Cargando…

Impact of positive microscopic resection margins (R1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse-type gastric cancer (DTGC) is associated with poor outcome. Surgical resection margin status (R) is an important prognostic factor, but its exact impact on DTGC patients remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of microscopically positive margin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaspar-Figueiredo, Sérgio, Allemann, Pierre, Borgstein, Alexander B. J., Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain, Luzuy-Guarnero, Valentine, Brunel, Christophe, Sempoux, Christine, Gisbertz, Suzanne Sarah, Demartines, Nicolas, van Berge Henegouwen, Mark Ivo, Schäfer, Markus, Mantziari, Styliani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04981-y
_version_ 1785098709428600832
author Gaspar-Figueiredo, Sérgio
Allemann, Pierre
Borgstein, Alexander B. J.
Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain
Luzuy-Guarnero, Valentine
Brunel, Christophe
Sempoux, Christine
Gisbertz, Suzanne Sarah
Demartines, Nicolas
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark Ivo
Schäfer, Markus
Mantziari, Styliani
author_facet Gaspar-Figueiredo, Sérgio
Allemann, Pierre
Borgstein, Alexander B. J.
Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain
Luzuy-Guarnero, Valentine
Brunel, Christophe
Sempoux, Christine
Gisbertz, Suzanne Sarah
Demartines, Nicolas
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark Ivo
Schäfer, Markus
Mantziari, Styliani
author_sort Gaspar-Figueiredo, Sérgio
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diffuse-type gastric cancer (DTGC) is associated with poor outcome. Surgical resection margin status (R) is an important prognostic factor, but its exact impact on DTGC patients remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of microscopically positive margins (R1) after gastrectomy on survival and tumour recurrence in DTGC patients. METHODS: All consecutive DTGC patients from two tertiary centers who underwent curative oncologic gastrectomy from 2005 to 2018 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) for R0 versus R1 patients. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence patterns as well as the overall survival benefit of chemotherapy in this DTGC patient cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 108 patients were analysed, 88 with R0 and 20 with R1 resection. Patients with negative lymph nodes and negative margins (pN0R0) had the best OS (median 102 months, 95% CI 1–207), whereas pN + R0 patients had better median OS than pN + R1 patients (36 months 95% CI 13–59, versus 7 months, 95% CI 1–13, p < 0.001). Similar findings were observed for DFS. Perioperative chemotherapy offered a median OS of 46 months (95% CI 24–68) versus 9 months (95% CI 1–25) after upfront surgery (p = 0.022). R1 patients presented more often early recurrence (< 12 postoperative months, 30% vs 8%, p = 0.002), however, no differences were observed in recurrence location. CONCLUSION: DTGC patients with microscopically positive margins (R1) presented poorer OS and DFS, and early tumour recurrence in the present series. R0 resection should be obtained whenever possible, even if other adverse biological features are present.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10465620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104656202023-08-31 Impact of positive microscopic resection margins (R1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer Gaspar-Figueiredo, Sérgio Allemann, Pierre Borgstein, Alexander B. J. Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain Luzuy-Guarnero, Valentine Brunel, Christophe Sempoux, Christine Gisbertz, Suzanne Sarah Demartines, Nicolas van Berge Henegouwen, Mark Ivo Schäfer, Markus Mantziari, Styliani J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research INTRODUCTION: Diffuse-type gastric cancer (DTGC) is associated with poor outcome. Surgical resection margin status (R) is an important prognostic factor, but its exact impact on DTGC patients remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of microscopically positive margins (R1) after gastrectomy on survival and tumour recurrence in DTGC patients. METHODS: All consecutive DTGC patients from two tertiary centers who underwent curative oncologic gastrectomy from 2005 to 2018 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) for R0 versus R1 patients. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence patterns as well as the overall survival benefit of chemotherapy in this DTGC patient cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 108 patients were analysed, 88 with R0 and 20 with R1 resection. Patients with negative lymph nodes and negative margins (pN0R0) had the best OS (median 102 months, 95% CI 1–207), whereas pN + R0 patients had better median OS than pN + R1 patients (36 months 95% CI 13–59, versus 7 months, 95% CI 1–13, p < 0.001). Similar findings were observed for DFS. Perioperative chemotherapy offered a median OS of 46 months (95% CI 24–68) versus 9 months (95% CI 1–25) after upfront surgery (p = 0.022). R1 patients presented more often early recurrence (< 12 postoperative months, 30% vs 8%, p = 0.002), however, no differences were observed in recurrence location. CONCLUSION: DTGC patients with microscopically positive margins (R1) presented poorer OS and DFS, and early tumour recurrence in the present series. R0 resection should be obtained whenever possible, even if other adverse biological features are present. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10465620/ /pubmed/37344606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04981-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Gaspar-Figueiredo, Sérgio
Allemann, Pierre
Borgstein, Alexander B. J.
Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain
Luzuy-Guarnero, Valentine
Brunel, Christophe
Sempoux, Christine
Gisbertz, Suzanne Sarah
Demartines, Nicolas
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark Ivo
Schäfer, Markus
Mantziari, Styliani
Impact of positive microscopic resection margins (R1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer
title Impact of positive microscopic resection margins (R1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer
title_full Impact of positive microscopic resection margins (R1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer
title_fullStr Impact of positive microscopic resection margins (R1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of positive microscopic resection margins (R1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer
title_short Impact of positive microscopic resection margins (R1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer
title_sort impact of positive microscopic resection margins (r1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04981-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gasparfigueiredosergio impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT allemannpierre impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT borgsteinalexanderbj impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT joliatgaetanromain impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT luzuyguarnerovalentine impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT brunelchristophe impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT sempouxchristine impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT gisbertzsuzannesarah impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT demartinesnicolas impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT vanbergehenegouwenmarkivo impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT schafermarkus impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer
AT mantziaristyliani impactofpositivemicroscopicresectionmarginsr1aftergastrectomyindiffusetypegastriccancer