FAPI showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.84 [95% CI 0.67-0.94] vs. 0.46 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]), specificity (0.91 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] vs. 0.88 [95% CI 0.74-0.96]) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.92 [95% CI 0.77-0.98] vs. 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.86]) than (18)F-FDG. The evidence showed superior pooled sensitivities of (68)Ga-FAPI PET over (18)F-FDG for primary tumours, local recurrence, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Furthermore, (68)Ga-FAPI PET provided higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR). For bone metastases, while (68)Ga-FAPI PET demonstrated slightly lower patient-based pooled sensitivity (0.93 vs. 1.00), it significantly outperformed (18)F-FDG in the lesion-based analysis (0.95 vs. 0.65). However, SUVmax (mean difference [MD] 1.79 [95% CI -3.87-7.45]) and TBR (MD 5.01 [95% CI -0.78-10.80]) of bone metastases showed no significant difference between (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Compared with (18)F-FDG, (68)Ga-FAPI PET imaging showed improved diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of GC. It can be effectively applied to the early diagnosis, initial staging, and detection of recurrence/metastases of GC. (68)Ga-FAPI may have the potential of replacing (18)F-FDG in GC in future applications. Ivyspring International Publisher 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10465231/ /pubmed/37649615 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.88335 Text en © The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Ruan, Dan Zhao, Liang Cai, Jiayu Xu, Weizhi Sun, Long Li, Jiayi Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Xiaoyuan Chen, Haojun Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of fapi pet imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649615 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.88335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruandan evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaoliang evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caijiayu evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuweizhi evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunlong evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijiayi evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangjingjing evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenxiaoyuan evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenhaojun evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |