Cargando…

Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate European entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for sub-specialised hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal (HB/GI) diagnostic imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both European Society of Radiology and national curricula in HB/GI diagnostic radiology were thoroughly re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paisant, Anita, Skehan, Stephen, Colombié, Mathilde, David, Arthur, Aubé, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01482-x
_version_ 1785098669260800000
author Paisant, Anita
Skehan, Stephen
Colombié, Mathilde
David, Arthur
Aubé, Christophe
author_facet Paisant, Anita
Skehan, Stephen
Colombié, Mathilde
David, Arthur
Aubé, Christophe
author_sort Paisant, Anita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate European entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for sub-specialised hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal (HB/GI) diagnostic imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both European Society of Radiology and national curricula in HB/GI diagnostic radiology were thoroughly reviewed, resulting in preliminary EPAs drafted by a pilot group of expert radiologists in 2 different countries. Each EPA was fully described with 7 components (Specification/limitations; Potential risks of failing; Relevant domains of competence; Required experience, knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; Assessment information sources to assess progress and ground a summative entrustment decision; Entrustment for which level of supervision is to be reached; and Expiration date). The modified Delphi method with 3 Delphi rounds was chosen for validation. Content validity index (CVI) and median values were used for validation. RESULTS: There were 15 preliminary EPAs, some of them divided according to 2 levels: resident and fellow level. The 37 members of the Delphi group were based in 2 different European countries with a background experience of 10 represented countries. Subsequent to the first Delphi round, 6 EPAs were accepted (CVI ≥ 0.8, median ≥ 4), 6 needed major revisions (CVI 0.7–0.79, median ≥ 4), 3 were rejected (CVI < 0.7) and 1 was added. After the second Delphi round, both the 6 revised EPAs and the additional one met the validation criteria (CVI ≥ 0.8, median ≥ 4). Finally, 13 EPAs were validated during the 3(rd) Delphi round with an agreement percentage of 95–100%. CONCLUSION: This study creates and validates EPAs for sub-specialised HB/GI diagnostic imaging. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Thirteen EPAs for sub-specialised hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal diagnostic imaging were created with a strong methodology, and as a first example set in sub-specialised diagnostic imaging, they provide a template for others to be created. KEY POINTS: • The competence-based teaching in medical studies has recently been reintroduced through EPAs. • Thirteen EPAs have been developed for hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal sub-specialised diagnostic imaging. • These EPAs were validated using a Delphi modified method and provide a template for other to be created. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01482-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10465426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104654262023-08-31 Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology Paisant, Anita Skehan, Stephen Colombié, Mathilde David, Arthur Aubé, Christophe Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate European entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for sub-specialised hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal (HB/GI) diagnostic imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both European Society of Radiology and national curricula in HB/GI diagnostic radiology were thoroughly reviewed, resulting in preliminary EPAs drafted by a pilot group of expert radiologists in 2 different countries. Each EPA was fully described with 7 components (Specification/limitations; Potential risks of failing; Relevant domains of competence; Required experience, knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; Assessment information sources to assess progress and ground a summative entrustment decision; Entrustment for which level of supervision is to be reached; and Expiration date). The modified Delphi method with 3 Delphi rounds was chosen for validation. Content validity index (CVI) and median values were used for validation. RESULTS: There were 15 preliminary EPAs, some of them divided according to 2 levels: resident and fellow level. The 37 members of the Delphi group were based in 2 different European countries with a background experience of 10 represented countries. Subsequent to the first Delphi round, 6 EPAs were accepted (CVI ≥ 0.8, median ≥ 4), 6 needed major revisions (CVI 0.7–0.79, median ≥ 4), 3 were rejected (CVI < 0.7) and 1 was added. After the second Delphi round, both the 6 revised EPAs and the additional one met the validation criteria (CVI ≥ 0.8, median ≥ 4). Finally, 13 EPAs were validated during the 3(rd) Delphi round with an agreement percentage of 95–100%. CONCLUSION: This study creates and validates EPAs for sub-specialised HB/GI diagnostic imaging. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Thirteen EPAs for sub-specialised hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal diagnostic imaging were created with a strong methodology, and as a first example set in sub-specialised diagnostic imaging, they provide a template for others to be created. KEY POINTS: • The competence-based teaching in medical studies has recently been reintroduced through EPAs. • Thirteen EPAs have been developed for hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal sub-specialised diagnostic imaging. • These EPAs were validated using a Delphi modified method and provide a template for other to be created. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01482-x. Springer Vienna 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10465426/ /pubmed/37644337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01482-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Paisant, Anita
Skehan, Stephen
Colombié, Mathilde
David, Arthur
Aubé, Christophe
Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology
title Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology
title_full Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology
title_fullStr Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology
title_short Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology
title_sort development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01482-x
work_keys_str_mv AT paisantanita developmentandvalidationofcoreentrustableprofessionalactivitiesforabdominalradiology
AT skehanstephen developmentandvalidationofcoreentrustableprofessionalactivitiesforabdominalradiology
AT colombiemathilde developmentandvalidationofcoreentrustableprofessionalactivitiesforabdominalradiology
AT davidarthur developmentandvalidationofcoreentrustableprofessionalactivitiesforabdominalradiology
AT aubechristophe developmentandvalidationofcoreentrustableprofessionalactivitiesforabdominalradiology