Cargando…

Safety and efficiency of repeat salvage lymph node dissection for recurrence of prostate cancer using PSMA-radioguided surgery (RGS) after prior salvage lymph node dissection with or without initial RGS support

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Metastasis-directed therapy is a feasible option for low PSA, recurrent locoregional metastatic prostate cancer. After initial salvage surgery, patients with good response might consider a repeat salvage surgery in case of recurrent, isolated, and PSMA-positive metastases....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falkenbach, Fabian, Knipper, Sophie, Koehler, Daniel, Ambrosini, Francesca, Steuber, Thomas, Graefen, Markus, Budäus, Lars, Eiber, Matthias, Lunger, Lukas, Lischewski, Flemming, Heck, Matthias M., Maurer, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37515651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04534-5
_version_ 1785098715856371712
author Falkenbach, Fabian
Knipper, Sophie
Koehler, Daniel
Ambrosini, Francesca
Steuber, Thomas
Graefen, Markus
Budäus, Lars
Eiber, Matthias
Lunger, Lukas
Lischewski, Flemming
Heck, Matthias M.
Maurer, Tobias
author_facet Falkenbach, Fabian
Knipper, Sophie
Koehler, Daniel
Ambrosini, Francesca
Steuber, Thomas
Graefen, Markus
Budäus, Lars
Eiber, Matthias
Lunger, Lukas
Lischewski, Flemming
Heck, Matthias M.
Maurer, Tobias
author_sort Falkenbach, Fabian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Metastasis-directed therapy is a feasible option for low PSA, recurrent locoregional metastatic prostate cancer. After initial salvage surgery, patients with good response might consider a repeat salvage surgery in case of recurrent, isolated, and PSMA-positive metastases. This analysis aimed to evaluate the oncological outcome and safety of repeat PSMA-targeted radioguided surgery (RGS) after either prior RGS or “standard” salvage lymph node dissection (SLND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 37 patients undergoing repeat RGS after prior SLND (n = 21) (SLND-RGS) or prior RGS (n = 16) (RGS-RGS) between 2014 and 2021 after initial radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic radiation therapy at two German tertiary referral centers. Kaplan–Meier analyses and uni-/multivariable Cox regression models were used to investigate factors associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and treatment-free survival (TFS) after repeat salvage surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Complete Biochemical Response (cBR, PSA < 0.2 ng/ml) was observed in 20/32 patients (5 NA). Median overall BRFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] after repeat salvage surgery was 10.8 months (mo) (5.3–22). On multivariable regression, only age (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.17) and preoperative PSA (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01–1.50) were associated with shorter BRFS, although PSA (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99–1.36) did not achieve significant predictor status in univariable analysis before (p value = 0.07). Overall, one year after second salvage surgery, 89% of the patients (number at risk: 19) did not receive additional treatment and median TFS was not reached. Clavien–Dindo grade > 3a complications were observed in 8% (3/37 patients). Limitations are the retrospective evaluation, heterogeneous SLND procedures, lack of long-term follow-up data, and small cohort size. CONCLUSION: In this study, repeat RGS was safe and provided clinically meaningful biochemical recurrence- and treatment-free intervals for selected cases. Patients having low preoperative PSA seemed to benefit most of repeat RGS, irrespective of prior SLND or RGS or the time from initial RP/first salvage surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04534-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10465644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104656442023-08-31 Safety and efficiency of repeat salvage lymph node dissection for recurrence of prostate cancer using PSMA-radioguided surgery (RGS) after prior salvage lymph node dissection with or without initial RGS support Falkenbach, Fabian Knipper, Sophie Koehler, Daniel Ambrosini, Francesca Steuber, Thomas Graefen, Markus Budäus, Lars Eiber, Matthias Lunger, Lukas Lischewski, Flemming Heck, Matthias M. Maurer, Tobias World J Urol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Metastasis-directed therapy is a feasible option for low PSA, recurrent locoregional metastatic prostate cancer. After initial salvage surgery, patients with good response might consider a repeat salvage surgery in case of recurrent, isolated, and PSMA-positive metastases. This analysis aimed to evaluate the oncological outcome and safety of repeat PSMA-targeted radioguided surgery (RGS) after either prior RGS or “standard” salvage lymph node dissection (SLND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 37 patients undergoing repeat RGS after prior SLND (n = 21) (SLND-RGS) or prior RGS (n = 16) (RGS-RGS) between 2014 and 2021 after initial radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic radiation therapy at two German tertiary referral centers. Kaplan–Meier analyses and uni-/multivariable Cox regression models were used to investigate factors associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and treatment-free survival (TFS) after repeat salvage surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Complete Biochemical Response (cBR, PSA < 0.2 ng/ml) was observed in 20/32 patients (5 NA). Median overall BRFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] after repeat salvage surgery was 10.8 months (mo) (5.3–22). On multivariable regression, only age (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.17) and preoperative PSA (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01–1.50) were associated with shorter BRFS, although PSA (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99–1.36) did not achieve significant predictor status in univariable analysis before (p value = 0.07). Overall, one year after second salvage surgery, 89% of the patients (number at risk: 19) did not receive additional treatment and median TFS was not reached. Clavien–Dindo grade > 3a complications were observed in 8% (3/37 patients). Limitations are the retrospective evaluation, heterogeneous SLND procedures, lack of long-term follow-up data, and small cohort size. CONCLUSION: In this study, repeat RGS was safe and provided clinically meaningful biochemical recurrence- and treatment-free intervals for selected cases. Patients having low preoperative PSA seemed to benefit most of repeat RGS, irrespective of prior SLND or RGS or the time from initial RP/first salvage surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04534-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10465644/ /pubmed/37515651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04534-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Falkenbach, Fabian
Knipper, Sophie
Koehler, Daniel
Ambrosini, Francesca
Steuber, Thomas
Graefen, Markus
Budäus, Lars
Eiber, Matthias
Lunger, Lukas
Lischewski, Flemming
Heck, Matthias M.
Maurer, Tobias
Safety and efficiency of repeat salvage lymph node dissection for recurrence of prostate cancer using PSMA-radioguided surgery (RGS) after prior salvage lymph node dissection with or without initial RGS support
title Safety and efficiency of repeat salvage lymph node dissection for recurrence of prostate cancer using PSMA-radioguided surgery (RGS) after prior salvage lymph node dissection with or without initial RGS support
title_full Safety and efficiency of repeat salvage lymph node dissection for recurrence of prostate cancer using PSMA-radioguided surgery (RGS) after prior salvage lymph node dissection with or without initial RGS support
title_fullStr Safety and efficiency of repeat salvage lymph node dissection for recurrence of prostate cancer using PSMA-radioguided surgery (RGS) after prior salvage lymph node dissection with or without initial RGS support
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficiency of repeat salvage lymph node dissection for recurrence of prostate cancer using PSMA-radioguided surgery (RGS) after prior salvage lymph node dissection with or without initial RGS support
title_short Safety and efficiency of repeat salvage lymph node dissection for recurrence of prostate cancer using PSMA-radioguided surgery (RGS) after prior salvage lymph node dissection with or without initial RGS support
title_sort safety and efficiency of repeat salvage lymph node dissection for recurrence of prostate cancer using psma-radioguided surgery (rgs) after prior salvage lymph node dissection with or without initial rgs support
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37515651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04534-5
work_keys_str_mv AT falkenbachfabian safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT knippersophie safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT koehlerdaniel safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT ambrosinifrancesca safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT steuberthomas safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT graefenmarkus safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT budauslars safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT eibermatthias safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT lungerlukas safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT lischewskiflemming safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT heckmatthiasm safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport
AT maurertobias safetyandefficiencyofrepeatsalvagelymphnodedissectionforrecurrenceofprostatecancerusingpsmaradioguidedsurgeryrgsafterpriorsalvagelymphnodedissectionwithorwithoutinitialrgssupport