Cargando…

Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: Recent studies suggest that (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG in GC, some evidence is pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruan, Dan, Zhao, Liang, Cai, Jiayu, Xu, Weizhi, Sun, Long, Li, Jiayi, Zhang, Jingjing, Chen, Xiaoyuan, Chen, Haojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649615
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.88335
_version_ 1785098624099680256
author Ruan, Dan
Zhao, Liang
Cai, Jiayu
Xu, Weizhi
Sun, Long
Li, Jiayi
Zhang, Jingjing
Chen, Xiaoyuan
Chen, Haojun
author_facet Ruan, Dan
Zhao, Liang
Cai, Jiayu
Xu, Weizhi
Sun, Long
Li, Jiayi
Zhang, Jingjing
Chen, Xiaoyuan
Chen, Haojun
author_sort Ruan, Dan
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Recent studies suggest that (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG in GC, some evidence is provided to foster the broader clinical application of FAPI PET imaging. Methods: In this review, studies published up to July 3, 2023, that employed radionuclide labelled FAPI as a diagnostic radiotracer for PET in GC were analysed. These studies were sourced from both the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Our statistical analysis involved a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative metrics. These were performed using R language. Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies, with 527 patients, of which 358 were diagnosed with GC. Overall, (68)Ga-FAPI showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.84 [95% CI 0.67-0.94] vs. 0.46 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]), specificity (0.91 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] vs. 0.88 [95% CI 0.74-0.96]) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.92 [95% CI 0.77-0.98] vs. 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.86]) than (18)F-FDG. The evidence showed superior pooled sensitivities of (68)Ga-FAPI PET over (18)F-FDG for primary tumours, local recurrence, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Furthermore, (68)Ga-FAPI PET provided higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR). For bone metastases, while (68)Ga-FAPI PET demonstrated slightly lower patient-based pooled sensitivity (0.93 vs. 1.00), it significantly outperformed (18)F-FDG in the lesion-based analysis (0.95 vs. 0.65). However, SUVmax (mean difference [MD] 1.79 [95% CI -3.87-7.45]) and TBR (MD 5.01 [95% CI -0.78-10.80]) of bone metastases showed no significant difference between (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Compared with (18)F-FDG, (68)Ga-FAPI PET imaging showed improved diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of GC. It can be effectively applied to the early diagnosis, initial staging, and detection of recurrence/metastases of GC. (68)Ga-FAPI may have the potential of replacing (18)F-FDG in GC in future applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10465231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104652312023-08-30 Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ruan, Dan Zhao, Liang Cai, Jiayu Xu, Weizhi Sun, Long Li, Jiayi Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Xiaoyuan Chen, Haojun Theranostics Research Paper Purpose: Recent studies suggest that (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG in GC, some evidence is provided to foster the broader clinical application of FAPI PET imaging. Methods: In this review, studies published up to July 3, 2023, that employed radionuclide labelled FAPI as a diagnostic radiotracer for PET in GC were analysed. These studies were sourced from both the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Our statistical analysis involved a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative metrics. These were performed using R language. Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies, with 527 patients, of which 358 were diagnosed with GC. Overall, (68)Ga-FAPI showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.84 [95% CI 0.67-0.94] vs. 0.46 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]), specificity (0.91 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] vs. 0.88 [95% CI 0.74-0.96]) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.92 [95% CI 0.77-0.98] vs. 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.86]) than (18)F-FDG. The evidence showed superior pooled sensitivities of (68)Ga-FAPI PET over (18)F-FDG for primary tumours, local recurrence, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Furthermore, (68)Ga-FAPI PET provided higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR). For bone metastases, while (68)Ga-FAPI PET demonstrated slightly lower patient-based pooled sensitivity (0.93 vs. 1.00), it significantly outperformed (18)F-FDG in the lesion-based analysis (0.95 vs. 0.65). However, SUVmax (mean difference [MD] 1.79 [95% CI -3.87-7.45]) and TBR (MD 5.01 [95% CI -0.78-10.80]) of bone metastases showed no significant difference between (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Compared with (18)F-FDG, (68)Ga-FAPI PET imaging showed improved diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of GC. It can be effectively applied to the early diagnosis, initial staging, and detection of recurrence/metastases of GC. (68)Ga-FAPI may have the potential of replacing (18)F-FDG in GC in future applications. Ivyspring International Publisher 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10465231/ /pubmed/37649615 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.88335 Text en © The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Ruan, Dan
Zhao, Liang
Cai, Jiayu
Xu, Weizhi
Sun, Long
Li, Jiayi
Zhang, Jingjing
Chen, Xiaoyuan
Chen, Haojun
Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort evaluation of fapi pet imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649615
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.88335
work_keys_str_mv AT ruandan evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoliang evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caijiayu evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuweizhi evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunlong evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijiayi evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjingjing evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenxiaoyuan evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenhaojun evaluationoffapipetimagingingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis