Cargando…
Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned
New technologies and disruptions related to Coronavirus disease-2019 have led to expansion of decentralized approaches to clinical trials. Remote tools and methods hold promise for increasing trial efficiency and reducing burdens and barriers by facilitating participation outside of traditional clin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37654775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.597 |
_version_ | 1785098646401843200 |
---|---|
author | Hanley, Daniel F. Bernard, Gordon R. Wilkins, Consuelo H. Selker, Harry P. Dwyer, Jamie P. Dean, J. Michael Benjamin, Daniel Kelly Dunsmore, Sarah E. Waddy, Salina P. Wiley, Kenneth L. Palm, Marisha E. Mould, W. Andrew Ford, Daniel F. Burr, Jeri S. Huvane, Jacqueline Lane, Karen Poole, Lori Edwards, Terri L. Kennedy, Nan Boone, Leslie R. Bell, Jasmine Serdoz, Emily Byrne, Loretta M. Harris, Paul A. |
author_facet | Hanley, Daniel F. Bernard, Gordon R. Wilkins, Consuelo H. Selker, Harry P. Dwyer, Jamie P. Dean, J. Michael Benjamin, Daniel Kelly Dunsmore, Sarah E. Waddy, Salina P. Wiley, Kenneth L. Palm, Marisha E. Mould, W. Andrew Ford, Daniel F. Burr, Jeri S. Huvane, Jacqueline Lane, Karen Poole, Lori Edwards, Terri L. Kennedy, Nan Boone, Leslie R. Bell, Jasmine Serdoz, Emily Byrne, Loretta M. Harris, Paul A. |
author_sort | Hanley, Daniel F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | New technologies and disruptions related to Coronavirus disease-2019 have led to expansion of decentralized approaches to clinical trials. Remote tools and methods hold promise for increasing trial efficiency and reducing burdens and barriers by facilitating participation outside of traditional clinical settings and taking studies directly to participants. The Trial Innovation Network, established in 2016 by the National Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Science to address critical roadblocks in clinical research and accelerate the translational research process, has consulted on over 400 research study proposals to date. Its recommendations for decentralized approaches have included eConsent, participant-informed study design, remote intervention, study task reminders, social media recruitment, and return of results for participants. Some clinical trial elements have worked well when decentralized, while others, including remote recruitment and patient monitoring, need further refinement and assessment to determine their value. Partially decentralized, or “hybrid” trials, offer a first step to optimizing remote methods. Decentralized processes demonstrate potential to improve urban-rural diversity, but their impact on inclusion of racially and ethnically marginalized populations requires further study. To optimize inclusive participation in decentralized clinical trials, efforts must be made to build trust among marginalized communities, and to ensure access to remote technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10465321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104653212023-08-31 Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned Hanley, Daniel F. Bernard, Gordon R. Wilkins, Consuelo H. Selker, Harry P. Dwyer, Jamie P. Dean, J. Michael Benjamin, Daniel Kelly Dunsmore, Sarah E. Waddy, Salina P. Wiley, Kenneth L. Palm, Marisha E. Mould, W. Andrew Ford, Daniel F. Burr, Jeri S. Huvane, Jacqueline Lane, Karen Poole, Lori Edwards, Terri L. Kennedy, Nan Boone, Leslie R. Bell, Jasmine Serdoz, Emily Byrne, Loretta M. Harris, Paul A. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications New technologies and disruptions related to Coronavirus disease-2019 have led to expansion of decentralized approaches to clinical trials. Remote tools and methods hold promise for increasing trial efficiency and reducing burdens and barriers by facilitating participation outside of traditional clinical settings and taking studies directly to participants. The Trial Innovation Network, established in 2016 by the National Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Science to address critical roadblocks in clinical research and accelerate the translational research process, has consulted on over 400 research study proposals to date. Its recommendations for decentralized approaches have included eConsent, participant-informed study design, remote intervention, study task reminders, social media recruitment, and return of results for participants. Some clinical trial elements have worked well when decentralized, while others, including remote recruitment and patient monitoring, need further refinement and assessment to determine their value. Partially decentralized, or “hybrid” trials, offer a first step to optimizing remote methods. Decentralized processes demonstrate potential to improve urban-rural diversity, but their impact on inclusion of racially and ethnically marginalized populations requires further study. To optimize inclusive participation in decentralized clinical trials, efforts must be made to build trust among marginalized communities, and to ensure access to remote technology. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10465321/ /pubmed/37654775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.597 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Communications Hanley, Daniel F. Bernard, Gordon R. Wilkins, Consuelo H. Selker, Harry P. Dwyer, Jamie P. Dean, J. Michael Benjamin, Daniel Kelly Dunsmore, Sarah E. Waddy, Salina P. Wiley, Kenneth L. Palm, Marisha E. Mould, W. Andrew Ford, Daniel F. Burr, Jeri S. Huvane, Jacqueline Lane, Karen Poole, Lori Edwards, Terri L. Kennedy, Nan Boone, Leslie R. Bell, Jasmine Serdoz, Emily Byrne, Loretta M. Harris, Paul A. Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned |
title | Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned |
title_full | Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned |
title_fullStr | Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned |
title_full_unstemmed | Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned |
title_short | Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned |
title_sort | decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: value, strategies, and lessons learned |
topic | Special Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37654775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanleydanielf decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT bernardgordonr decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT wilkinsconsueloh decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT selkerharryp decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT dwyerjamiep decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT deanjmichael decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT benjamindanielkelly decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT dunsmoresarahe decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT waddysalinap decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT wileykennethl decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT palmmarishae decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT mouldwandrew decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT forddanielf decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT burrjeris decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT huvanejacqueline decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT lanekaren decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT poolelori decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT edwardsterril decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT kennedynan decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT booneleslier decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT belljasmine decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT serdozemily decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT byrnelorettam decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned AT harrispaula decentralizedclinicaltrialsinthetrialinnovationnetworkvaluestrategiesandlessonslearned |